VA awards 6-month extension for autotransfusion services to Perfusion.com, Inc. for $211,520

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,152 ($21.2K)

Contractor: Perfusion.com, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-05-01

End Date: 2026-10-31

Contract Duration: 183 days

Daily Burn Rate: $116/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: EXTEND 6 MONTHS - AUTOTRANSFUSION AND EQUIPMENT LEASING SERVICES.

Place of Performance

Location: RENO, WASHOE County, NEVADA, 89502

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $21,152 to PERFUSION.COM, INC. for work described as: EXTEND 6 MONTHS - AUTOTRANSFUSION AND EQUIPMENT LEASING SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract extension indicates continued reliance on Perfusion.com, Inc. for critical medical services. 2. Limited competition raises questions about potential price efficiencies and market responsiveness. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the VA. 4. Performance duration of 183 days suggests a short-term need or a bridge to a new contract. 5. The contract's value is modest, suggesting it may be a specialized or niche service. 6. Geographic focus on Nevada implies a specific regional requirement for these services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The awarded amount of $211,520 for a 6-month period for autotransfusion and equipment leasing services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the equipment and services. Without direct comparable contracts for similar services in the same region, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price contract type offers predictability for the Department of Veterans Affairs. The extension suggests satisfaction with the current provider's performance and pricing, but also limits opportunities to explore potentially more cost-effective solutions through competition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating it was likely awarded on a sole-source basis or through a limited competition not publicly advertised. The absence of a competitive process means that the VA did not solicit bids from multiple vendors. This approach can be justified for specialized services where only one vendor can meet the requirement, but it bypasses the price discovery benefits that open competition provides. The lack of transparency in the procurement process makes it difficult to ascertain if the best possible price was achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not be receiving the most competitive pricing due to the lack of open competition. Without a bidding process, there is less pressure on the contractor to offer the lowest possible price.

Public Impact

Veterans in Nevada requiring autotransfusion services will continue to receive them. The contract supports the provision of specialized medical equipment and related services within VA facilities. The extension ensures continuity of care for patients undergoing procedures that necessitate autotransfusion. Healthcare professionals at the VA facility will have access to necessary equipment and support. The contract indirectly supports jobs within the specialized medical equipment and services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Sole-source awards can limit innovation and vendor diversity.
The short extension period might indicate an interim solution rather than a long-term strategy.

Positive Signals

Extension ensures continuity of critical medical services for veterans.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Perfusion.com, Inc. has likely demonstrated satisfactory performance to warrant an extension.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare services sector, particularly within the federal government, involves significant spending on medical equipment, supplies, and specialized services. Contracts for autotransfusion and related equipment leasing fall under this broad category. The market for such specialized medical technology can be concentrated, with a few key players dominating. Benchmarking this contract's value is difficult without specific market data on autotransfusion equipment leasing rates, but it represents a small component of the VA's overall healthcare procurement budget.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded to Perfusion.com, Inc. and there is no indication of a small business set-aside. Furthermore, the data does not specify any subcontracting requirements. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this particular award. However, the lack of competition could mean that smaller, specialized firms were not given an opportunity to bid.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Veterans Affairs has established oversight mechanisms for its contracts. As this is a delivery order under a larger contract (implied by the 'aw' field), oversight would typically involve contract officers, program managers, and potentially the VA Office of Inspector General if performance issues or fraud were suspected. Transparency is limited due to the non-competed nature of the award, making public assessment of accountability more challenging. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract simplifies some aspects of financial oversight.

Related Government Programs

Medical Equipment Leasing
Autotransfusion Services
Veterans Health Administration Contracts
Temporary Medical Staffing

Risk Flags

Limited Competition
Sole-Source Award Justification Needed
Potential for Price Inflation
Lack of Market Research Evidence

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $21,152 to PERFUSION.COM, INC.. EXTEND 6 MONTHS - AUTOTRANSFUSION AND EQUIPMENT LEASING SERVICES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PERFUSION.COM, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21,152.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-05-01. End: 2026-10-31.

What is the track record of Perfusion.com, Inc. with the federal government, specifically the VA?

Information regarding Perfusion.com, Inc.'s specific track record with the federal government, particularly the Department of Veterans Affairs, is not detailed in the provided data. However, the fact that the VA has extended a contract to them for autotransfusion and equipment leasing services suggests a prior working relationship and likely satisfactory performance on their part. To fully assess their track record, a review of past performance evaluations, other awarded contracts, and any documented issues or commendations would be necessary. Without this additional context, it's presumed their performance has met the VA's requirements to justify this extension.

How does the cost of this contract compare to similar autotransfusion services procured by other federal agencies or the private sector?

A direct cost comparison for this contract is challenging without access to a broader market analysis of autotransfusion and equipment leasing services. The provided data indicates a firm-fixed price of $211,520 for a 6-month period. The 'cpu' field is marked as N/A, suggesting a lack of readily available per-unit cost benchmarks. To perform a robust comparison, one would need to identify similar contracts awarded by other agencies (e.g., DoD, HHS) or analyze pricing from private healthcare providers for comparable services and equipment. Factors such as equipment specifications, service level agreements, geographic location, and contract duration significantly influence pricing, making direct apples-to-apples comparisons difficult.

What are the primary risks associated with extending a contract on a sole-source or limited-competition basis for specialized medical services?

The primary risks associated with extending contracts on a sole-source or limited-competition basis for specialized medical services include potential overpayment due to a lack of competitive pressure, reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve efficiency, and a missed opportunity to engage with a wider range of vendors who might offer superior technology or better pricing. For taxpayers, this can translate to higher costs. For the agency, it may mean not accessing the most advanced or cost-effective solutions available in the market. Furthermore, it can create a perception of favoritism or a lack of due diligence in procurement, potentially impacting public trust.

What is the expected effectiveness and impact of these autotransfusion services on patient care within the VA system?

Autotransfusion services are critical in surgical procedures to recover and reinfuse a patient's own blood, thereby reducing the need for allogeneic (donor) blood transfusions. This can lead to improved patient outcomes by minimizing risks associated with donor blood, such as transfusion reactions or disease transmission. For the VA system, ensuring access to reliable autotransfusion equipment and services directly supports surgical departments, potentially leading to safer and more efficient patient care, especially for veterans undergoing complex surgeries. The effectiveness is measured by the availability of the service when needed and the successful application of the technology to reduce donor blood reliance.

How has federal spending on temporary help services (NAICS 561320) trended over the past five years, and how does this contract fit into that trend?

The provided data classifies this contract under NAICS code 561320, 'Temporary Help Services.' Federal spending in this category typically encompasses a wide range of services, including providing supplemental staffing for various functions. Without specific historical spending data for this NAICS code across the federal government, it's difficult to provide a precise trend analysis. However, overall federal spending on services has generally increased over the past five years, driven by various agency needs. This particular contract, valued at $211,520 for a 6-month extension, represents a very small fraction of the total federal expenditure within this broad category. Its focus on specialized medical equipment leasing and services makes it a niche application within the broader 'temporary help' classification.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Employment Services › Temporary Help Services

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND SURGICAL SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 17080 SAFETY ST STE 109, FORT MYERS, FL, 33908

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,152

Exercised Options: $21,152

Current Obligation: $21,152

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C26121D0080

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline