Valiant Construction LLC awarded $26.19M for Indianapolis Federal Building construction, a firm-fixed-price delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,618,840 ($2.6M)

Contractor: Valiant Construction LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-04-14

End Date: 2026-04-27

Contract Duration: 378 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION AWARD FOR THE BIRCH BAYH FEDERAL BUILDING AND U.S. COURTHOUSE, 46 E. OHIO STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204 (IN0048ZZ).

Place of Performance

Location: INDIANAPOLIS, MARION County, INDIANA, 46204

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2.6 million to VALIANT CONSTRUCTION LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCTION AWARD FOR THE BIRCH BAYH FEDERAL BUILDING AND U.S. COURTHOUSE, 46 E. OHIO STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204 (IN0048ZZ). Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in federal infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics for this project are crucial for ensuring taxpayer value. 3. Performance risk is moderate given the project's scope and duration. 4. This award fits within the broader context of federal building modernization efforts. 5. The construction sector is a key area for federal capital spending. 6. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs and manage risk.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award of $26.19 million for the Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse renovation appears reasonable for a project of this scale and complexity. Benchmarking against similar federal construction projects for courthouses and federal office buildings of comparable size and scope would provide a more definitive assessment of value for money. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the primary risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while competition was sought, certain sources may have been excluded for specific reasons, potentially related to specialized capabilities or prior performance. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a degree of competition, but the exclusion of other potential sources warrants further investigation to ensure the most competitive pricing was achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition, even after exclusion of sources, may have resulted in a higher price than if a truly open and unrestricted competition had occurred. Taxpayers benefit when multiple qualified bidders vie for contracts, driving down costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal judicial and administrative functions housed within the Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse. The project will deliver modernized and potentially expanded facilities for government operations. The geographic impact is concentrated in Indianapolis, Indiana, serving the local federal workforce and public. Workforce implications include job creation for construction trades and related support services in the Indianapolis area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The federal government is a significant consumer of construction services for its vast portfolio of buildings. Spending in this area is often driven by the need for modernization, repair, and expansion of facilities to meet evolving operational requirements and safety standards. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the average cost per square foot for similar federal building renovations across different regions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Valiant Construction LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would contribute to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting, though specific oversight reports from an Inspector General would depend on the nature of any issues that arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, federal-building, courthouse, indianapolis, indiana, general-services-administration, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, commercial-institutional-building-construction, limited-competition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2.6 million to VALIANT CONSTRUCTION LLC. CONSTRUCTION AWARD FOR THE BIRCH BAYH FEDERAL BUILDING AND U.S. COURTHOUSE, 46 E. OHIO STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204 (IN0048ZZ).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VALIANT CONSTRUCTION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-14. End: 2026-04-27.

What is Valiant Construction LLC's track record with federal construction contracts, particularly with the GSA?

Valiant Construction LLC has a history of performing federal construction contracts. A detailed review of their past performance with the General Services Administration (GSA) and other federal agencies would be necessary to fully assess their track record. This would involve examining contract completion rates, any instances of disputes or claims, and client satisfaction feedback. Understanding their experience with projects of similar size, scope, and complexity, especially those involving historic or sensitive federal buildings like courthouses, is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this $26.19 million delivery order.

How does the awarded price of $26.19 million compare to similar federal building construction projects in Indiana or the Midwest region?

To benchmark the $26.19 million award, one would compare it against the cost per square foot or total project cost of recently completed federal building construction or renovation projects of similar scale and type (e.g., courthouses, federal office buildings) in Indiana and the surrounding Midwest region. Factors such as the age and condition of the existing structure, the extent of renovation required, specific security or technological upgrades, and prevailing local construction labor and material costs would influence these comparisons. Without specific comparable project data, it's difficult to definitively state if this award represents excellent or fair value, but it provides a starting point for detailed cost analysis.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific construction project, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this construction project include potential unforeseen site conditions (e.g., hazardous materials, structural issues not apparent during initial inspection), schedule delays due to weather, labor shortages, or supply chain disruptions, and the possibility of scope creep if requirements change during execution. Mitigation strategies include thorough site investigations prior to award, the firm-fixed-price contract structure which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and schedules efficiently, and robust project management and oversight by the GSA. Contingency planning within the contract and regular progress reviews are also key mitigation tools.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the functionality and efficiency of the Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse?

This contract is expected to significantly enhance the functionality and efficiency of the Birch Bayh Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse. Renovations typically address outdated systems (HVAC, electrical, plumbing), improve space utilization, upgrade security features, and ensure compliance with modern building codes and accessibility standards. By modernizing the facility, the project aims to create a safer, more efficient, and more cost-effective working environment for federal employees, improve the experience for the public interacting with the courthouse, and extend the useful life of a critical piece of federal infrastructure.

How has federal spending on construction projects like this evolved over the past five years, and what trends are evident?

Federal spending on construction projects, particularly for infrastructure and federal buildings, has generally seen fluctuations over the past five years, influenced by economic conditions, infrastructure initiatives, and agency modernization priorities. Trends often include a focus on sustainable building practices, energy efficiency upgrades, cybersecurity enhancements within facilities, and the repair and modernization of aging infrastructure. Analyzing historical spending data from agencies like the GSA can reveal patterns in the types of construction projects prioritized, the average contract values, and the competitive landscape for these awards.

What is the significance of the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' designation for this award?

The designation 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' indicates that the contract was initially intended for full and open competition, but certain potential offerors were excluded from the competition pool. This exclusion typically occurs when specific capabilities, past performance, or unique qualifications are required that only a limited number of sources possess, or when national security concerns necessitate limiting the pool. While it implies some level of competition was sought, the exclusion of sources raises questions about whether the government achieved the most competitive pricing and the broadest possible range of innovative solutions compared to a completely unrestricted competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PF0025Q0018

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4124 WAHL STREET BLVD, LOUISVILLE, KY, 40218

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,618,840

Exercised Options: $2,618,840

Current Obligation: $2,618,840

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PF0024D0058

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-04-14

Current End Date: 2026-04-27

Potential End Date: 2026-05-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-03

More Contracts from Valiant Construction LLC

View all Valiant Construction LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending