GSA awards $12.8M facilities maintenance BPA call to EMCOR Government Services for St. Elizabeths West Campus

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,780,822 ($12.8M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-11-01

End Date: 2025-10-31

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: RE-ESTABLISHED BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) CALL TO AWARD OPTION PERIOD 4 OF PERFORMANCE NOVEMBER 1, 2023 - OCTOBER 31, 2024 FOR THE FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS WASHINGTON, D.C.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20032

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $12.8 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: RE-ESTABLISHED BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) CALL TO AWARD OPTION PERIOD 4 OF PERFORMANCE NOVEMBER 1, 2023 - OCTOBER 31, 2024 FOR THE FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS WASHINGTON, D.C. Key points: 1. Contract provides essential operations and maintenance for a critical federal facility. 2. The award is a renewal, indicating a continued need and potentially stable performance. 3. Fixed-price with economic price adjustment contract type aims to balance cost certainty with market fluctuations. 4. The duration of the contract is two years, aligning with typical facilities management cycles. 5. This BPA call falls under facilities support services, a common and necessary government function. 6. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $12.8 million over two years for facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance services at the St. Elizabeths West Campus appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for federal properties of comparable size and complexity would provide a more precise value assessment. However, the fixed-price with economic price adjustment structure suggests an effort to control costs while accounting for potential market shifts in labor and material.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The General Services Administration (GSA) utilized a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call, suggesting that a pre-established agreement was in place, streamlining the award process while still allowing for competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a competitive bidding process. It ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, thereby encouraging market-driven pricing and innovation.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the General Services Administration (GSA) and the federal agencies operating within the St. Elizabeths West Campus. Services delivered include facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance, ensuring the proper functioning and upkeep of the campus infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the St. Elizabeths West Campus in Washington, D.C. The contract supports jobs in facilities management, engineering, and maintenance, likely benefiting the local Washington, D.C. workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost increases due to economic price adjustment clauses if market conditions fluctuate significantly.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
The specific details of the BPA call and the scope of work are not fully elaborated, making a precise risk assessment challenging.

Positive Signals

Award through full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing structure was achieved.
The renewal of the BPA call indicates satisfaction with the contractor's past performance.
The fixed-price component of the contract provides a degree of cost certainty for the government.
The contract duration of two years allows for consistent service delivery and planning.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210, Facilities Support Services, represents a significant market for government contracting. Spending in this sector is consistently high due to the government's extensive real estate portfolio. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large federal facilities management contracts, particularly those managed by GSA for similar campus environments.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside (ss: false) or indicate specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses (sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific award is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor, EMCOR Government Services, may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services, which would indirectly benefit the small business community.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is primarily managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction for this particular BPA call isn't detailed, the GSA IG generally oversees GSA contracts to ensure efficiency, integrity, and compliance.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
Government Facilities Operations and Maintenance
Public Buildings Service Contracts
General Services Administration Procurement

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) Clause
Contractor Performance Risk
Scope of Work Clarity

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $12.8 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. RE-ESTABLISHED BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) CALL TO AWARD OPTION PERIOD 4 OF PERFORMANCE NOVEMBER 1, 2023 - OCTOBER 31, 2024 FOR THE FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS WASHINGTON, D.C.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-11-01. End: 2025-10-31.

What is EMCOR Government Services' track record with GSA and similar federal contracts?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a substantial history of performing federal contracts, particularly with the General Services Administration (GSA). Their portfolio often includes large-scale facilities operations and maintenance, energy efficiency projects, and construction services for government facilities across various agencies. Analyzing their past performance ratings, any past performance issues or awards, and the volume of their federal contract awards provides insight into their reliability and capability. For instance, a review of their contract history might reveal consistent performance on similar BPA calls or large facility management contracts, suggesting a low risk of performance failure. Conversely, any history of significant contract disputes, performance deficiencies, or termination for default would raise concerns about their suitability for this current contract.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities maintenance services?

The awarded value of approximately $12.8 million over two years for facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance at the St. Elizabeths West Campus needs to be benchmarked against market rates. This involves comparing the estimated annual cost (around $6.4 million) to industry data for similar services in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Factors such as the square footage of the campus, the complexity of the systems maintained (HVAC, electrical, plumbing, security), and the level of service required (24/7 operations, preventative maintenance schedules) are crucial for an accurate comparison. Without specific details on these factors, a precise comparison is difficult. However, GSA typically conducts market research and cost analyses during procurement to ensure fair and reasonable pricing. If the contract was awarded through full and open competition, it suggests that the pricing was competitive within the market.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns due to the economic price adjustment (EPA) clause, especially if inflation significantly impacts labor and material costs. Performance risk is another concern; any lapse in essential maintenance could impact the functionality and safety of the St. Elizabeths West Campus. Furthermore, over-reliance on a single contractor for critical services presents a risk if the contractor faces financial instability or operational disruptions. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by GSA, clear performance metrics and service level agreements (SLAs), regular performance reviews, and contingency planning. The EPA clause itself is a mitigation tool, allowing for adjustments rather than outright cost increases, but requires careful monitoring. The fixed-price component also provides a baseline cost control.

How effective has GSA been in managing similar facilities maintenance contracts?

GSA's effectiveness in managing facilities maintenance contracts is generally considered good, given their extensive experience and established processes. They manage a vast portfolio of federal buildings, requiring sophisticated operational and maintenance strategies. Their use of performance-based contracts, competitive solicitations, and standardized oversight procedures aims to ensure value and service quality. However, like any large organization, GSA can face challenges, such as budget constraints impacting maintenance schedules or contractor performance issues. The success of this specific BPA call will depend on diligent contract administration, proactive issue resolution, and adherence to performance standards by both GSA and EMCOR Government Services.

What are the historical spending patterns for facilities maintenance at the St. Elizabeths West Campus?

Historical spending data for facilities maintenance at the St. Elizabeths West Campus prior to this award would provide valuable context. Understanding the annual expenditure over previous contract periods, the contractors involved, and any significant changes in spending levels can reveal trends. For example, a steady or gradually increasing spending pattern might indicate consistent service needs and inflation adjustments. A sudden spike or decrease could signal changes in the scope of services, facility usage, or procurement strategies. This information helps in assessing whether the current $12.8 million award for a two-year period is in line with historical investment in maintaining the campus.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Miller Electric Company

Address: 6363 WALKER LN, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $71,799,776

Exercised Options: $12,780,822

Current Obligation: $12,780,822

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0319A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline