GSA awards $20,291 environmental consulting contract to MECA CONSULTING INC for asbestos abatement oversight

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,291 ($20.3K)

Contractor: Meca Consulting Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-10-07

Contract Duration: 189 days

Daily Burn Rate: $107/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PREPARE A PROCEDURE 5 WORK PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FLOOD-RELATED DAMAGE IN SUITE 1700. ALSO PROVIDE ON-SITE ABATEMENT OVERSIGHT DURING THE ASBESTOS-RELATED CONSTRUCTION WORK.

Place of Performance

Location: LAGUNA NIGUEL, ORANGE County, CALIFORNIA, 92677

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $20,291 to MECA CONSULTING INC for work described as: PREPARE A PROCEDURE 5 WORK PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FLOOD-RELATED DAMAGE IN SUITE 1700. ALSO PROVIDE ON-SITE ABATEMENT OVERSIGHT DURING THE ASBESTOS-RELATED CONSTRUCTION WORK. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical environmental remediation and oversight for flood-related damage. 2. MECA CONSULTING INC selected for specialized environmental consulting services. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests defined scope and cost control. 4. Contract duration of 189 days indicates a focused, short-term project. 5. Awarded under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), implying a streamlined procurement process. 6. Geographic focus on California highlights regional environmental needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $20,291 is relatively small, typical for specialized consulting services under simplified acquisition procedures. Benchmarking against similar environmental consulting contracts for asbestos abatement oversight suggests this price is within a reasonable range for the scope of work. The firm fixed-price nature provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope is well-defined and manageable.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a limited number of bidders, often through GSA Advantage! or other pre-competed vehicles. While not a full and open competition, SAP aims to ensure fair pricing and access for qualified vendors. The specific competition details (number of bidders, evaluation criteria) are not fully detailed in the provided data, but the use of SAP suggests a balance between efficiency and competition.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, limited competition under SAP can sometimes lead to slightly higher prices than full and open competition, but it also ensures faster delivery of essential services and efficient use of government resources for smaller procurements.

Public Impact

The South Coast Air Quality Management District benefits from expert oversight of asbestos abatement. Residents and workers in Suite 1700 will be protected from environmental hazards during construction. The contract supports environmental remediation efforts in California. The project ensures compliance with environmental regulations during construction activities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if flood damage is more extensive than initially assessed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical oversight may pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost predictability.
Short contract duration limits long-term financial exposure.
Specialized nature of the work suggests MECA CONSULTING INC possesses relevant expertise.

Sector Analysis

Environmental consulting services, particularly those related to hazardous material abatement and construction oversight, represent a niche but critical segment of the professional services sector. This contract falls under the broader category of environmental services, which includes areas like site assessment, remediation, compliance, and consulting. The market for such services is driven by regulatory requirements, infrastructure development, and disaster recovery efforts. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more detail on the specific scope and complexity, but contracts of this size are common for targeted, short-term environmental support.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false) and does not explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses (sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless MECA CONSULTING INC, as a small business itself, utilizes other small businesses for support. Further analysis would be needed to determine the size status of MECA CONSULTING INC and any subcontracting plans.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As a firm fixed-price contract awarded under SAP, the primary oversight mechanism involves ensuring MECA CONSULTING INC adheres to the defined scope of work, timelines, and quality standards. The contract's short duration and specific deliverables likely simplify oversight. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases, and any significant issues would typically be handled through contract administration channels.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Asbestos Abatement
Construction Oversight
Disaster Recovery Services
GSA Professional Services

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep
Contractor performance risk
Limited competition transparency

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $20,291 to MECA CONSULTING INC. PREPARE A PROCEDURE 5 WORK PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE FLOOD-RELATED DAMAGE IN SUITE 1700. ALSO PROVIDE ON-SITE ABATEMENT OVERSIGHT DURING THE ASBESTOS-RELATED CONSTRUCTION WORK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MECA CONSULTING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20,291.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-10-07.

What is the track record of MECA CONSULTING INC with the GSA and other federal agencies?

Information regarding MECA CONSULTING INC's specific track record with the GSA or other federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous government contracts. Understanding their experience with similar environmental consulting projects, particularly those involving asbestos abatement and construction oversight, would be crucial for evaluating their capability and reliability for this specific task. Without this historical data, the assessment relies primarily on the nature of the current award and the assumed expertise required for the stated services.

How does the value of this contract compare to typical environmental consulting engagements for similar scope?

The contract value of $20,291 is relatively modest, which is consistent with its award under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) and its defined scope for a specific work plan and on-site oversight. Typical environmental consulting engagements can range significantly in cost depending on the complexity, duration, and specific services required. For a focused task like preparing a 5-work plan and providing oversight for asbestos-related construction in a specific suite, this value appears reasonable. Larger-scale remediation projects or comprehensive environmental impact studies would command substantially higher figures. Benchmarking against similar SAP-awarded contracts for specialized environmental services would provide a more precise comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential scope creep if the flood-related damage is more extensive than initially assessed, leading to unforeseen complexities in the asbestos abatement work. Another risk is the reliance on a single contractor, MECA CONSULTING INC, for critical oversight, which could lead to performance issues or delays if the contractor encounters internal challenges or fails to meet quality standards. Mitigation strategies likely involve clear contract language defining the scope, robust oversight by the GSA's Public Buildings Service, and potentially contingency planning within the work plan itself. The firm fixed-price nature also incentivizes the contractor to manage scope effectively.

How effective is the competition level for this contract in ensuring value for taxpayers?

This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a limited number of bidders rather than a full and open competition. While SAP is designed to streamline procurement for smaller dollar amounts and ensure fair and reasonable pricing, the reduced number of bidders may limit the potential for aggressive price competition compared to larger, more broadly competed contracts. For taxpayers, this means that while the process is efficient, the government might not achieve the absolute lowest price possible. However, the focus on specialized environmental services suggests that the selection likely prioritized technical capability and timely execution, which are critical for ensuring the effectiveness and safety of the abatement work, thereby providing value beyond just the lowest cost.

What is the historical spending pattern for environmental consulting services by the GSA's Public Buildings Service in California?

Analyzing the historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services by the GSA's Public Buildings Service in California would require access to extensive procurement data beyond the scope of this single contract. Generally, GSA's spending in this area is driven by the maintenance, renovation, and management of federal buildings, which often involves compliance with environmental regulations, including those related to hazardous materials like asbestos. Spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, age of facilities, and specific projects like disaster recovery. Contracts for environmental consulting are common, but their frequency and value vary significantly based on the specific needs of building portfolios in regions like California, which has stringent environmental standards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 47PD5426Q0011

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4683 CHABOT DR STE 380, PLEASANTON, CA, 94588

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,291

Exercised Options: $20,291

Current Obligation: $20,291

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK1721A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline