GSA Awards $6.75M Coast Guard Command Center Construction to Elite Pacific Construction in Hawaii

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,753,881 ($6.8M)

Contractor: Elite Pacific Construction Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-12-27

End Date: 2025-08-15

Contract Duration: 597 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TENANT IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR THE US COAST GUARD COMMAND CENTER AT THE PRINCE KUHIO FEDERAL BUILDING IN HONOLULU HI

Place of Performance

Location: HONOLULU, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96850

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $6.8 million to ELITE PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION INC. for work described as: TENANT IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR THE US COAST GUARD COMMAND CENTER AT THE PRINCE KUHIO FEDERAL BUILDING IN HONOLULU HI Key points: 1. The project involves significant tenant improvements for a critical US Coast Guard facility. 2. Elite Pacific Construction, a local Hawaii firm, secured the contract. 3. The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a specific justification for limiting initial bidders. 4. The sector is Construction, with a focus on commercial and institutional building. 5. The project duration is substantial at 597 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The $6.75M price for a tenant improvement project of this scale and duration appears within a reasonable range for specialized government construction. Benchmarking against similar federal building renovations in high-cost areas like Hawaii would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method suggests that while competition was intended, initial sources may have been restricted. This could potentially limit price discovery compared to a truly unrestricted full and open process, though the final award was made after this phase.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential infrastructure upgrades for a federal agency, aiming for long-term operational efficiency and security.

Public Impact

Enhances operational capabilities for the US Coast Guard in Hawaii. Supports federal infrastructure development in a key strategic location. Provides economic activity through construction services in the local Hawaii market. Ensures a secure and functional command center for national security operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition justification requires scrutiny.
Potential for cost overruns in long-duration construction projects.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant project.

Positive Signals

Addresses critical infrastructure needs for the Coast Guard.
Awarded to a firm operating within the project's geographic region.
Fixed-price contract type can help control costs if well-defined.

Sector Analysis

This project falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Federal construction spending benchmarks vary widely based on project type, location, and complexity. Tenant improvements often represent a significant portion of overall building costs, especially for specialized government facilities.

Small Business Impact

While the contract was awarded to Elite Pacific Construction Inc., the data does not indicate if this is a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation, either as the prime contractor or through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for managing federal buildings and procurement. Oversight would involve monitoring project progress, adherence to budget, and quality of work to ensure taxpayer funds are used effectively and the facility meets operational requirements.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Justification for 'Exclusion of Sources' requires detailed review.
Long project duration increases risk of cost escalation and delays.
Potential for scope creep in complex construction projects.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $6.8 million to ELITE PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION INC.. TENANT IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR THE US COAST GUARD COMMAND CENTER AT THE PRINCE KUHIO FEDERAL BUILDING IN HONOLULU HI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ELITE PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-12-27. End: 2025-08-15.

What specific factors justified the 'Exclusion of Sources' in the initial competition phase, and how did this impact the final price?

The justification for excluding sources needs to be thoroughly reviewed to ensure it was valid and did not unduly restrict competition. If the exclusion was based on specific capabilities or prior performance, it might be justifiable. However, any limitation on the pool of potential bidders could potentially lead to higher prices than if a broader competition had been feasible from the outset.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) being tracked for this project, and how will success be measured beyond project completion?

Success metrics should extend beyond mere on-time and on-budget completion. KPIs should include the operational readiness and efficiency of the command center post-renovation, the long-term durability of the improvements, and the satisfaction of the end-user (US Coast Guard) with the new facilities. Regular post-occupancy evaluations would be beneficial.

How does the $6.75M cost compare to similar tenant improvement projects for federal command centers in comparable geographic regions?

A detailed cost-benefit analysis comparing this project's expenditure to similar federal command center renovations in regions with comparable construction costs (e.g., other Pacific islands or high-cost mainland urban areas) is crucial. This comparison should account for specific security requirements, technological integrations, and the duration of the project to determine if the pricing is competitive and represents good value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PK0123R0007

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 46-174 KAHUHIPA ST STE B2, KANEOHE, HI, 96744

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,753,881

Exercised Options: $6,753,881

Current Obligation: $6,753,881

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 11

Total Subaward Amount: $3,746,792

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK0121D0033

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline