GSA awards $62.6K contract for Hoffman Courthouse building water intrusion study in Norfolk, VA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $62,573 ($62.6K)

Contractor: WDP & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-05-12

End Date: 2026-05-01

Contract Duration: 354 days

Daily Burn Rate: $177/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BUILDING ENVELOP SERVICES TO STUDY THE HOFFMAN COURTHOUSE BUILDING WATER INTRUSION. THIS STUDY WILL BE LOCATED AT NORFOLK, VA.

Place of Performance

Location: NORFOLK, NORFOLK CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23510

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $62,573.06 to WDP & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. for work described as: BUILDING ENVELOP SERVICES TO STUDY THE HOFFMAN COURTHOUSE BUILDING WATER INTRUSION. THIS STUDY WILL BE LOCATED AT NORFOLK, VA. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on a specific building issue, suggesting targeted problem-solving. 2. The engineering services sector is characterized by specialized expertise and varying project scales. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for this defined scope. 4. Short performance period indicates a focused, potentially quick-resolution effort. 5. The awardee has experience in engineering services, relevant to the contract's needs. 6. Geographic focus on Norfolk, VA, highlights localized infrastructure concerns.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $62,573.06 appears reasonable for a specialized engineering study of building water intrusion. Benchmarking against similar studies for building envelope assessments in federal facilities suggests this is within a typical range for a project of this scope and duration. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope is well-defined.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded for defined reasons. The exact number of bidders is not provided, but this competition type suggests a limited number of qualified firms were likely considered. This approach can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing compared to unrestricted full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may mean taxpayers did not benefit from the most competitive pricing achievable through a wider bidding pool.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the General Services Administration (GSA) and the occupants of the Hoffman Courthouse. The service delivered is a specialized engineering study to identify and analyze water intrusion issues. The geographic impact is localized to Norfolk, Virginia, specifically addressing the Hoffman Courthouse. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team of specialized engineers from the awarded firm.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition could result in higher costs for taxpayers.
Lack of transparency on specific reasons for excluding sources hinders full understanding of competition dynamics.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost control for a defined scope.
Specialized engineering expertise is being procured to address a specific building issue.
Short duration suggests a focused and potentially efficient resolution.

Sector Analysis

The engineering services sector is diverse, encompassing a wide range of specialized consulting and technical support. This contract falls within the architectural and engineering services sub-sector, often characterized by project-based work requiring specific technical expertise. Federal spending in this area supports infrastructure maintenance, upgrades, and new construction across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar building envelope studies can vary significantly based on building size, complexity, and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside or requirement for this award (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular contract's structure.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified study within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed justifications for limited competition are not always readily available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Architectural and Engineering Services
Infrastructure Assessment Contracts
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition may impact price discovery.
Justification for exclusion of sources not detailed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $62,573.06 to WDP & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.. BUILDING ENVELOP SERVICES TO STUDY THE HOFFMAN COURTHOUSE BUILDING WATER INTRUSION. THIS STUDY WILL BE LOCATED AT NORFOLK, VA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WDP & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $62,573.06.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-05-12. End: 2026-05-01.

What is the track record of WDP & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. with the federal government?

WDP & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. has a history of performing engineering services for the federal government. While this specific award is for a relatively small amount, their presence in the federal contracting space indicates experience with government procurement processes and requirements. Further analysis would involve examining their past performance ratings, the types and values of previous contracts, and any reported issues or successes to fully assess their track record. Understanding their broader portfolio can provide context for their capability to execute this specific study effectively.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar building envelope studies?

The contract value of $62,573.06 for a building water intrusion study is on the lower end for comprehensive engineering assessments, especially for larger federal facilities. However, its suitability depends heavily on the specific scope and complexity of the water intrusion issues at the Hoffman Courthouse. For a focused study addressing a particular problem area or a smaller section of the building, this value could be appropriate. Larger, more complex investigations involving extensive testing, multiple building systems, or detailed remediation planning would typically command higher contract values, potentially ranging from several hundred thousand to over a million dollars.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks for this contract include scope creep, where the study's requirements expand beyond the initial definition, potentially leading to cost overruns or delays, although the firm-fixed-price mitigates direct cost increases. Another risk is the accuracy and completeness of the engineering analysis; if the study fails to accurately diagnose the water intrusion causes, subsequent remediation efforts could be ineffective or costly. Contractor performance risk also exists, though the limited competition may reduce the pool of highly qualified firms. Finally, the 'exclusion of sources' aspect of the competition introduces a risk that the government may not have secured the absolute best value due to a narrowed bidding field.

How effective is the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' approach for this type of service?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' approach is intended to balance the benefits of broad competition with the need to potentially utilize specialized capabilities or address specific market conditions. For highly specialized engineering services like building envelope studies, it can be effective if the exclusion of certain sources is well-justified (e.g., lack of capability, past performance issues). However, it inherently limits the number of potential bidders compared to unrestricted full and open competition. Its effectiveness hinges on whether the excluded sources were truly unnecessary or if their exclusion prevented a more competitive outcome and potentially better pricing for the government.

What is the historical spending pattern for engineering services by the GSA Public Buildings Service?

The General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service (PBS) historically spends significant amounts on architectural and engineering (A&E) services to manage its vast portfolio of federal buildings. This spending covers a wide range of needs, from design and construction oversight to specialized studies like the one awarded here. Annual spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, modernization projects, and repair requirements. While specific figures for 'building water intrusion studies' are not readily isolated, overall A&E spending by PBS is in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually, reflecting the scale of their operations and the ongoing need for expert technical support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Solicitation ID: 47PD0125R0002

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10621 GATEWAY BLVD STE 200, MANASSAS, VA, 20110

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $62,573

Exercised Options: $62,573

Current Obligation: $62,573

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0123D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline