GSA awards $3.1M contract for ATS investigation and repair at Fort Snelling facility

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,095 ($3.1K)

Contractor: Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-12-19

End Date: 2026-03-13

Contract Duration: 84 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE ATS INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR M013 WILL BE PERFORMED AT THE BISHOP HENRY WHIPPLE FED. BLDG IN FORT SNELLING, MN.

Place of Performance

Location: MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN County, MINNESOTA, 55415

State: Minnesota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,095 to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC for work described as: THE ATS INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR M013 WILL BE PERFORMED AT THE BISHOP HENRY WHIPPLE FED. BLDG IN FORT SNELLING, MN. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential facility maintenance and repair services. 2. Awarded through a broad agency agreement call, indicating a streamlined procurement process. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs and provide predictability. 4. The contract duration is relatively short, suggesting a focused scope of work. 5. The work is geographically concentrated in Minnesota. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.1 million for investigation and repair services appears reasonable for a federal building maintenance task. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts is challenging without more specific details on the scope of 'ATS investigation and repair.' However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the expected costs. The duration of the contract (84 days) also implies a contained project, which can help in managing overall expenditure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the use of a BPA call suggests that pre-qualified vendors may have been solicited. Full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offer.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive process, which is intended to drive down prices and ensure that the government receives high-quality services at a fair market rate.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and users of the Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building in Fort Snelling, MN, who will experience improved facility functionality. The services delivered include investigation and repair of the ATS (likely referring to an Air Traffic System or similar critical infrastructure component). The geographic impact is localized to Fort Snelling, Minnesota. Workforce implications are likely limited to the contractor's employees performing the investigation and repair.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the 'ATS investigation and repair' scope makes it difficult to fully assess value.
The absence of small business participation could be a missed opportunity for economic inclusion.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
The contract is for essential facility maintenance, ensuring operational continuity.

Sector Analysis

The Facilities Support Services sector (NAICS 561210) encompasses a wide range of services for the operation of facilities. This contract falls within the specialized repair and maintenance sub-segment. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, with spending often driven by the need to maintain aging infrastructure and ensure the operational readiness of federal buildings. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve looking at other GSA contracts for similar building systems or repair work across different federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This means that the primary award went to a large business, and opportunities for small business participation may be limited unless the prime contractor voluntarily includes them in their subcontracting plan. The lack of a set-aside or specific subcontracting goals means this contract does not directly contribute to the federal small business contracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. The firm-fixed-price contract type provides a degree of accountability by fixing the total cost. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases where contract awards are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Facilities Operations and Maintenance
General Services Administration (GSA) Contracts
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Ambiguity in 'ATS' definition
Limited information on contractor's past performance for similar tasks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,095 to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC. THE ATS INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR M013 WILL BE PERFORMED AT THE BISHOP HENRY WHIPPLE FED. BLDG IN FORT SNELLING, MN.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,095.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-19. End: 2026-03-13.

What specific system does 'ATS' refer to in this contract, and what is the nature of the investigation and repair required?

The abbreviation 'ATS' in the context of federal building maintenance typically refers to an Air Traffic System or a similar critical infrastructure component. However, without further clarification from the contract documentation or the awarding agency (GSA), its precise meaning remains ambiguous. The investigation likely involves diagnosing issues within this system, which could range from performance degradation to complete failure. The repair phase would then entail rectifying the identified problems, potentially involving component replacement, recalibration, or system overhaul. The scope and complexity of these tasks directly influence the overall cost and timeline of the contract. Understanding the specific nature of ATS is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of the contract's value and the contractor's expertise.

How does the $3.1 million contract value compare to similar federal contracts for building investigation and repair services?

Direct comparison of the $3.1 million contract value is challenging without knowing the exact scope of 'ATS investigation and repair.' However, for context, federal contracts for comprehensive facilities maintenance and repair can range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the size of the facility, the complexity of the systems involved, and the duration of the contract. For instance, a contract for routine HVAC maintenance in a small federal building might be under $100,000, while a major structural repair or upgrade to a large complex could exceed $10 million. Given that this contract is for a specific investigation and repair at a federal building and has a firm-fixed-price structure, $3.1 million suggests a significant, but not exceptionally large, undertaking. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing it to other GSA contracts for similar specialized system repairs in federal buildings of comparable size and age.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Potential risks include scope creep, where the investigation uncovers more issues than initially anticipated, potentially leading to cost overruns if not managed carefully within the fixed-price structure. Another risk is the contractor's technical capability to accurately diagnose and effectively repair the ATS, especially if it's a specialized or proprietary system. Delays in material procurement or unforeseen site conditions could also impact the schedule. Mitigation strategies likely include a detailed statement of work, clear performance metrics, regular progress meetings between GSA and the contractor, and potentially contingency planning within the contract for unforeseen circumstances. The firm-fixed-price nature itself acts as a risk mitigation tool for the government by capping the financial exposure.

What is the track record of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC for federal contracts of this nature is not detailed in the provided data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their past performance on similar GSA or other federal agency contracts, including their history with investigations and repairs of specialized systems. Key factors to examine would include on-time delivery, adherence to budget (especially for fixed-price contracts), quality of work, and any past performance issues or commendations. Without this historical data, it's difficult to definitively assess their reliability and expertise for this specific task.

How does the duration of the contract (84 days) align with the scope of work for ATS investigation and repair?

An 84-day period (approximately three months) for an investigation and repair contract suggests a focused and potentially time-sensitive project. If the 'ATS' system is critical to the building's operations, a shorter duration is often preferred to minimize disruption. However, the feasibility of completing a thorough investigation and all necessary repairs within this timeframe depends heavily on the complexity of the ATS, the extent of the required work, and the availability of parts or specialized labor. If the investigation reveals extensive issues, the 84-day window might be tight, potentially leading to pressure to complete work quickly, which could impact quality, or necessitating contract modifications if the scope significantly exceeds initial estimates.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAF-26-0021

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 998 ELM HILL PIKE, NASHVILLE, TN, 37210

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,095

Exercised Options: $3,095

Current Obligation: $3,095

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PF0025A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline