VA awards $482K for journal subscriptions, raising questions about competition and value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $48,206 ($48.2K)
Contractor: Graham Advisory Network Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Start Date: 2024-04-18
End Date: 2027-04-17
Contract Duration: 1,094 days
Daily Burn Rate: $44/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION
Place of Performance
Location: RALEIGH, WAKE County, NORTH CAROLINA, 27609
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $48,206 to GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC for work described as: AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION Key points: 1. The contract for journal subscriptions appears to be a sole-source award, potentially limiting price discovery. 2. The duration of the contract (nearly three years) suggests a need for ongoing access to information. 3. The specific nature of the 'AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION' needs further clarification regarding its necessity and alternatives. 4. The award to GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC, a firm not typically associated with subscription services, warrants scrutiny. 5. The lack of competition raises concerns about whether the VA secured the best possible price. 6. The contract's value is relatively small in the context of overall federal spending, but the principles of competition and value remain important.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of journal subscriptions is challenging without knowing the specific titles and access provided. However, the lack of competition for this $482,060 award is a significant concern. Typically, such services would be procured through competitive bidding to ensure fair market pricing. The award to GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC, whose primary NAICS code is 'Web Search Portals and All Other Information Services,' is unusual for subscription services, suggesting a potential lack of specialized expertise or a non-standard procurement route. Without comparative pricing data or a clear justification for the sole-source award, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded as 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), indicating it was not competed. The data explicitly states it was not competed, implying a sole-source or limited competition scenario. The absence of a competitive process means that multiple vendors were not given the opportunity to bid, which can lead to higher prices and less innovation. The VA did not provide details on why this contract was not competed, which is a missed opportunity for price discovery and ensuring the best value for taxpayer dollars.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may have paid more than necessary for these journal subscriptions. Without a competitive environment, there is less pressure on the contractor to offer the lowest possible price.
Public Impact
Veterans Affairs medical professionals and researchers will likely benefit from access to the AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY JOURNAL. The services delivered are subscriptions to a specific professional journal, crucial for staying updated on medical advancements. The geographic impact is likely national, supporting VA facilities and personnel across the country. Workforce implications include ensuring medical staff have access to current research to inform patient care and treatment strategies.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition for a sole-source award.
- Unusual contractor selection for subscription services.
- Potential for overpayment due to non-competitive award.
Positive Signals
- Ensures access to critical medical research for VA staff.
- Contract is a firm-fixed-price, providing cost certainty.
- Awarded to a US-based company.
Sector Analysis
The market for information services and subscriptions is vast, encompassing a wide range of providers from large aggregators to specialized publishers. Federal agencies, particularly in healthcare and research sectors like the Department of Veterans Affairs, regularly procure access to journals, databases, and research platforms. The total federal spending on information services is substantial, with significant portions allocated to IT and research-related acquisitions. This contract, though small in dollar value, fits within the broader category of information acquisition necessary for maintaining a knowledgeable workforce and advancing medical understanding.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not competed and there is no indication of a small business set-aside. Therefore, it does not appear to directly benefit small businesses through this specific award. Subcontracting implications are unknown given the sole-source nature. The impact on the small business ecosystem is negligible for this particular transaction, as it bypassed standard competitive processes where small businesses might have had an opportunity to bid.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting and program management offices. As a purchase order under simplified acquisition procedures, the level of formal oversight might be less intensive than for larger, more complex contracts. Accountability measures would rely on the VA's internal controls and the contractor's performance in delivering the subscribed content. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature and lack of public justification for the procurement method.
Related Government Programs
- VA Medical Information Systems
- Federal Research and Development Spending
- Information Technology Services
- Professional Journal Subscriptions
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award without clear justification.
- Contractor's primary NAICS code does not align with service provided.
- Potential for non-competitive pricing.
- Lack of transparency in procurement process.
Tags
healthcare, department-of-veterans-affairs, purchase-order, sole-source, information-services, journal-subscription, firm-fixed-price, small-value, non-competed
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $48,206 to GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC. AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $48,206.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-04-18. End: 2027-04-17.
What specific journal(s) does this subscription cover, and what is the justification for procuring them through GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC?
The provided data only specifies 'AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION' as the description. It does not detail the specific titles included or the rationale for awarding the contract to GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC, especially given their NAICS code relates to 'Web Search Portals and All Other Information Services.' A thorough review would require the VA to provide the specific list of journals and a detailed justification for the sole-source award, including why GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC was selected over specialized subscription agents or direct publisher agreements. This information is crucial for assessing the necessity and value of the procurement.
How does the pricing of this subscription compare to market rates for similar journal access, especially considering the lack of competition?
Direct price comparison is difficult without knowing the exact journals and access levels provided. However, the absence of competition is a significant red flag for price benchmarking. Typically, competitive bidding allows agencies to solicit multiple quotes and negotiate based on market rates. A sole-source award, especially to a non-specialized vendor, increases the risk that the VA paid a premium. To assess value, the VA should have conducted a price analysis based on historical data, commercial price lists, or other comparable federal contracts. Without this, it's presumed the price may not be the most advantageous.
What is GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC's track record in providing subscription services or managing information resources for federal agencies?
The provided data indicates GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC's primary NAICS code is 'Web Search Portals and All Other Information Services' (519290). This suggests their core business is not typically subscription management or journal aggregation. Their track record in providing these specific services to federal agencies, or any agency for that matter, is not detailed here. Further investigation would be needed to ascertain their experience and past performance in this niche area. The unusual pairing of contractor and service raises questions about their qualifications and potential conflicts of interest.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a subscription service contract to a company not specializing in this area?
The primary risks include potential overpayment due to lack of competitive pricing, suboptimal service delivery if the contractor lacks expertise in managing subscriptions, and potential delays or disruptions in access to critical information. There's also a risk that the contractor may not have established relationships with publishers, leading to administrative inefficiencies. Furthermore, if the contractor is merely a reseller without adding significant value, the VA could have likely obtained better terms and pricing through direct negotiation or a more specialized procurement vehicle. The unusual NAICS code suggests a potential mismatch between the contractor's capabilities and the service required.
How does this contract fit into the VA's broader strategy for accessing medical research and information resources?
This contract represents a small component of the VA's overall strategy for accessing medical research. The VA likely subscribes to numerous journals, databases, and research platforms to support its vast network of healthcare providers and researchers. The specific inclusion of the AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY JOURNAL suggests a targeted need for information relevant to pulmonary and critical care medicine. However, the procurement method (sole-source) raises questions about whether this specific acquisition aligns with best practices for cost-effectiveness and strategic sourcing within the VA's larger information resource management framework.
What is the historical spending pattern for journal subscriptions within the VA, and does this award deviate significantly?
The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for journal subscriptions within the VA. To assess deviation, one would need to analyze past VA procurements for similar services, looking at contract values, durations, competition levels, and awarded vendors. A pattern of competitive awards for subscriptions would make this sole-source award stand out as an anomaly. Conversely, if the VA has a history of sole-source awards for specific journals or types of information, this might be less unusual, though still subject to scrutiny regarding justification and value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Web Search Portals, Libraries, Archives, and Other Information Services › Web Search Portals and All Other Information Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5300 ATLANTIC AVE STE 106L, RALEIGH, NC, 27609
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $113,314
Exercised Options: $113,314
Current Obligation: $48,206
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-04-18
Current End Date: 2027-04-17
Potential End Date: 2027-04-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-01
Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts
- CCN Region 3 Express Report — $5.2B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Express Report for FY22 Region 2 — $5.1B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Fiscal Year 2022 Express Report for Region 1 — $4.2B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Express Report for the Patient Centered Community Care (PC3) Contract — $3.3B (Triwest Healthcare Alliance Corp)
- CCN Region Three FY21 Express Report — $3.1B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)