GSA awards $807,800 for drywall repair at Baltimore courthouse, completed in 120 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,078 ($8.1K)

Contractor: LG Construction Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 120 days

Daily Burn Rate: $67/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 9TH FLOOR DRYWALL REPAIR, GARMATZ COURTHOUSE, BALTIMORE, MD. 120 CALENDAR DAYS

Place of Performance

Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21201

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,078 to LG CONSTRUCTION INC for work described as: 9TH FLOOR DRYWALL REPAIR, GARMATZ COURTHOUSE, BALTIMORE, MD. 120 CALENDAR DAYS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized construction services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract limits cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Project duration is clearly defined, aiding performance monitoring. 5. Focus on building construction aligns with agency mission. 6. Small business participation is not explicitly indicated.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $807,800 for drywall repair at the Garmatz Courthouse in Baltimore seems within a reasonable range for commercial and institutional building construction. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is advantageous as it transfers most of the cost risk to the contractor, LG Construction Inc. The defined 120-day performance period allows for clear tracking of progress and timely completion.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is expected to lead to more favorable pricing and better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces, rather than being inflated by a lack of choice.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the General Services Administration (GSA) and the users of the Garmatz Courthouse, who will benefit from improved facilities. The service delivered is essential building maintenance and repair, specifically drywall work. The geographic impact is localized to Baltimore, Maryland. Workforce implications include employment for skilled tradespeople involved in construction and repair.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific detail on the number of bidders limits full assessment of competition intensity.
Absence of explicit small business subcontracting goals requires further investigation into potential impacts.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Defined performance period aids in schedule management.
Procurement method suggests a competitive bidding process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector (NAICS 236220). This sector encompasses establishments primarily engaged in the construction or remodeling of nonresidential buildings. The market for such services is driven by government facility maintenance needs, private sector development, and infrastructure upgrades. The GSA, as the primary landlord for the U.S. government, frequently awards contracts for repairs and maintenance to ensure the functionality and safety of federal buildings.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SS: false, SB: false). While the primary contract was not a small business set-aside, it is possible that LG Construction Inc. may engage small businesses as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were mandated or voluntarily pursued, and what impact this has on the broader small business ecosystem supporting federal construction.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight mechanisms likely include contract administration by the GSA's Public Buildings Service, performance monitoring against the defined 120-day schedule, and adherence to the firm-fixed-price terms. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though specific details on day-to-day oversight activities are not provided. The Inspector General of the GSA would have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if any irregularities were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
GSA Public Buildings Service Projects
Commercial Construction Services
Drywall Installation and Repair

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen structural issues during repair.
Contractor performance and adherence to schedule.
Adequacy of competition level without specific bidder count.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,078 to LG CONSTRUCTION INC. 9TH FLOOR DRYWALL REPAIR, GARMATZ COURTHOUSE, BALTIMORE, MD. 120 CALENDAR DAYS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LG CONSTRUCTION INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,078.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the track record of LG Construction Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the GSA?

Information regarding the specific track record of LG Construction Inc. with federal contracts, especially with the General Services Administration (GSA), is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive review would involve examining past performance evaluations, any history of contract disputes or terminations, and the types and values of previous contracts awarded to this company. Understanding their experience with similar projects, such as courthouse or federal building renovations, would also be crucial for assessing their capability and reliability in executing this current drywall repair contract effectively and efficiently.

How does the awarded amount of $807,800 compare to similar drywall repair projects in the Baltimore area or for federal courthouses?

Without specific benchmark data for comparable drywall repair projects in Baltimore or for federal courthouses, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the value of $807,800 for a 120-day project suggests a significant scope of work. Factors influencing cost include the square footage of drywall to be repaired or replaced, the complexity of the existing structure, the need for specialized materials, and labor rates in the Baltimore region. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that LG Construction Inc. has factored these costs, including overhead and profit, into their bid. Further analysis would require access to a database of similar construction project costs.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential delays in project completion (though mitigated by the fixed 120-day schedule), unforeseen structural issues discovered during the repair process, and contractor performance issues. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract structure is a key mitigation strategy, as it places the financial risk of cost overruns primarily on the contractor, LG Construction Inc. The GSA's oversight, performance monitoring against the schedule, and the requirement for adherence to construction standards also serve to mitigate risks. The 'Full and Open Competition' method also reduces the risk of awarding the contract to an unqualified bidder.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in ensuring value for money for this specific project?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method is generally effective in ensuring value for money because it allows all responsible contractors to compete, fostering price discovery and innovation. By excluding only specific sources, it broadens the competitive pool compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario. This increased competition typically drives down prices and encourages contractors to offer the best possible terms and quality to win the bid. For this drywall repair project, it suggests that the GSA likely received multiple competitive bids, leading to a price that reflects market rates and contractor efficiency.

What is the historical spending pattern for building construction and repair by the GSA's Public Buildings Service in Maryland?

Historical spending patterns for building construction and repair by the GSA's Public Buildings Service in Maryland would typically show consistent investment in maintaining and modernizing federal facilities within the state. This includes a range of projects from minor repairs, like drywall work, to major renovations and new constructions. Analyzing past GSA spending in Maryland would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured (e.g., HVAC, electrical, structural repairs), and the frequency of awards to specific contractors or categories of construction firms. Such data would help contextualize the $807,800 award for the Garmatz Courthouse project within the broader fiscal landscape of federal building management in the region.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PC5426Q0053

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 636 BROAD ST STE 107, PERRYVILLE, MD, 21903

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,078

Exercised Options: $8,078

Current Obligation: $8,078

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0122D0012

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline