GSA awards $3.7M environmental consulting contract to Environmental Testing and Consulting, Inc. for ARNG Southeast Region

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,715,377 ($3.7M)

Contractor: Environmental Testing and Consulting, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-09-30

End Date: 2026-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ARNG INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SOUTHEAST REGION TIER 3 SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, CLAYTON County, GEORGIA, 30349

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.7 million to ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AND CONSULTING, INC. for work described as: ARNG INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SOUTHEAST REGION TIER 3 SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the 3-year duration and scope of industrial hygiene services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. This contract supports the Army National Guard's environmental health and safety compliance. 5. The contractor's experience in environmental consulting is a key performance indicator. 6. Geographic focus on the Southeast region is clearly defined.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $3.7 million over three years for industrial hygiene services seems aligned with market rates for similar environmental consulting contracts. The firm fixed-price structure indicates that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government. Benchmarking against similar contracts for regional environmental health and safety support would provide a more precise value assessment, but the initial figures suggest a fair price for the expected services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives proposals from a range of qualified contractors, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and a wider selection of qualified service providers.

Public Impact

The Army National Guard (ARNG) in the Southeast region benefits from enhanced industrial hygiene and environmental safety support. Services delivered include environmental testing and consulting, crucial for maintaining a safe and compliant working environment. The geographic impact is concentrated within the Southeast region of the United States. Workforce implications include the need for specialized environmental health and safety professionals employed by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined in task orders.
Reliance on contractor's internal quality control for accurate testing and reporting.
Ensuring consistent service delivery across diverse ARNG facilities in the region.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract mitigates cost uncertainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Contract duration allows for continuity of essential services.
Contractor's specialization in environmental consulting is a positive signal.

Sector Analysis

The environmental consulting services sector is a significant market supporting government and private sector compliance with environmental regulations. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. Spending in this area is driven by regulatory requirements, risk management, and the need for specialized expertise in areas like industrial hygiene. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal contracts for similar environmental health and safety support services across different agencies and regions.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a small business set-aside. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the General Services Administration (GSA) or the supported agency (ARNG). Performance monitoring, adherence to the contract terms, and quality of services will be key areas of oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific internal oversight mechanisms are not detailed here.

Related Government Programs

Army National Guard Readiness Centers
Environmental Health and Safety Programs
Federal Environmental Consulting Services
Industrial Hygiene Services Contracts
GSA Federal Acquisition Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Contractor Performance Risk
Scope Definition Clarity
Service Delivery Timeliness

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.7 million to ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AND CONSULTING, INC.. ARNG INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE SOUTHEAST REGION TIER 3 SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AND CONSULTING, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-30. End: 2026-09-29.

What is the track record of Environmental Testing and Consulting, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly in industrial hygiene?

Environmental Testing and Consulting, Inc. (ETC) has a history of performing environmental services for government entities. While specific details on their track record with industrial hygiene for the Army National Guard are not provided in this summary, their award on this contract suggests they met the qualifications and experience requirements set forth in the solicitation. A deeper dive into ETC's past performance evaluations, contract history with agencies like GSA or DoD, and any reported issues or successes would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability in delivering similar services.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar environmental consulting services?

The contract value of approximately $3.7 million over three years for industrial hygiene services in the Southeast region appears to be within a reasonable range for the scope of work. Environmental consulting rates can vary significantly based on the specific services, geographic location, complexity of the environment, and the expertise required. Given that this was a full and open competition with five bidders, the pricing likely reflects competitive market forces. To provide a precise benchmark, one would need to compare this contract's total value and duration against other federal or state contracts for similar industrial hygiene and environmental consulting services awarded in the same region during a comparable timeframe.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential scope creep if requirements are not precisely defined, contractor performance issues leading to inadequate or inaccurate environmental assessments, and delays in service delivery impacting ARNG operational readiness. Mitigation strategies are embedded in the contract structure: the firm fixed-price (FFP) nature shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor. The full and open competition process aims to select a capable contractor. Oversight by a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and performance monitoring clauses within the contract are crucial for managing performance and ensuring compliance. Clear task order definitions and regular communication channels also help manage scope and timelines.

How effective is the chosen contract vehicle (Delivery Order) for procuring these specialized services?

A Delivery Order (DO) is typically issued against an existing indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar multiple-award contract. This method is effective for procuring specialized services like industrial hygiene when the exact timing and quantity of services needed may vary over the contract period. It allows the government to access pre-competed services and pricing, streamlining the acquisition process. The effectiveness hinges on the quality of the underlying IDIQ contract's competition and the clarity of the task orders issued under it. For specialized, recurring needs like environmental consulting, a DO against a well-structured IDIQ contract is generally an efficient and effective procurement method.

What are the historical spending patterns for industrial hygiene and environmental consulting services within the Army National Guard or GSA?

Historical spending patterns for industrial hygiene and environmental consulting within the Army National Guard (ARNG) and managed by agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) typically show consistent demand driven by regulatory compliance and operational safety requirements. Spending often fluctuates based on specific infrastructure projects, changes in environmental regulations, and readiness needs. Analyzing past ARNG budgets or GSA contract databases would reveal trends in contract awards, average contract values, and the prevalence of different types of environmental services procured. This specific contract's value of $3.7 million over three years should be viewed in the context of these broader historical spending trends for similar services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFHA23Q0008

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 38900 W HURON RIVER DR, ROMULUS, MI, 48174

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,687,105

Exercised Options: $4,185,121

Current Obligation: $3,715,377

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F222GA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline