GSA awards $3.7M construction management contract to Amentum Technology for Houlton LPOE project
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,717,253 ($3.7M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2023-11-22
End Date: 2027-12-17
Contract Duration: 1,486 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: THIS AWARD IS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS AGENT (CMA) AND COMMISSIONING SERVICES (CXP) IN SUPPORT OF THE HOULTON LPOE PROJECT.
Place of Performance
Location: TULLAHOMA, COFFEE County, TENNESSEE, 37388
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $3.7 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: THIS AWARD IS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS AGENT (CMA) AND COMMISSIONING SERVICES (CXP) IN SUPPORT OF THE HOULTON LPOE PROJECT. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on construction management and commissioning services, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. The contract duration of approximately 4 years allows for comprehensive project oversight. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, potentially stabilizing costs. 5. The project is located in Tennessee, suggesting a regional focus for this federal investment. 6. The use of a BPA Call indicates a pre-negotiated framework agreement was leveraged for this award.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $3.7 million for construction management and commissioning services over nearly four years appears reasonable for a federal project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar projects managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control, assuming the scope is well-defined. Without specific details on the project's complexity or scale, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the initial figures do not raise immediate red flags.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the nature of the competition suggests that multiple firms likely vied for this opportunity. This level of competition is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovative solutions, leading to better value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the General Services Administration and potentially the Department of Homeland Security (as LPOEs often serve border functions), ensuring the successful completion of the Houlton LPOE project. The services delivered include construction management and commissioning, crucial for the effective and efficient execution of the construction project. The geographic impact is localized to Houlton, Tennessee, where the new port of entry facility is being developed. Workforce implications may include the creation of construction-related jobs in the Houlton area, as well as roles for Amentum Technology's project management and engineering staff.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the number of bidders in the full and open competition makes it difficult to fully assess the intensity of competition.
- The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics or quality standards expected for the construction management and commissioning services.
- Information regarding potential cost overruns or change orders under the firm-fixed-price contract is not available at this stage.
Positive Signals
- The use of full and open competition suggests a commitment to achieving competitive pricing and best value.
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, assuming the scope is well-defined.
- The contract duration allows for comprehensive oversight and management of the construction lifecycle.
- The award to Amentum Technology, Inc. leverages an existing BPA Call, indicating a streamlined procurement process.
Sector Analysis
The construction services sector is a significant area of federal spending, encompassing a wide range of projects from infrastructure to facility upgrades. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major player in managing federal building construction and renovation. This contract for construction management and commissioning services fits within the broader engineering and architectural services NAICS code (541330), reflecting the specialized expertise required for complex projects. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar-sized construction management contracts managed by GSA would typically range from a few hundred thousand to several million dollars, depending on project scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, but this is not mandated by the contract's set-aside status. Further analysis would require examining Amentum's subcontracting plan, if one exists.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), likely through its Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, which incentivize the contractor to adhere to the agreed-upon scope and budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through GSA's contract award databases and reporting. Inspector General jurisdiction would typically fall under the GSA's Office of Inspector General, which investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in GSA programs and contracts.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Port of Entry Construction Projects
- GSA Public Buildings Service Construction Management
- Commissioning Services for Federal Facilities
- BPA Call Procurements
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep in fixed-price contracts
- Adequacy of competition level not fully detailed
- Lack of specific performance metrics in award notice
Tags
construction, general-services-administration, tennessee, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, engineering-services, bpa-call, construction-management, commissioning-services, port-of-entry
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $3.7 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. THIS AWARD IS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS AGENT (CMA) AND COMMISSIONING SERVICES (CXP) IN SUPPORT OF THE HOULTON LPOE PROJECT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-11-22. End: 2027-12-17.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the GSA on similar construction management projects?
A review of publicly available contract data indicates that Amentum Technology, Inc. has a history of performing various services for federal agencies, including the GSA. While specific details on their past performance on construction management and commissioning projects for GSA are not provided in this award notice, their selection suggests they met the agency's requirements. To fully assess their track record, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, any reported disputes or contract terminations, and the overall success of their previous GSA engagements. This information is often available through sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or through agency-specific performance assessment tools, though direct access may be limited.
How does the $3.7 million contract value compare to similar construction management contracts awarded by the GSA?
The $3.7 million contract value for construction management and commissioning services over approximately four years is within a typical range for federal projects of moderate complexity managed by the GSA. Without knowing the exact scope, size, and specific requirements of the Houlton LPOE project, a precise comparison is difficult. However, GSA often awards contracts in the low millions for such services. For larger, more complex projects, values can extend into tens or hundreds of millions. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests a well-defined scope, which can influence the overall cost. Benchmarking against other GSA construction management awards for similar facility types or project durations would provide a more robust comparison.
What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for construction management services?
The primary risk with a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract, especially for construction management, is the potential for scope creep or unforeseen issues that were not adequately captured in the initial scope definition. While FFP shifts cost risk to the contractor, if the government requires significant changes or if unforeseen site conditions arise, it can lead to contentious change order negotiations or potential disputes. Another risk is that the contractor might cut corners on quality or oversight to maintain profitability if the fixed price is too low or if project challenges emerge. Robust government oversight and a clearly defined SOW are crucial to mitigate these risks.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach likely to be in ensuring value for this specific project?
The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for taxpayer dollars, as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders and encourages competitive pricing. For this construction management contract, it implies that multiple qualified firms had the opportunity to bid, theoretically driving down the price and improving the quality of proposals received. The effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation documents, the evaluation criteria, and the actual number and caliber of bids received. If the competition was robust, it significantly increases the likelihood of achieving best value. However, the specific effectiveness cannot be fully determined without knowing the number of bids and the details of the evaluation process.
What are the historical spending patterns for construction management services by the GSA in recent years?
The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently spends significant amounts on construction management and related services annually to maintain and upgrade its vast portfolio of federal buildings. Historical data shows GSA's spending in this category often runs into the hundreds of millions, and sometimes billions, of dollars across numerous projects nationwide. This spending fluctuates based on infrastructure needs, new construction initiatives, and budget allocations. The use of mechanisms like Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) and task orders, as seen with this award (BPA CALL), is a common strategy GSA employs to manage this spending efficiently and rapidly procure necessary services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,717,253
Exercised Options: $3,717,253
Current Obligation: $3,717,253
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 5
Total Subaward Amount: $663,465
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47PB0023A0001
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-11-22
Current End Date: 2027-12-17
Potential End Date: 2027-12-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-24
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)