GSA's $6.9M Facilities Maintenance BPA with EMCOR Government Services shows strong competition and long-term value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,899,900 ($6.9M)

Contractor: Emcor Government Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2020-11-01

End Date: 2026-05-31

Contract Duration: 2,037 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS, WASHINGTON, DC. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA), FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICE SITE COVERAGE. ESTABLISHED AGAINST EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC SCHEDULE CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20032

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $6.9 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC for work described as: ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS, WASHINGTON, DC. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA), FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICE SITE COVERAGE. ESTABLISHED AGAINST EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC SCHEDULE CONTRACT Key points: 1. The contract leverages a pre-negotiated schedule contract, indicating efficient procurement. 2. Fixed-price with economic price adjustment terms offer cost stability with flexibility. 3. The long duration suggests a need for sustained, reliable facilities support. 4. Competition was full and open, likely driving favorable pricing. 5. The contract supports essential operations and maintenance for federal facilities. 6. Geographic focus on Washington D.C. aligns with federal presence.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

This Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) established against a General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule contract suggests a degree of pre-negotiated value. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment structure is common for long-term service contracts, aiming to balance cost certainty with market fluctuations. Benchmarking against similar facilities maintenance contracts would be necessary for a definitive value assessment, but the use of a schedule contract generally implies competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging vendors to offer their best pricing and terms to secure the award. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation is a positive indicator for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a marketplace where the most cost-effective solutions are likely to be selected, preventing potential overspending associated with less competitive procurement methods.

Public Impact

Federal agencies operating at St. Elizabeths West Campus benefit from reliable facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance services. The contract ensures the continued functionality and upkeep of critical federal infrastructure in Washington D.C. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for skilled trades and facility management professionals in the D.C. area. The services provided contribute to the operational readiness and safety of government facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price increases over the contract term due to economic price adjustment clauses.
Reliance on a single contractor for essential facilities services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
The long contract duration may limit opportunities for adopting newer, potentially more cost-effective technologies or service models.

Positive Signals

Established against a GSA Schedule contract, implying pre-vetted vendor and competitive pricing.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
The fixed-price component provides a baseline cost control measure.
Long-term nature of the contract ensures continuity of essential services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and infrastructure. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for upkeep, repair, and operational management of real estate assets across all sectors, including government. This BPA with EMCOR Government Services is a component of the larger federal spending on facilities management, which is critical for maintaining government operations.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits to the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary contractor, EMCOR Government Services, Inc., would be responsible for fulfilling the contract requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. GSA's schedule contracting program includes mechanisms for oversight and performance monitoring. Accountability is managed through contract terms and conditions, with potential for review by agency contracting officers and program managers. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
Facilities Operations and Maintenance Services
Government Building Management
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Long-term contract duration may limit agility in adopting new technologies.
Economic price adjustment clauses introduce potential for cost escalation.
Reliance on a single contractor for essential services carries inherent risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $6.9 million to EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. ST. ELIZABETHS WEST CAMPUS, WASHINGTON, DC. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA), FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICE SITE COVERAGE. ESTABLISHED AGAINST EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC SCHEDULE CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EMCOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-11-01. End: 2026-05-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities maintenance services at St. Elizabeths West Campus under GSA?

Historical spending data for facilities maintenance at St. Elizabeths West Campus prior to this specific BPA is not detailed in the provided information. However, the establishment of this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) against an existing GSA Schedule contract suggests a move towards consolidating or formalizing these services. The total obligated amount for this BPA is $6,899,899.65, with an estimated completion date in May 2026. Analyzing past spending would require access to historical contract awards and call orders issued under previous agreements or other contracts for similar services at this location. Without that granular data, we can infer that the current BPA represents a significant, multi-year commitment to ensuring the operational integrity of the campus facilities.

How does the pricing structure (Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment) compare to industry standards for similar long-term facilities maintenance contracts?

The Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA) pricing structure is a common and often preferred method for long-term service contracts in the facilities maintenance industry. It provides a degree of cost certainty for the government by fixing the base price, while allowing for adjustments based on pre-defined economic factors (e.g., inflation, labor cost indices). This protects the contractor from unforeseen cost increases that could otherwise lead to contract disputes or performance issues. Compared to pure fixed-price contracts, FP-EPA offers more flexibility and is generally seen as a fair way to manage risk over extended periods. Pure cost-plus contracts, while offering maximum flexibility, typically carry higher price uncertainty for the buyer. Therefore, FP-EPA strikes a balance that is widely accepted in the industry for services like facilities maintenance where input costs can fluctuate.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically used to evaluate the success of facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance contracts?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for facilities engineering, operations, and maintenance contracts typically focus on reliability, responsiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety. Common KPIs include: Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) for critical equipment, Mean Time To Repair (MTTR) for service requests, response times for emergency and routine maintenance calls, preventive maintenance completion rates, energy consumption efficiency, occupant satisfaction scores, and compliance with safety regulations (e.g., OSHA). For this specific BPA, the General Services Administration (GSA) would likely have established specific metrics within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS). Evaluating EMCOR Government Services' performance would involve tracking these KPIs against agreed-upon targets to ensure service quality and value for money.

What is EMCOR Government Services' track record with GSA and other federal agencies for similar facilities support services?

EMCOR Government Services, Inc. has a significant track record of performing facilities support services for the federal government, including contracts with the General Services Administration (GSA). As a large government contractor, they typically hold multiple indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts and schedule contracts, enabling them to compete for and perform a wide range of services. Their experience often includes operations and maintenance, base operations support, and specialized facility services across various government installations. A thorough review of their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would provide specific insights into their reliability, quality of service, and adherence to contract terms on previous federal projects. This BPA leverages their established presence within the GSA Schedule framework.

What is the potential impact of the long contract duration (ending May 2026) on technological adoption and innovation in facilities management?

The contract duration, extending to May 2026, provides a stable, long-term engagement for EMCOR Government Services, which can be beneficial for consistent service delivery. However, such extended periods can sometimes present challenges for rapid technological adoption and innovation. While the contract allows for economic price adjustments, it may not fully incentivize the contractor to proactively invest in and introduce cutting-edge technologies unless explicitly required or highly beneficial within the existing framework. Agencies often need to actively manage these contracts, potentially through modifications or future solicitations, to ensure that the latest advancements in smart building technology, energy efficiency, or predictive maintenance are incorporated. The fixed-price nature, even with adjustments, might create a preference for proven, established methods over riskier, novel solutions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Miller Electric Company

Address: 6363 WALKER LN, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,848,187

Exercised Options: $6,899,900

Current Obligation: $6,899,900

Actual Outlays: $129,028

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $404,505

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0319A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline