GSA awards $608K contract for truck screening services, highlighting need for specialized security solutions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $608,266 ($608.3K)

Contractor: Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-09-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TRUCK SCREENING SERVICES FOR 1 BASE YEAR AND 4 OPTION YEARS: BASE YEAR POP - OCTOBER 1, 2025 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2026

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10007

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $608,266.2 to MICHAEL STAPLETON ASSOCIATES, LTD. for work described as: TRUCK SCREENING SERVICES FOR 1 BASE YEAR AND 4 OPTION YEARS: BASE YEAR POP - OCTOBER 1, 2025 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2026 Key points: 1. The contract value appears reasonable for specialized screening services, though a detailed benchmark is needed. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The fixed-price contract structure shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. This service supports essential base operations and security protocols. 5. The contract is positioned within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. 6. The duration of one base year with four option years allows for flexibility and continuity.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The base year award of $608,266.2 for truck screening services appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized security and logistical support. Without specific per-unit data or comparable contract details, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the financial risk for cost overruns, which is a positive indicator for the government. Benchmarking against similar services for other federal facilities would provide a more robust evaluation of pricing efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to vie for the contract. The presence of robust competition is generally expected to drive down prices and improve the quality of services offered, as contractors strive to present their most compelling proposals. The specific number of bidders was not provided, but the method of procurement suggests a competitive landscape.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the most advantageous for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a competitive bidding process and ensures that the government receives the best value.

Public Impact

Federal facilities and personnel benefit from enhanced security through truck screening. Essential logistical operations at the facility are supported by ensuring secure vehicle access. The services are geographically focused on New York, supporting operations within that region. The contract supports a specialized service industry, potentially involving trained security personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess contractor effectiveness beyond contract award.
The specific nature of 'truck screening' could encompass a wide range of technologies and personnel, requiring clarity on the exact services provided.
Potential for scope creep if the definition of 'screening' is not precisely defined in the contract.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market and potential for good value.
Firm-fixed-price contract structure places cost risk on the contractor, benefiting the government.
The contract provides continuity for essential security services at a federal facility.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category (NAICS 541990). This broad sector encompasses a wide array of specialized services that do not fit into more specific categories. The market for such services is diverse, ranging from environmental consulting to security services. Federal spending in this area is significant, supporting various government functions that require expertise beyond in-house capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other contracts for security screening, logistical support, or specialized technical services across different federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, small businesses were eligible to compete alongside larger firms. The implications for the small business ecosystem are neutral in terms of direct set-aside benefits. However, if the prime contractor intends to subcontract portions of this work, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate indirectly. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting plans include small business participation goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service (PBS). The firm-fixed-price contract type provides a degree of financial oversight by fixing the total cost. Performance monitoring would be conducted by the contracting officer's representative (COR) to ensure the contractor meets the specified requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Protective Service Contracts
Base Security Services
Logistics and Transportation Support Services
Professional and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics
Ambiguity in service scope definition
Limited historical spending data available
No contractor past performance data provided

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $608,266.2 to MICHAEL STAPLETON ASSOCIATES, LTD.. TRUCK SCREENING SERVICES FOR 1 BASE YEAR AND 4 OPTION YEARS: BASE YEAR POP - OCTOBER 1, 2025 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MICHAEL STAPLETON ASSOCIATES, LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $608,266.2.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the specific scope of 'truck screening services' covered under this contract, and what technologies or personnel are involved?

The provided data offers limited detail on the specific scope of 'truck screening services.' The NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' is very broad. Typically, truck screening can involve various methods, including visual inspection, X-ray scanning, explosive trace detection, K9 units, or background checks for drivers and cargo. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests a defined set of services is expected. To fully understand the scope, one would need to review the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). This document would detail the exact procedures, equipment, personnel qualifications, and reporting requirements, providing clarity on the level of security and the specific risks being mitigated.

How does the awarded amount of $608,266.2 compare to similar truck screening contracts awarded by the GSA or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking this contract's value requires comparing it to similar services procured by the government. A base year award of approximately $608,000 for truck screening suggests a significant operational requirement. To assess value for money, one would look for contracts with comparable durations, service levels, geographic locations, and security requirements. For instance, contracts for screening services at other federal buildings, military bases, or high-security facilities could serve as benchmarks. Without access to a detailed database of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this price is high or low. However, the full and open competition suggests the GSA aimed to achieve competitive pricing.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the contractor's performance in delivering truck screening services?

The provided contract data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics for evaluating the contractor's performance. However, in a contract for screening services, typical KPIs would likely focus on efficiency, accuracy, and compliance. Examples could include the average time taken to screen a truck, the rate of successful identification of prohibited items or security risks, adherence to established screening protocols, response times to security incidents, and personnel compliance with training and background check requirements. The contracting officer's representative (COR) would be responsible for monitoring these metrics and ensuring the contractor meets the standards outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

What is the historical spending pattern for truck screening services at this specific facility or for similar services by the General Services Administration?

The provided data focuses on a single contract award and does not offer historical spending patterns. To analyze historical spending, one would need to query federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending.gov) for previous contracts related to truck screening services at this specific facility or under the relevant GSA program office (Public Buildings Service). Examining past contract values, durations, and awardees would reveal trends in spending, identify potential cost increases or decreases over time, and highlight any changes in the competitive landscape. Understanding historical spending is crucial for assessing budget predictability and identifying potential anomalies or efficiencies.

What are the potential risks associated with the contractor, Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd., based on their past performance or track record?

The provided data includes the contractor's name, Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd., but does not offer information regarding their past performance or track record. A comprehensive risk assessment would require accessing performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) for this company on previous federal contracts. Key areas to investigate would include their history of meeting deadlines, quality of work, cost control, compliance with contract terms, and any past disputes or contract terminations. Without this performance data, it is impossible to assess specific risks associated with this contractor beyond the general risks inherent in any service contract.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PM0925Q0023

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 9 MURRAY ST, NEW YORK, NY, 10007

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,111,803

Exercised Options: $608,266

Current Obligation: $608,266

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSWA19D0099

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline