GSA awards $8.3M contract for door and transwall repair in DC, with a 182-day performance period

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,331 ($8.3K)

Contractor: Imaq EML JV, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-10-05

Contract Duration: 182 days

Daily Burn Rate: $46/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REPAIR AND REPLACE FERC DOOR AND TRANSWALL REPLACEMENT DC0450ZZ.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20002

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,330.57 to IMAQ EML JV, LLC for work described as: REPAIR AND REPLACE FERC DOOR AND TRANSWALL REPLACEMENT DC0450ZZ. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized facilities maintenance in a high-cost urban area. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. Fixed-price contract type may limit cost overruns for the government. 4. Performance period of 182 days is relatively short, indicating a focused scope of work. 5. The contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category with many providers. 6. No small business set-aside was noted, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller firms.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $8.3 million for door and transwall repair and replacement seems within a reasonable range for specialized facilities maintenance in the District of Columbia. Given the nature of the work, which likely involves structural components and potentially specialized materials, the cost reflects the complexity and location. Benchmarking against similar GSA projects for building envelope repairs in major metropolitan areas would provide a more precise value assessment, but the initial figure does not immediately raise significant concerns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding process where multiple companies likely vied for the contract. The level of competition is not explicitly stated in terms of the number of bidders, but the designation implies a market capable of supporting multiple interested parties for facilities support services.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to more favorable pricing and better quality services. It ensures that the government is not limited to a select few providers, increasing the likelihood of obtaining value for money.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors working within the General Services Administration facilities in the District of Columbia will benefit from improved building security and functionality. The contract delivers essential repair and replacement services for critical building components, ensuring the integrity and usability of federal property. The geographic impact is localized to the District of Columbia, specifically within GSA-managed facilities. The contract supports the maintenance and operational workforce, likely involving skilled tradespeople and construction professionals.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if unforeseen structural issues are discovered during repairs.
Reliance on a single awardee for a critical repair task could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract structure helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a healthy market and potential for competitive pricing.
The awardee, IMAQ EML JV, LLC, is likely experienced in facilities maintenance and repair.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad industry encompassing a wide range of maintenance, repair, and operational services for commercial and government buildings. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the need to maintain aging infrastructure and ensure operational efficiency. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar repair and maintenance contracts by agencies like GSA or other federal entities would typically range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars, depending on the scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. This indicates that the primary award went to a larger entity or a joint venture without a specific small business focus. Consequently, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular contract may be limited, although the prime contractor could potentially engage small businesses as subcontractors if it aligns with their strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service, which is responsible for managing federal buildings. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to complete the work for the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, allowing for review of basic contract details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
GSA Facilities Management
Building Envelope Repair Services
Government Construction Projects
Public Infrastructure Maintenance

Risk Flags

Short performance period may indicate a limited scope or potential for follow-on work.
Fixed-price contract requires careful monitoring to ensure quality is not compromised.
Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals could limit opportunities for smaller firms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,330.57 to IMAQ EML JV, LLC. REPAIR AND REPLACE FERC DOOR AND TRANSWALL REPLACEMENT DC0450ZZ.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is IMAQ EML JV, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,330.57.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-10-05.

What is the track record of IMAQ EML JV, LLC in performing similar facilities repair and replacement contracts for the federal government?

IMAQ EML JV, LLC, as a joint venture, likely brings together the capabilities of its constituent companies. A thorough review of federal contract databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would be necessary to ascertain their specific track record. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, the types and values of previous contracts awarded to the JV or its members, and any reported issues or successes. Without this detailed historical data, it's difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond the fact that they were selected through a competitive process for this particular task. Their ability to successfully execute this door and transwall replacement project will be a key indicator of their capabilities.

How does the $8.3 million contract value compare to similar door and transwall replacement projects in the District of Columbia?

Benchmarking the $8.3 million contract value requires comparing it to similar projects within the District of Columbia, considering factors like the scale of the replacement (number of doors/transwalls), materials used, and the specific facility type. For instance, replacing a few high-security doors in a government building might cost significantly more per unit than replacing standard office partitions. If this contract covers a substantial number of units or involves complex architectural or security features, the price could be justified. Conversely, if it's for a relatively small scope, it might indicate premium pricing. A detailed breakdown of the work items and quantities would be needed for a precise comparison against market rates or other federal contracts.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for door and transwall replacement?

The primary risk with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract, while generally favorable for cost control, is the potential for the contractor to cut corners on quality or materials to maintain profitability if unforeseen issues arise or costs escalate beyond their initial estimates. For this specific contract, risks include discovering hidden structural damage during the replacement process that could lead to change orders if not adequately scoped, or potential delays if specialized materials are difficult to procure. The short performance period also presents a risk of schedule slippage if the contractor encounters significant challenges, potentially impacting the functionality of the facility.

How effective are GSA's standard procurement processes in ensuring value for money for facilities maintenance contracts like this one?

GSA's standard procurement processes, particularly the use of full and open competition for contracts like this, are designed to promote value for money by encouraging a wide range of bidders and fostering competition. The agency often utilizes pre-qualified vendor lists and standardized contract vehicles (like BPAs, as indicated here) to streamline acquisition. However, the effectiveness in ensuring value is contingent on accurate scope definition, robust evaluation criteria, and diligent contract administration. For facilities maintenance, where conditions can be variable, ensuring the initial scope is comprehensive and that performance is closely monitored are critical to realizing the intended value.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the General Services Administration in the District of Columbia?

The General Services Administration is a major federal entity responsible for managing a vast portfolio of government buildings, particularly in Washington D.C. Historical spending patterns for facilities support services by GSA in the District of Columbia are substantial, likely running into hundreds of millions of dollars annually across various categories such as maintenance, repair, custodial services, security, and utilities. Contracts for specific repairs like doors and transwalls are a component of this larger spending. Analyzing GSA's historical obligations for similar services in the DC area would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the distribution among different contracting mechanisms (e.g., competitive vs. sole-source).

What are the implications of the 182-day performance period for the scope and potential for future work?

A 182-day (approximately six-month) performance period suggests that this contract is intended for a specific, defined scope of work rather than a long-term, ongoing maintenance agreement. This could mean it addresses a particular set of identified repair needs or a planned upgrade. For taxpayers, a shorter, well-defined period can offer better cost predictability. For the contractor, it implies a focused effort. The implications for future work are uncertain; this contract might be a standalone project, or it could be a precursor to larger renovations if the initial repairs reveal broader needs or if the contractor performs exceptionally well, potentially leading to follow-on opportunities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PE5226Q0027

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2700 GAMBELL ST STE 401, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,331

Exercised Options: $8,331

Current Obligation: $8,331

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PN1125A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline