GSA awards $441K for courthouse concrete repair, completed in 120 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,131 ($44.1K)

Contractor: Ccsi - Dubois Construction JV, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 120 days

Daily Burn Rate: $368/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: SPALLING CONCRETE REPAIR, 120 CALENDAR DAYS, GARMATZ COURTHOUSE, MD.

Place of Performance

Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21201

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $44,131.12 to CCSI - DUBOIS CONSTRUCTION JV, LLC for work described as: SPALLING CONCRETE REPAIR, 120 CALENDAR DAYS, GARMATZ COURTHOUSE, MD. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized repair work. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Short performance period indicates a focused scope of work. 4. Worksite located in Maryland, impacting local construction resources. 5. Contract type is firm-fixed-price, transferring risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $441,311.12 for spalling concrete repair at the Garmatz Courthouse seems within a reasonable range for specialized construction services. Benchmarking against similar federal repair projects of this scale and complexity would provide further validation. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has assessed risks and costs, and the price reflects this.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and multiple bids were likely considered. While the specific number of bidders isn't provided, this method generally fosters price discovery and allows for a wider range of qualified contractors to participate, potentially leading to better pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple firms to offer their best pricing and technical solutions, driving down costs and ensuring value for money.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the General Services Administration (GSA) and users of the Garmatz Courthouse, ensuring a safe and functional facility. The service delivered is critical infrastructure repair, specifically addressing spalling concrete. The geographic impact is localized to Maryland, where the Garmatz Courthouse is situated. The contract supports the construction workforce, likely employing skilled tradespeople for the repair work.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions in concrete repair that could impact cost or schedule.
Dependence on specialized materials and skilled labor for effective repair.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
Defined performance period (120 days) provides clear schedule expectations.
Full and open competition suggests a robust vetting of potential contractors.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector (NAICS 236220). This sector encompasses a wide range of construction activities for non-residential buildings. Federal spending in this area is consistent, driven by the need to maintain and upgrade government facilities across the country. The market size for such specialized repair services is substantial, with numerous firms capable of undertaking these projects.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is a joint venture, it's unclear if this entity itself qualifies as a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were made available to small businesses, which could impact the broader small business construction ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. Mechanisms likely include contract performance monitoring, site inspections, and adherence to the firm-fixed-price agreement. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases, and the Inspector General's office would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud or mismanagement.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Public Infrastructure Repair
GSA Courthouse Modernization Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions impacting repair scope and cost.
Contractor's past performance and experience with similar federal projects.
Adequacy of competition level for ensuring optimal pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $44,131.12 to CCSI - DUBOIS CONSTRUCTION JV, LLC. SPALLING CONCRETE REPAIR, 120 CALENDAR DAYS, GARMATZ COURTHOUSE, MD.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CCSI - DUBOIS CONSTRUCTION JV, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44,131.12.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the track record of CCSI - DUBOIS CONSTRUCTION JV, LLC with the GSA or similar federal agencies?

A comprehensive review of CCSI - DUBOIS CONSTRUCTION JV, LLC's past performance with the GSA and other federal agencies would be crucial. This includes examining their history of completing similar construction projects on time, within budget, and to required specifications. Analyzing past contract awards, performance evaluations, and any documented disputes or corrective actions would provide insight into their reliability and capability for executing this specific concrete repair project effectively. Without specific historical data on this joint venture, it's difficult to definitively assess their track record.

How does the awarded price compare to similar concrete repair projects in Maryland?

Benchmarking the $441,311.12 award against similar spalling concrete repair projects in Maryland, particularly those involving federal courthouses or similar public buildings, is essential for value assessment. Factors such as square footage repaired, severity of damage, specific materials used, and labor rates in the region would need to be considered for a fair comparison. If comparable projects show significantly lower or higher costs for similar scope and quality, it could indicate potential overpricing or exceptional value. Data from federal contract databases and industry cost estimators can aid in this comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with spalling concrete repair, and how are they mitigated in this contract?

Spalling concrete repair carries inherent risks, including the potential for underlying structural issues not immediately apparent, weather-related delays, and material availability. This contract's firm-fixed-price structure mitigates financial risk for the government by capping the total cost. The 120-day performance period suggests a defined scope, and the 'Full and Open Competition' likely ensured the selection of a contractor with demonstrated expertise in managing such risks. However, the government still bears the risk of scope creep or unforeseen conditions requiring contract modifications.

What is the expected impact of this repair on the Garmatz Courthouse's operational capacity?

The repair of spalling concrete is critical for maintaining the structural integrity and safety of the Garmatz Courthouse. Addressing this issue prevents further deterioration, which could lead to more extensive and costly repairs, or even compromise the building's usability. While the repair work itself might cause temporary disruptions or require partial closures of specific areas, the long-term impact is positive, ensuring the courthouse can continue to serve its function reliably and safely for judges, staff, and the public.

What has been the historical spending pattern for building maintenance and repair by the GSA in Maryland?

Analyzing historical GSA spending on building maintenance and repair in Maryland would provide context for this $441K contract. Understanding the average contract values, frequency of similar repair projects, and the distribution of spending across different types of facilities (e.g., courthouses, office buildings) can reveal trends. If this award is significantly higher or lower than historical averages for comparable work, it warrants further investigation. This historical data helps assess whether current spending aligns with past patterns or represents a deviation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PC5426Q0052

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 107 ENGLEFIELD DR, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20878

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $44,131

Exercised Options: $44,131

Current Obligation: $44,131

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0122D0009

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline