GSA awards $267K for Enterprise Logistics Management System, a single delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $266,926 ($266.9K)

Contractor: Powertrain, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2027-04-08

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $733/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: FY26 ENTERPRISE LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ELMS) - FEDERAL LEARNING ENCLAVE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20415

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $266,926.16 to POWERTRAIN, INC. for work described as: FY26 ENTERPRISE LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ELMS) - FEDERAL LEARNING ENCLAVE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS) Key points: 1. This contract represents a small portion of overall federal IT spending. 2. The contract is for a delivery order under a larger contract. 3. The award was made on April 9, 2026, with an end date of April 8, 2027. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services'. 6. The contractor, POWERTRAIN, INC., is receiving this award. 7. The contract is for services within the District of Columbia.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $266,926.16 for a one-year period for an Enterprise Logistics Management System (ELMS) - Federal Learning Enclave Learning Management System (LMS) appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized IT services. However, without specific details on the scope of work, deliverables, and the specific functionalities of the ELMS/LMS, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar, publicly available contracts for learning management systems or enterprise logistics software would provide a clearer picture of cost-effectiveness. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract helps in cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the initial solicitation may have been open, certain sources were excluded, or the competition was limited in some way before the final award. The specific reasons for excluding other sources are not detailed, which could limit transparency. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to assess the intensity of the competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition raises questions about whether taxpayers received the best possible pricing. Further details on the exclusion of sources are needed to ensure fair market access and optimal value.

Public Impact

Federal employees involved in logistics and learning will benefit from the ELMS/LMS. The contract supports the delivery of learning management system functionalities. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia. The contract supports the IT workforce involved in managing and operating federal logistics systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed justification for excluding other sources in the competition.
Limited public information on the specific functionalities and scope of the ELMS/LMS.
Unclear if this delivery order represents a competitive re-evaluation or a continuation of an existing relationship.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a reputable federal agency.
The contract has a defined period of performance, allowing for future re-evaluation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader IT services sector, specifically focusing on software development and implementation for enterprise resource planning (ERP) and learning management systems (LMS). The federal government is a significant consumer of such services, with spending in this area often driven by the need for modernization, efficiency, and compliance. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing contracts for similar LMS or logistics management software solutions across various federal agencies, considering factors like user base, feature sets, and integration requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary consideration for this specific award, as neither a small business set-aside nor subcontracting goals are indicated. This suggests that the contract was likely awarded to a larger entity or that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly mandated within this delivery order. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore minimal for this particular contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. As a delivery order under a larger contract, oversight mechanisms would likely involve contract administration, performance monitoring, and adherence to the terms of the firm fixed-price agreement. Transparency is moderate, as the award is publicly listed, but detailed justifications for competition limitations and specific performance metrics are not readily available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Learning Management Systems
Enterprise Logistics Management Systems
GSA IT Schedule Contracts
Other Computer Related Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited Competition Justification Needed
Contractor Past Performance Unknown
Scope of Work Ambiguity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $266,926.16 to POWERTRAIN, INC.. FY26 ENTERPRISE LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ELMS) - FEDERAL LEARNING ENCLAVE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is POWERTRAIN, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $266,926.16.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2027-04-08.

What is the specific functionality and scope of the ELMS/LMS being procured?

The provided data identifies the procurement as the 'FY26 ENTERPRISE LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ELMS) - FEDERAL LEARNING ENCLAVE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (LMS)'. While the name suggests a dual purpose of managing enterprise logistics and serving as a learning management system within a federal enclave, the precise functionalities, modules, and scope of services are not detailed in the summary data. This could include features like user management, course delivery, progress tracking, reporting, integration with other federal systems, and specific logistics planning or tracking capabilities. A more detailed statement of work or contract award justification would be necessary to fully understand the scope.

How does the $266,926.16 award compare to similar federal LMS or ELMS contracts?

Benchmarking this $266,926.16 award requires comparing it to similar federal contracts for Learning Management Systems (LMS) or Enterprise Logistics Management Systems (ELMS). Given the award is for a single year and likely represents a delivery order, it may be for a specific module, user base, or a defined service period. Federal IT contracts can range from tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars. For a one-year duration and a single delivery order, this amount appears moderate for specialized IT services. However, without knowing the scale of deployment (number of users, complexity of features), it's difficult to make a definitive comparison. Contracts for enterprise-wide, multi-year LMS solutions typically cost significantly more.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract award?

Potential risks include the limited competition ('FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'), which could indicate a lack of robust price discovery and potentially higher costs for taxpayers. There's also a risk related to the contractor's past performance, which is not detailed here; a new or unproven contractor could lead to performance issues. Furthermore, the specific functionalities of the ELMS/LMS are not fully elaborated, creating a risk of scope creep or misalignment between delivered services and actual agency needs. The short duration (one year) also implies a need for future procurements, introducing potential transition risks.

What is the track record of POWERTRAIN, INC. with federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of POWERTRAIN, INC. with federal contracts is not provided in the summary data. To assess their reliability and performance history, one would need to examine their contract awards database (e.g., FPDS), past performance reviews, and any reported issues or successes on previous government projects. A strong track record with similar IT services, particularly in logistics or learning management systems, would be a positive indicator, while a history of performance problems or contract disputes would be a significant concern.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' competition level imply for taxpayers?

This competition level implies that while the contract was intended to be competed, certain potential bidders were excluded from the process. This exclusion could be due to various reasons, such as specific technical requirements, past performance issues with certain vendors, or a pre-existing relationship with the awarded contractor under a different vehicle. For taxpayers, this means there's a reduced assurance that the absolute lowest price was achieved, as the pool of potential offerors was narrowed. It raises a flag for further investigation into the justification for excluding other sources to ensure fair and effective use of public funds.

How does this contract fit into the broader landscape of federal IT spending?

This contract, valued at approximately $267,000 for a one-year period, represents a very small segment of the overall federal IT spending, which amounts to billions of dollars annually. It falls under the 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code (541519), a broad category encompassing various IT support and consulting functions. Such awards are common for specific system enhancements, specialized software, or short-term support needs. While individually small, the aggregate of numerous such contracts contributes significantly to the federal IT infrastructure and service delivery across agencies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QACA26R0253

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8201 CORPORATE DR STE 500, HYATTSVILLE, MD, 20785

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $841,485

Exercised Options: $266,926

Current Obligation: $266,926

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTSA25D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline