GSA Awards $8,806 for VTC Equipment Installation in Richmond, VA to Avanchor, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,807 ($8.8K)

Contractor: Avanchor, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-04-08

Contract Duration: 5 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: VTC EQUIPMENT INSTALL RICHMOND VIRGINIA

Place of Performance

Location: RICHMOND, RICHMOND CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23219

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,806.5 to AVANCHOR, LLC for work described as: VTC EQUIPMENT INSTALL RICHMOND VIRGINIA Key points: 1. Spending is minimal at $8,806, indicating a small-scale procurement. 2. The contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), raising questions about competition. 3. Avanchor, LLC is the sole awardee, suggesting a potential lack of market research or a specific need. 4. The IT sector is relevant due to VTC equipment, but the specific NAICS code is 'Other Computer Related Services'.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The award amount is very small, making a direct price comparison difficult. However, the lack of competition under SAP suggests potential overpricing or missed savings.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' indicating a limited competition approach. This method may not have explored the full market, potentially impacting price discovery and value for money.

Taxpayer Impact: The taxpayer impact is likely minimal due to the small award value, but the lack of competition sets a precedent for potentially less efficient future procurements.

Public Impact

Small businesses may have been excluded from bidding due to the procurement method. Citizens may question the efficiency of awarding contracts without full competition, even for small amounts. The use of federal funds for VTC equipment supports agency communication needs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpricing
Limited market research indicated

Positive Signals

Small award value
Supports agency operations

Sector Analysis

This procurement falls under IT services, specifically related to computer equipment installation. The award value is significantly below typical IT infrastructure spending benchmarks.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not competed under SAP and awarded to a single vendor, Avanchor, LLC. It is unclear if small businesses were solicited or considered, but the limited competition suggests they may not have had a fair opportunity.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) awarded this contract. Oversight should focus on ensuring the justification for limited competition is sound and that future procurements explore broader competition.

Related Government Programs

Other Computer Related Services
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for price inflation
Limited market research
Unknown small business impact

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,806.5 to AVANCHOR, LLC. VTC EQUIPMENT INSTALL RICHMOND VIRGINIA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AVANCHOR, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,806.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-04-08.

What was the specific justification for not competing this contract under SAP, given the small award value?

The provided data states the contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP.' Without further documentation, the specific justification remains unknown. Typically, justifications might include urgency, a specific vendor capability, or a pre-existing relationship. However, for an $8,806 purchase order, exploring competitive quotes would generally be expected to ensure best value.

What is the risk associated with awarding a sole-source contract for VTC equipment installation?

The primary risk is paying a higher price than necessary due to the lack of competitive bidding. There's also a risk of receiving suboptimal service or equipment if the vendor is not incentivized by competition. Furthermore, it can set a precedent for less competitive awards in the future, potentially eroding trust in government procurement efficiency.

How effective is this procurement in achieving value for taxpayer money?

The effectiveness in achieving value is questionable due to the limited competition. While the absolute dollar amount is small, the lack of a competitive process means it's difficult to ascertain if the government secured the best possible price and service. Future procurements should prioritize competitive bidding to maximize taxpayer value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4900 WETHEREDSVILLE RD BLDG 1B, GWYNN OAK, MD, 21207

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,807

Exercised Options: $8,807

Current Obligation: $8,807

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline