GSA awards $330K contract for workshop facilitation services to Parsons Government Services Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $330,333 ($330.3K)

Contractor: Parsons Government Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-09-30

End Date: 2026-07-11

Contract Duration: 284 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE FACILITATION OF WORKSHOPS.

Place of Performance

Location: CENTREVILLE, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20120

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $330,333.24 to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. for work described as: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE FACILITATION OF WORKSHOPS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for professional services related to workshop facilitation. 2. The contract has a duration of 284 days. 3. The award was made under a firm-fixed-price contract type. 4. This contract is a delivery order under a larger contract. 5. The services are categorized under Engineering Services. 6. The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $330,333.24 for workshop facilitation services over approximately 284 days appears to be within a reasonable range for professional services of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilitation and professional services is challenging without more specific details on the scope and complexity of the workshops. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The data shows 3 bids were received. A competitive process with multiple bidders generally supports price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition with multiple bidders suggests that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by ensuring a competitive market drives pricing for these professional services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal agencies requiring facilitated workshops for planning, strategy development, or problem-solving. The services delivered will support the operational needs of the General Services Administration, specifically its Public Buildings Service. The geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the contract is registered. Workforce implications are related to the engagement of professional facilitators and potentially support staff for workshop execution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited public information on the specific deliverables and success metrics for the workshop facilitation.
The relatively small contract value may indicate a limited scope, but the impact of poorly facilitated workshops could still be significant.
Dependence on a single delivery order under a potentially larger contract structure warrants monitoring of overall program performance.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration, an agency with established procurement processes.

Sector Analysis

The professional services sector, particularly consulting and support services for government operations, is a significant market. This contract falls within the broader category of management and technical consulting services. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 (Engineering Services) is listed, which may indicate that the workshops are related to engineering or technical projects, though the description focuses on facilitation. Comparable spending benchmarks for workshop facilitation services vary widely based on duration, complexity, and the expertise of the facilitators.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal, unless Parsons Government Services Inc. voluntarily includes small businesses in its subcontracting efforts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting officers and program managers within the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. Accountability is established through the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, though detailed performance metrics are not always readily available.

Related Government Programs

GSA Professional Services Schedule
Management and Consulting Services
Federal Workshop and Training Services
Public Buildings Service Operations Support

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep if workshop objectives are not clearly defined.
Risk of underperformance if facilitators lack necessary expertise.
Dependence on contractor's ability to manage logistics and participant engagement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $330,333.24 to PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC.. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE FACILITATION OF WORKSHOPS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PARSONS GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $330,333.24.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-30. End: 2026-07-11.

What is the specific scope and expected outcome of the workshops to be facilitated under this contract?

The provided data describes the contract as being for 'PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE FACILITATION OF WORKSHOPS.' However, it does not detail the specific subject matter, objectives, or expected outcomes of these workshops. This information is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the contract's purpose and value. Without this context, it is difficult to assess the necessity and potential impact of the services. Further details would likely be found in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) associated with the delivery order, which are not included in the provided data.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar workshop facilitation services in the federal market?

Benchmarking the pricing of this $330,333.24 contract against similar federal workshop facilitation services is challenging without more granular data. The contract value covers approximately 284 days of service, implying a daily rate. However, the complexity, duration, and specific expertise required for the workshops are unknown. Typically, federal professional services are procured through various contract vehicles, including GSA Schedules, which offer pre-negotiated rates. A firm-fixed-price contract, as used here, means the contractor is responsible for costs. To perform a robust comparison, one would need to analyze the hourly or daily rates of facilitators, the number of facilitators involved, and the specific deliverables against publicly available data for comparable services, considering factors like agency, location, and service complexity.

What is the track record of Parsons Government Services Inc. in delivering similar facilitation services to the federal government?

Parsons Government Services Inc. is a known entity in the federal contracting space, often providing a range of professional and technical services. While this specific contract focuses on workshop facilitation, Parsons' broader experience likely includes project management, technical consulting, and support services that may involve elements of facilitation or coordination. To assess their track record specifically for facilitation, one would need to review past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) on similar contracts, look for awards related to training, strategic planning, or collaborative session management, and examine their portfolio of government projects. Without direct access to these performance records, a definitive assessment of their facilitation-specific track record is limited.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Potential risks for this contract include the possibility of poorly facilitated workshops that do not achieve their intended objectives, leading to wasted government resources and time. Another risk could be the contractor failing to meet performance standards or deadlines. Mitigation strategies are inherent in the contract structure: the firm-fixed-price nature places cost risk on the contractor, incentivizing efficient delivery. The competitive award process suggests a selection of a capable vendor. Furthermore, the General Services Administration's oversight mechanisms, including contract management and potential performance reviews, serve to monitor progress and address issues. Clear definition of workshop objectives and deliverables in the SOW/PWS is also a key mitigation factor.

How does this contract align with the strategic goals of the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service?

The Public Buildings Service (PBS) within the GSA is responsible for managing, developing, and protecting federal government buildings. Workshop facilitation services, while seemingly administrative, can directly support PBS's strategic goals by enabling effective planning, collaboration, and problem-solving among its staff, stakeholders, and potentially external partners. For instance, workshops could be used for strategic planning sessions, developing new service delivery models, improving operational efficiency, or addressing complex facility management challenges. By facilitating these discussions, the contract contributes to the PBS's ability to execute its mission effectively and efficiently.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQWPIA-25-0029

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Parsons Corporation

Address: 5875 TRINITY PKWY STE 230, CENTREVILLE, VA, 20120

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $330,333

Exercised Options: $330,333

Current Obligation: $330,333

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA19D000A

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline