VA awards $3.3M contract for elevator inspection services to Endevelopment L.L.C

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,308 ($3.3K)

Contractor: Endevelopment L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-05-01

End Date: 2027-04-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ELEVATOR INSPECTION (WITNESSING) SERVICES - BASE YEAR

Place of Performance

Location: SAGINAW, SAGINAW County, MICHIGAN, 48602

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $3,308 to ENDEVELOPMENT L.L.C. for work described as: ELEVATOR INSPECTION (WITNESSING) SERVICES - BASE YEAR Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential building safety services, ensuring compliance with safety standards. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially competitive bidding process under SAP. 3. Performance context relies on the contractor's ability to conduct thorough and accurate inspections. 4. Sector positioning within building inspection services is critical for facility maintenance. 5. Risk indicators include potential for inspection errors or delays impacting facility operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.3 million for one year of elevator inspection services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facility maintenance and inspection services would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government, assuming the scope of work is well-defined.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a limited competition environment. While the specific number of bidders is not detailed, SAP is typically used for procurements under the micro-purchase threshold or for those where only a limited number of sources are capable of providing the required services. This approach can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing compared to full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition under SAP may result in slightly higher prices for taxpayers compared to a broader, more competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Veterans Affairs facilities benefit from ensured elevator safety and operational reliability. Services delivered include witnessing elevator inspections to verify compliance with safety codes. Geographic impact is focused on VA facilities within Michigan. Workforce implications include the need for qualified inspectors and potential support staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition to impact cost-effectiveness.
Reliance on contractor's expertise for accurate and thorough inspections.
Need for clear performance standards and monitoring to ensure quality.

Positive Signals

Contract addresses a critical safety and operational need for VA facilities.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Focus on specialized inspection services ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.

Sector Analysis

The building inspection services sector is vital for ensuring the safety and compliance of infrastructure. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. Spending in this area is driven by the need for regulatory adherence, facility maintenance, and risk mitigation across government and private sectors. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within facility management and engineering support categories.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not provided in the data. Analysis of the contractor's size and any subcontracting requirements would be necessary to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract would likely be managed by the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officers and facility managers. Accountability measures would include performance reviews, adherence to the contract's statement of work, and compliance with inspection standards. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific inspection reports may be internal.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Facility Safety and Compliance Services
Government Elevator Maintenance
Professional Engineering and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition
Contractor performance history unknown
Potential for scope creep if not well-defined

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $3,308 to ENDEVELOPMENT L.L.C.. ELEVATOR INSPECTION (WITNESSING) SERVICES - BASE YEAR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENDEVELOPMENT L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,308.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-05-01. End: 2027-04-30.

What is the track record of Endevelopment L.L.C. in providing similar inspection services to federal agencies?

A review of Endevelopment L.L.C.'s past performance with federal agencies would be crucial to assess their reliability and expertise in delivering elevator inspection services. This would involve examining previous contracts, client feedback, and any documented performance issues or successes. Understanding their history with similar scopes of work, particularly for government clients, can provide insights into their capacity to meet the VA's requirements and potentially mitigate risks associated with contractor performance.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for elevator inspection services in Michigan?

To benchmark the value for money, the awarded price of $3.3 million for one year of service needs to be compared against prevailing market rates for similar elevator inspection services in Michigan. This comparison should consider the scope of services, frequency of inspections, types of elevators, and the qualifications of the inspection personnel. Obtaining quotes from other qualified inspection firms or consulting industry cost data would help determine if the VA secured a competitive price or if there is potential for cost savings.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential inaccuracies in inspections leading to safety hazards, delays in service impacting facility operations, and contractor underperformance. Mitigation strategies would involve clearly defined performance standards in the contract, regular performance monitoring by the VA, requiring qualified and certified inspectors, and having contingency plans for service disruptions. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract also mitigates cost overrun risks for the government, provided the scope is well-defined.

How effective are witnessing elevator inspections as a method for ensuring VA facility safety?

Witnessing elevator inspections is an effective control mechanism to ensure that third-party inspectors are performing their duties diligently and accurately, adhering to all relevant safety codes and standards. It adds a layer of oversight to the primary inspection process, reducing the risk of overlooked defects or non-compliance. The effectiveness is contingent on the qualifications of the witnessing personnel and the thoroughness of their review of the primary inspection findings.

What has been the historical spending pattern for elevator inspection services by the Department of Veterans Affairs?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for elevator inspection services by the VA would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and awarded contractors over time. This data can help identify if spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether the current award aligns with past investments. Understanding historical spending can also highlight potential opportunities for consolidating services, negotiating better rates through longer-term contracts, or identifying areas where spending may be disproportionately high.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Building Inspection Services

Product/Service Code: QUALITY CONTROL, TEST, INSPECTION › INSPECTION SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 36C25026Q0314

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 CORWIN CT STE 103, NEWBURGH, NY, 12550

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,384

Exercised Options: $3,308

Current Obligation: $3,308

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline