VA awards $21.2M contract for residential mental health and substance abuse facilities in California

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,210 ($21.2K)

Contractor: Yolo Wayfarer Center (christian Mission)

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: OP2 YOLO COUNTY HCHV

Place of Performance

Location: WINTERS, YOLO County, CALIFORNIA, 95694

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $21,210.24 to YOLO WAYFARER CENTER (CHRISTIAN MISSION) for work described as: OP2 YOLO COUNTY HCHV Key points: 1. Contract aims to provide essential residential services for veterans. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks. 4. Performance period spans one year, allowing for focused service delivery. 5. Geographic focus on California addresses regional veteran needs. 6. Contract aligns with VA's mission to support veteran well-being.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $21.2 million for a 364-day period for residential mental health and substance abuse facilities appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for veteran care facilities in California would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost increases, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating it was likely a full and open competition for procurements below a certain threshold. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but SAP generally encourages broad participation. The level of competition, while not explicitly detailed, is expected to drive competitive pricing and ensure a fair market value for the services provided.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process under SAP helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by selecting the most cost-effective and capable provider for these critical veteran services.

Public Impact

Veterans in California requiring residential mental health and substance abuse treatment will benefit from these services. The contract supports the delivery of critical care, including housing, therapy, and support services. Services are geographically focused within California, addressing a specific regional need. The contract may indirectly support local employment in the healthcare and support services sectors within California.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service disruptions if the selected provider faces operational challenges.
Ensuring consistent quality of care across all residents throughout the contract period.
Monitoring contractor performance to ensure adherence to therapeutic standards and veteran well-being.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to an entity with a stated mission aligned with veteran support (YOLO WAYFARER CENTER).
Firm fixed-price contract limits financial risk for the government.
Clear performance period allows for focused evaluation of services rendered.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare services sector, specifically focusing on residential mental health and substance abuse treatment facilities, is a critical area of government spending. This contract falls within the broader category of healthcare services for vulnerable populations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other VA contracts for similar facilities in different regions or contracts with other federal agencies providing similar support services.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus is on large business or other eligible entities. There are no explicit subcontracting requirements mentioned in the data, but the prime contractor will be responsible for delivering the services. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor actively engages small businesses for support services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures will be tied to the performance standards outlined in the contract. Transparency is facilitated through contract award data, but detailed operational oversight specifics are not publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

VA Mental Health Services
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Grants
TRICARE Mental Health Benefits
Community Care Network (CCN) Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for service quality variations
Reliance on contractor performance for critical veteran care
Geographic concentration of services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $21,210.24 to YOLO WAYFARER CENTER (CHRISTIAN MISSION). OP2 YOLO COUNTY HCHV

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YOLO WAYFARER CENTER (CHRISTIAN MISSION).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21,210.24.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of YOLO WAYFARER CENTER (CHRISTIAN MISSION) in providing similar residential mental health and substance abuse services?

Information regarding the specific track record of YOLO WAYFARER CENTER (CHRISTIAN MISSION) in delivering residential mental health and substance abuse services under federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, any prior government contracts held by this organization, and their history of successful service delivery. Without this specific data, it is difficult to definitively assess their experience and capability. However, their inclusion in the award suggests they met the requirements for this specific solicitation. Further investigation into their organizational history and any publicly available performance metrics would be necessary for a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar residential treatment facilities in California?

The provided data does not include specific pricing details beyond the total contract value of $21.2 million for a 364-day period. To compare this to market rates, one would need to analyze the cost per resident per day or per month, factoring in the level of care provided (e.g., intensity of therapy, staffing ratios, amenities). Benchmarking against similar facilities in California, both government-funded and private, would be essential. Factors such as geographic location within California (urban vs. rural), the specific diagnoses treated, and the scope of services offered significantly influence market rates. Without a detailed cost breakdown and comparable facility data, a precise market rate comparison is not feasible based solely on the provided information.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this type of contract for residential mental health services?

Primary risk indicators for this contract include potential challenges in maintaining consistent service quality and therapeutic effectiveness, ensuring resident safety and well-being, and managing staff turnover within the facility. There's also a risk of contractor performance issues, such as failure to meet program goals or adhere to regulatory standards. Financial risks for the government are generally mitigated by the firm fixed-price contract type, but scope creep or unforeseen service demands could still pose challenges. Furthermore, ensuring adequate capacity and timely access to care for all eligible veterans represents an operational risk. The geographic concentration in California might also present localized risks related to resource availability or specific community needs.

How effective is the VA in ensuring the quality of care provided by contracted residential facilities?

The VA employs several mechanisms to ensure the quality of care provided by contracted residential facilities. These typically include detailed performance work statements (PWS) outlining specific service requirements and quality standards, regular site visits and inspections by VA contract officers and program managers, and performance monitoring through data collection and reporting. Contract performance is evaluated, and feedback from veteran participants may also be incorporated. The VA also relies on accreditation standards from bodies like The Joint Commission for certain types of facilities. However, the effectiveness can vary depending on the rigor of oversight, the clarity of performance metrics, and the VA's capacity to actively manage and enforce contract terms.

What are the historical spending patterns for residential mental health and substance abuse facilities by the Department of Veterans Affairs?

Historical spending patterns for residential mental health and substance abuse facilities by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have generally shown a consistent and increasing need for these services. The VA has progressively expanded its network of contracted community-based services to supplement its internal capacity. Spending in this area is influenced by factors such as the number of veterans seeking care, the complexity of their needs (including co-occurring disorders), and policy initiatives aimed at improving access and outcomes. While specific aggregate spending figures for this exact contract category over multiple years are not provided, it is understood that the VA allocates significant resources annually to community care providers, including those offering residential treatment for mental health and substance use disorders, reflecting a sustained commitment to addressing these critical veteran health issues.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities › Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 285 4TH ST, WOODLAND, CA, 95695

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Domestic Shelter, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $21,210

Exercised Options: $21,210

Current Obligation: $21,210

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C26125D0037

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline