GSA Awards $2.39M for Fire Alarm System Replacement at Reagan Federal Building

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,389,432 ($2.4M)

Contractor: Fasone Construction, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-03-30

End Date: 2025-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,007 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN BUILD FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT - RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE, 411 W 4TH STREET, SANTA ANA, CA 92701. CONTRACT # 47PK0121D0052 TASK ORDER # 47PK0123F0006.

Place of Performance

Location: SANTA ANA, ORANGE County, CALIFORNIA, 92701

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.4 million to FASONE CONSTRUCTION, INC. for work described as: DESIGN BUILD FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT - RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE, 411 W 4TH STREET, SANTA ANA, CA 92701. CONTRACT # 47PK0121D0052 TASK ORDER # 47PK0123F0006. Key points: 1. Project aims to replace the fire alarm system at a major federal building in Santa Ana, CA. 2. Contract awarded to Fasone Construction, Inc. for $2.39 million. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', raising questions about price discovery. 4. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2.39 million for a fire alarm system replacement in a federal building appears within a reasonable range for such projects. However, without specific details on the scope of work and system complexity, a precise benchmark is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, specific sources were excluded. This could limit the pool of bidders and potentially impact price discovery, possibly leading to a less competitive price than a truly unrestricted full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for this essential building infrastructure upgrade. The effectiveness of the competition method will directly influence the value for money achieved.

Public Impact

Ensures the safety and operational continuity of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse. Supports federal infrastructure modernization efforts. Potential impact on local construction jobs and businesses.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited competition method may impact price.
  • Lack of small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

  • Essential infrastructure upgrade for a federal facility.
  • Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This project falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, which encompasses a wide range of construction services for non-residential buildings. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on project size, complexity, and location.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-asides were considered or if opportunities were missed for small business participation in this project.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method warrants scrutiny to ensure fair and effective competition and accountability in the use of taxpayer funds.

Related Government Programs

  • Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
  • General Services Administration Contracting
  • Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

  • Limited competition method.
  • No small business participation.
  • Potential for higher costs due to source exclusion.
  • Need for justification of excluded sources.

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, general-services-administration, ca, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.4 million to FASONE CONSTRUCTION, INC.. DESIGN BUILD FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT PROJECT - RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE, 411 W 4TH STREET, SANTA ANA, CA 92701. CONTRACT # 47PK0121D0052 TASK ORDER # 47PK0123F0006.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FASONE CONSTRUCTION, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-03-30. End: 2025-12-31.

What specific criteria led to the exclusion of certain sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and how did this impact the final price?

The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific technical requirements, past performance, or security clearances are necessary, limiting the eligible bidder pool. While this can ensure a qualified contractor, it may reduce competitive pressure. The impact on the final price depends on how many qualified bidders remained and their respective bids. A thorough review of the solicitation documents and bid analysis would be required to determine the precise price impact.

What are the potential risks associated with a 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' procurement strategy for a project of this nature?

The primary risk is reduced competition, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers than a truly unrestricted procurement. It could also limit the availability of innovative solutions if certain types of contractors are excluded. Ensuring the exclusion criteria are justified, narrowly tailored, and clearly documented is crucial to mitigate these risks and maintain fairness.

How does the firm fixed price contract type contribute to the overall value and effectiveness of this fire alarm system replacement project?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract provides the government with cost certainty, as the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns. This is highly beneficial for projects like infrastructure replacement where the scope is well-defined. It enhances budget predictability and simplifies financial oversight, contributing to the project's overall effectiveness by ensuring the work is completed within the agreed-upon budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PK0123R0001

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 8644 NORWALK BLVD, WHITTIER, CA, 90606

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,389,432

Exercised Options: $2,389,432

Current Obligation: $2,389,432

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK0121D0052

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-03-30

Current End Date: 2025-12-31

Potential End Date: 2025-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-02-05

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending