Parking lot gate repair contract awarded to Fedcap Rehabilitation Services for $19,270
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,270 ($19.3K)
Contractor: Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-07
End Date: 2026-06-06
Contract Duration: 60 days
Daily Burn Rate: $321/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: REPAIR RODINO PARKING LOT GATES-30 EAST KINNEY ST.
Place of Performance
Location: NEWARK, ESSEX County, NEW JERSEY, 07102
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $19,269.6 to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC for work described as: REPAIR RODINO PARKING LOT GATES-30 EAST KINNEY ST. Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the scope of repairing parking lot gates. 2. The contract was not competed, raising questions about potential price discovery. 3. Limited competition could indicate a higher price than a fully competed contract. 4. Performance is tied to a fixed-price delivery order, aligning incentives. 5. This contract falls within Facilities Support Services, a broad sector. 6. The duration of 60 days suggests a focused, short-term repair effort.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $19,270 for parking lot gate repair is relatively small. Benchmarking against similar, specific gate repair contracts is difficult without more detailed service descriptions. However, the fixed-price nature suggests the government is paying a set amount for the defined scope, which can be a good value if the scope is well-defined and the price is competitive for the services rendered. Without competitive bidding, it's hard to definitively assess if this represents the best possible price.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded under a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' (NAF) designation, which typically implies a sole-source award. This means only one vendor was solicited. The specific justification for this sole-source award is not provided in the data. Limited competition, especially sole-source awards, can reduce the government's ability to secure the lowest possible price due to the absence of market pressure from multiple bidders.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards mean taxpayers may not be getting the most competitive pricing available in the market, as there was no opportunity for multiple vendors to bid and drive down costs.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is the General Services Administration (GSA) facility at 30 East Kinney St., Newark, NJ, which will have its parking lot gates repaired. The service delivered is the repair of existing parking lot gates. The geographic impact is localized to Newark, New Jersey. There are no immediate workforce implications indicated by this contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition limits price discovery and potentially increases cost to taxpayers.
- The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status requires a strong justification to ensure necessity and fairness.
- The specific nature of the repair is not detailed, making it hard to assess if the scope is appropriate for the price.
Positive Signals
- The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, which caps the government's financial exposure.
- The contract duration is short (60 days), indicating a focused and potentially efficient execution.
- The awardee, Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc., is an established entity, suggesting some level of reliability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Facilities Support Services sector, which is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. The market for these services is diverse, ranging from large facility management companies to specialized repair firms. The value of this specific contract is small relative to the overall government spending in this sector, which includes everything from janitorial services to major infrastructure maintenance. Comparable spending benchmarks for specific gate repairs are not readily available without more granular data.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded to a small business, nor does it appear to have a small business set-aside component (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans. Therefore, this specific award does not directly contribute to the small business ecosystem through set-asides or mandated subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle (though the base contract type is not specified), oversight would focus on ensuring the work is completed according to the terms and specifications of the delivery order. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature and lack of detailed public justification. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
- GSA Facility Management Services
- Parking Infrastructure Maintenance
- Repair and Alterations Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award without clear justification
- Potential for non-competitive pricing
- Limited transparency on scope and vendor qualifications
Tags
facilities-support-services, general-services-administration, new-jersey, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, sole-source, repair, parking-lot, small-value-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $19,269.6 to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. REPAIR RODINO PARKING LOT GATES-30 EAST KINNEY ST.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19,269.6.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-06-06.
What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was awarded under 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' (NAF), signifying a sole-source procurement. However, the specific justification for this determination is not included in the data. Typically, NAF awards are made when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, often due to unique capabilities, urgent needs, or specific statutory authority. Without the detailed justification document, it is impossible to ascertain the precise reasons GSA deemed it necessary to bypass full and open competition for the repair of these parking lot gates. This lack of transparency is a key concern for assessing value and fairness.
How does the price of $19,270 compare to market rates for similar parking lot gate repairs?
Directly comparing the $19,270 price to market rates for similar parking lot gate repairs is challenging without more specific details about the scope of work, the type and complexity of the gates, and the specific components requiring repair. The contract is for a fixed price, covering the repair of gates at a specific GSA facility. Market rates can vary significantly based on geographic location, labor costs, and the extent of the damage or required upgrades. Given the sole-source nature, it's difficult to definitively state if this price represents the best market value. A fully competed contract would provide a clearer benchmark through multiple bids.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for facility maintenance?
The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for facility maintenance, such as this parking lot gate repair, is the potential for inflated pricing. Without competition, the awarded contractor faces less pressure to offer the most cost-effective solution. Another risk is limited vendor options, which could lead to delays if the sole source is unable to perform or if specialized parts are needed. Furthermore, the lack of competitive vetting might mean less assurance regarding the contractor's overall quality, reliability, or adherence to best practices compared to a scenario where multiple vendors are evaluated. Transparency is also reduced, making it harder to justify the expenditure.
What is Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc.'s track record with GSA or similar federal contracts?
Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, often related to providing services through supported employment models for individuals with disabilities. While their primary focus may not be direct facility repair, they often subcontract or manage services. Information on their specific performance history for facility maintenance contracts, particularly gate repairs, is not detailed in the provided data. A deeper dive into their contract performance ratings, past performance questionnaires, and any debriefings from previous GSA solicitations would be necessary to fully assess their track record for this specific type of work.
How does this contract fit into the broader context of GSA's facilities management spending?
This $19,270 contract for parking lot gate repair represents a very small fraction of the General Services Administration's overall facilities management budget. GSA is responsible for a vast portfolio of federal buildings and grounds across the country, requiring continuous maintenance, repair, and upgrades. Spending in this category typically includes a wide array of services, from routine cleaning and landscaping to major structural repairs and energy efficiency upgrades. While this specific contract is minor, it is part of a larger ecosystem of contracts GSA utilizes to maintain its real property assets, ensuring operational functionality and safety for federal facilities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: EQPMAD-26-0183
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 633 3RD AVE FL 6, NEW YORK, NY, 10017
Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,270
Exercised Options: $19,270
Current Obligation: $19,270
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47PC0725D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-07
Current End Date: 2026-06-06
Potential End Date: 2026-06-06 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-03
More Contracts from Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc
- Manhattan Campus Custodial Services — $109.2M (General Services Administration)
- Base Period Janitorial Services Contract for Manhattan, GSA PBS Region 2 — $87.4M (General Services Administration)
- Janitorial and Related Services for ONE and 26 Federal Plaza and Howard Street Garage, NEW York, NY the Subject Task Order IS Hereby Issued Under Contract NO. Gs-02p-09-Pv-D-0013 to Order Basic Services (monthly Services) for the Base Year and for Four (4) Follow-On Years. ALL Prices ARE Interim Prices Subject to Further Negotiation — $56.9M (General Services Administration)
- Center Operations and Maintenance Contract for William J. Hughes Technical Center — $50.6M (Department of Transportation)
- Center Operations and Maintenance Contract Base Period of Performance 11/01/15-10/31/16 TAS:: ::TAS Igf::cl::igf Igf::cl::igf — $46.4M (Department of Transportation)
View all Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc federal contracts →
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)