Booz Allen Hamilton awarded $25.3M for PM CAS PES Support by GSA, spanning over 3 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,310,445 ($25.3M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2020-08-13

End Date: 2025-11-12

Contract Duration: 1,917 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: PM CAS PES SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: PICATINNY ARSENAL, MORRIS County, NEW JERSEY, 07806

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $25.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: PM CAS PES SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract provides essential program management and support services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term requirement for these services. 3. Awarded to a large, established contractor, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller, specialized firms. 4. The nature of the services points to a critical function within the agency's operations. 5. Performance context is crucial to ensure value is derived from these management consulting services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $25.3 million over approximately three years for administrative management and general management consulting services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting contracts awarded by GSA or other federal agencies for program management support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the contractor's experience suggests a capacity to deliver.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 5 bids suggests a competitive environment, which generally benefits price discovery and can lead to more favorable terms for the government. The specific details of the bidding process and the number of proposals received would offer further insight into the intensity of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of potential contractors to bid, fostering a more competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve service quality.

Public Impact

Federal agencies benefit from enhanced program management and administrative support, leading to more efficient operations. The services delivered are critical for the effective functioning of the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. The contract's impact is primarily within the federal government's administrative and management sectors. Workforce implications may include the utilization of skilled consultants and project managers, contributing to federal program execution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for contractor lock-in due to long-term nature of support.
Reliance on a single large contractor may reduce agility in adapting to evolving needs.
Ensuring continuous oversight is critical to maintain service quality and cost-effectiveness.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Contractor has a strong track record in providing similar services to the federal government.
The contract duration implies a stable and predictable need for these critical support functions.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale consulting contracts for program management and administrative support across various federal agencies, which often run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration for this award (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is a large business, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The extent of subcontracting to small businesses will be a key factor in assessing the overall impact on the small business ecosystem for this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the General Services Administration. Accountability measures would be tied to performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, which provide public access to award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Program Management Support Services
Administrative and Management Consulting
Federal IT Support Services
Government Operations Support

Risk Flags

Contract duration may lead to vendor lock-in.
Performance metrics and quality assurance need rigorous monitoring.
Potential for scope creep requires proactive management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $25.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. PM CAS PES SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-08-13. End: 2025-11-12.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with similar GSA contracts?

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. has a substantial track record with the General Services Administration (GSA) and other federal agencies, frequently securing contracts for management consulting, IT services, and program support. Their history with GSA includes numerous awards across various task orders and contract vehicles, often for complex and large-scale requirements. This extensive experience suggests a deep understanding of federal procurement processes and agency needs. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including client satisfaction ratings and any past performance issues, would provide further context on their reliability and capability for this specific award.

How does the awarded value compare to similar GSA consulting contracts?

The awarded value of approximately $25.3 million for program management and administrative support services over roughly three years is within the typical range for large-scale consulting engagements awarded by the GSA. Federal agencies often procure such services through multi-year contracts that can reach tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the scope and duration. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to benchmark against contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 541611) and service descriptions awarded by GSA or other agencies of comparable size and mission. Factors like the specific deliverables, labor categories, and the competitive landscape at the time of award also influence pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of contract?

Key risks associated with this contract include potential scope creep, where the requirements may expand beyond the initial agreement, leading to cost overruns and schedule delays. There's also a risk of contractor performance not meeting expectations, impacting the agency's program management capabilities. Over-reliance on a single contractor for critical support functions can create vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch providers or adapt to new technologies. Furthermore, ensuring the contractor maintains the necessary security clearances and adheres to data privacy regulations is paramount, especially when dealing with sensitive government information. Effective contract management and continuous oversight are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for taxpayer money in this context?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for taxpayer money in federal contracting. By allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. In the case of this $25.3 million contract for administrative management and general management consulting services, the fact that it was competed under full and open terms with 5 bidders suggests that the government received a range of proposals and pricing. This competition likely pressured bidders to offer their best value, leading to a more cost-effective outcome for the government compared to a sole-source or limited competition award. However, the ultimate value is also dependent on the quality of services delivered and the effectiveness of contract oversight.

What is the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services by GSA?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently spends significant amounts on administrative management and general management consulting services, reflecting the broad support these services provide across federal agencies. Historical spending data from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) would show a trend of multi-billion dollar annual expenditures by GSA in this category. This spending is driven by the need for expertise in areas such as strategic planning, organizational efficiency, program management, and policy development. The trend is generally influenced by federal budget allocations, agency priorities, and the increasing complexity of government operations, often leading to sustained or increasing demand for these professional services over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $41,274,243

Exercised Options: $38,754,532

Current Obligation: $25,310,445

Actual Outlays: $-410,439

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $1,500,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F008DA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline