US Tax Court Seeks $677K Integrated AV Solution for Dallas Courtroom

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $67,727 ($67.7K)

Contractor: Amstar Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-08-08

Contract Duration: 120 days

Daily Burn Rate: $564/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: THE COURT IS SEEKING A COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL FOR AN AUDIO/VIDEO (AV) SOLUTION FOR ONE COURTROOM SPACE LISTED BELOW. THESE AV SOLUTIONS SHOULD BE FULLY INTEGRATED, AT EARLE CABELL, US TAX COURT RM, LOCATED AT 1100 COMMERCE ST., DALLAS, TEXAS, 75242.

Place of Performance

Location: DALLAS, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75242

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $67,727.33 to AMSTAR INC for work described as: THE COURT IS SEEKING A COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL FOR AN AUDIO/VIDEO (AV) SOLUTION FOR ONE COURTROOM SPACE LISTED BELOW. THESE AV SOLUTIONS SHOULD BE FULLY INTEGRATED, AT EARLE CABELL, US TAX COURT RM, LOCATED AT 1100 COMMERCE ST., DALLAS, TEXAS, 75242. Key points: 1. The contract aims to provide a fully integrated audio/video solution for a specific courtroom. 2. Competition method is 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', suggesting a prior limited approach. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the $677K project. 4. The sector is Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, with a specific NAICS code of 236220.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $677,273.30 for a single courtroom AV solution appears to be within a reasonable range for integrated systems. Benchmarking against similar specialized AV installations in government facilities would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The competition method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that while the intent is open competition, specific sources may have been previously considered or excluded. This could impact price discovery if the pool of eligible bidders is narrowed.

Taxpayer Impact: The fixed-price contract aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by setting a clear cost ceiling for the AV solution.

Public Impact

Improved courtroom technology can enhance the efficiency and clarity of legal proceedings. Taxpayers benefit from modern infrastructure that supports judicial functions. The project ensures the US Tax Court in Dallas is equipped with necessary audiovisual capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 56 / 10

Warning Flags

Competition method could limit broader market engagement.
Potential for scope creep in 'comprehensive' AV solutions.
Reliance on a single vendor for integrated systems can create long-term dependencies.

Positive Signals

Clear fixed-price contract type.
Specific project scope for a single courtroom.
Defined delivery and performance periods.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically for outfitting a government facility. Spending benchmarks for similar AV integration projects in courtrooms or public buildings can vary significantly based on complexity and technology chosen.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). There is no specific set-aside for small businesses mentioned in the provided details.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is overseeing this contract through its Public Buildings Service. Standard GSA oversight procedures should ensure accountability and adherence to contract terms.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
General Services Administration Contracting
Public Buildings Service Programs

Risk Flags

Ambiguity in 'comprehensive' AV solution scope.
Potential limitations due to 'exclusion of sources' competition method.
Lack of explicit small business participation.
Dependency on a single vendor for integrated technology.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $67,727.33 to AMSTAR INC. THE COURT IS SEEKING A COMPREHENSIVE PROPOSAL FOR AN AUDIO/VIDEO (AV) SOLUTION FOR ONE COURTROOM SPACE LISTED BELOW. THESE AV SOLUTIONS SHOULD BE FULLY INTEGRATED, AT EARLE CABELL, US TAX COURT RM, LOCATED AT 1100 COMMERCE ST., DALLAS, TEXAS, 75242.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMSTAR INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $67,727.33.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-08-08.

What specific technologies are included in the 'comprehensive' AV solution, and how do they compare to industry standards for modern courtrooms?

The provided data lacks specifics on the AV technologies. A comprehensive solution typically includes high-definition displays, integrated audio systems with microphones and speakers, video conferencing capabilities, and potentially digital evidence presentation tools. Benchmarking against current standards would involve assessing features like 4K resolution, advanced noise cancellation for audio, and seamless integration with case management systems.

What were the reasons for excluding other sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and does this exclusion pose any risk to achieving the best value?

The exclusion of sources typically occurs when prior market research or specific requirements (like unique technical capabilities or past performance) limit the eligible pool. This method risks reducing competition if the exclusion criteria are too narrow or not well-justified, potentially leading to higher prices or less innovative solutions. A thorough justification for exclusion is crucial to mitigate this risk.

How will the effectiveness of the integrated AV solution be measured post-installation to ensure it meets the needs of the US Tax Court?

Effectiveness measurement should involve user acceptance testing (UAT) with court staff and judges, performance validation against specified technical requirements, and potentially post-implementation surveys to gauge user satisfaction and identify any operational issues. Key metrics could include system uptime, ease of use, audio clarity, and video quality during actual proceedings.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PD5226R0028

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1211 PLEASANTON RD, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78214

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $67,727

Exercised Options: $67,727

Current Obligation: $67,727

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PH0824D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline