G E A Builders Inc. awarded $44.4K contract for Judiciary Probation Breakroom renovation in San Diego, CA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,396 ($44.4K)

Contractor: G E a Builders Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-08-06

Contract Duration: 122 days

Daily Burn Rate: $364/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: RENOVATION AND EXPANSION OF JUDICIARY PROBATION BREAKROOM AT US PROBATION OFFICE IN SAN DIEGO, CA

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92101

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $44,396.35 to G E A BUILDERS INC. for work described as: RENOVATION AND EXPANSION OF JUDICIARY PROBATION BREAKROOM AT US PROBATION OFFICE IN SAN DIEGO, CA Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work. 2. The contract was not competed, raising questions about potential cost savings. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. Project duration is 122 days, indicating a short-term renovation. 5. The work falls under commercial and institutional building construction. 6. Location in San Diego, California, specifies the geographic area of service.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $44,396.35 is modest for a construction project. Without comparable renovation projects for similar facilities, it is difficult to definitively benchmark the value. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost certainty. The absence of competition, though, means there's no market-driven price discovery to ensure optimal value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not open to competitive bidding. This approach is typically used when only one contractor is capable of performing the work or in specific emergency situations. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from multiple bids to drive down prices or explore a wider range of solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to ensure the lowest possible price.

Public Impact

Federal judiciary employees in San Diego will benefit from an improved breakroom facility. The project delivers renovation and expansion services for a government building. The geographic impact is limited to San Diego, California. The contract supports the construction workforce involved in the renovation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may result in a higher price than a competed contract.
Sole-source awards can set a precedent for future non-competitive procurements.
Limited transparency due to the absence of a competitive bidding process.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Specific scope of work for a necessary facility improvement.
Contract duration is defined, allowing for clear project management.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector encompasses a wide range of activities, from large-scale infrastructure to smaller commercial renovations. This contract falls into the latter category, focusing on building construction for institutional purposes. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major federal agency that procures construction services for government facilities nationwide. Benchmarking this specific renovation against broader construction spending is challenging due to its niche nature, but it represents a small component of overall federal real property maintenance and improvement.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded to a small business, nor does it appear to have a small business set-aside provision. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal, unless G E A Builders Inc. voluntarily engages small businesses for specialized services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. As a definitive contract, it is subject to standard federal procurement regulations and oversight. Accountability measures would include adherence to the contract terms, performance standards, and delivery schedule. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with details primarily available through federal procurement databases.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Renovations
Judiciary Facilities Maintenance
GSA Construction Contracts
San Diego Federal Projects

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing pressure.
Limited public information on contractor's past performance.
Potential for higher costs due to non-competitive nature.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $44,396.35 to G E A BUILDERS INC.. RENOVATION AND EXPANSION OF JUDICIARY PROBATION BREAKROOM AT US PROBATION OFFICE IN SAN DIEGO, CA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is G E A BUILDERS INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44,396.35.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-08-06.

What is the track record of G E A Builders Inc. in performing federal construction contracts?

Information regarding G E A Builders Inc.'s specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive review would require accessing federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS to examine past performance, contract history, and any reported issues or successes. Without this external data, it's impossible to assess their experience, reliability, or past performance quality on similar government projects. This lack of readily available performance data is a common challenge when evaluating smaller or less frequently contracted firms.

How does the price of $44,396.35 compare to similar Judiciary breakroom renovations?

Benchmarking this $44,396.35 contract against similar Judiciary breakroom renovations is challenging without access to a database of comparable projects. Factors such as the size of the breakroom, the extent of renovation (e.g., plumbing, electrical, finishes), and local labor costs in San Diego would significantly influence pricing. Given the sole-source nature of this award, there's no direct competitive data to suggest whether this price is optimal. A thorough comparison would necessitate identifying other federal breakroom renovation contracts, ideally within the same region and with similar scopes, and analyzing their awarded values and contract types.

What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source contract?

The primary risk associated with this sole-source contract is the potential for a suboptimal price due to the lack of competition. Without multiple bidders, there is no market pressure to ensure G E A Builders Inc. offered the most cost-effective solution. Another risk is the potential for scope creep or delays, although the fixed-price contract type aims to mitigate cost overruns. Furthermore, the limited transparency inherent in sole-source awards can obscure potential inefficiencies or contractor performance issues that might be revealed in a competitive bidding process. Ensuring robust oversight from the GSA is crucial to manage these risks.

How effective is the fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for this renovation project?

The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for renovation projects by shifting the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. This means the government knows the total cost upfront, provided the scope of work remains unchanged. For a relatively small and well-defined project like a breakroom renovation, an FFP contract incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently and complete the work within budget. However, the overall value is still dependent on the initial price negotiation, which is compromised in a sole-source scenario. If the initial price was inflated due to lack of competition, the FFP contract locks in that potentially higher cost.

What is the historical spending pattern for Judiciary breakroom renovations by the GSA?

Historical spending patterns for Judiciary breakroom renovations by the GSA are not detailed in the provided data. This specific contract represents a single instance of spending. To understand historical patterns, one would need to analyze aggregated data from the GSA's procurement history, filtering for contracts related to facility renovations, specifically breakrooms, within Judiciary facilities. This analysis would reveal trends in contract values, frequency of such awards, typical contract durations, and whether these projects are typically competed or awarded sole-source. Without such aggregated data, this $44K contract stands in isolation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 47PD5526R0014

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2002 WINNETT ST, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92114

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,396

Exercised Options: $44,396

Current Obligation: $44,396

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline