VA awards $24.5M for X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT, with hardware manufacturing focus

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,544 ($24.5K)

Contractor: International Television Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-05-10

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 82 days

Daily Burn Rate: $299/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT

Place of Performance

Location: LONG BEACH, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90810

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $24,543.87 to INTERNATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION for work described as: X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in diagnostic imaging technology. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding environment for this equipment. 3. Performance period is relatively short, indicating a need for timely delivery and setup. 4. The contract falls within the hardware manufacturing sector, supporting a critical industry. 5. Geographic focus on California may indicate specific facility needs or regional deployment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $24.5 million for X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT appears reasonable given the nature of specialized medical hardware. Benchmarking against similar procurements for advanced diagnostic equipment would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure offers cost certainty to the government, but the specific unit costs and overall pricing strategy require further analysis to confirm optimal value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions. The open competition suggests the agency sought the best value from the market.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and increases the likelihood of obtaining high-quality equipment at a fair cost.

Public Impact

Veterans will benefit from improved diagnostic capabilities through advanced X-ray equipment. The contract supports the delivery of essential healthcare services within the Department of Veterans Affairs. Deployment is anticipated in California, impacting VA facilities in that state. The contract may indirectly support jobs in the hardware manufacturing and medical technology sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for obsolescence of technology within the equipment's lifecycle.
Ensuring adequate training and maintenance support for the new equipment.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Clear performance period with defined delivery and end dates.

Sector Analysis

The procurement of X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT falls within the broader healthcare technology and medical device manufacturing sector. This sector is characterized by rapid innovation, stringent regulatory requirements, and significant government spending due to the critical nature of healthcare services. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale procurements for diagnostic imaging systems by federal agencies like the VA, DoD, and HHS.

Small Business Impact

While the contract details do not explicitly mention small business set-asides or subcontracting goals, the full and open competition nature allows small businesses to compete if they meet the qualifications. The primary contractor, INTERNATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION, is not typically categorized as a small business. Further investigation into subcontracting opportunities would be necessary to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified equipment by the deadline. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG, where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Medical Equipment Procurement
Diagnostic Imaging Systems
Veterans Health Administration Services
Hardware Manufacturing Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for technological obsolescence
Dependence on specific maintenance and support contracts
Integration challenges with existing healthcare IT systems

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $24,543.87 to INTERNATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION. X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTERNATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24,543.87.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-05-10. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the track record of INTERNATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION in supplying medical equipment to the federal government?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to ascertain INTERNATIONAL TELEVISION CORPORATION's historical performance in supplying medical equipment, specifically X-ray or diagnostic imaging systems. This would involve examining past contract awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or disputes. Understanding their experience with similar government contracts, particularly with the Department of Veterans Affairs, is crucial for assessing their capability and reliability in fulfilling this $24.5 million award.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar X-ray test equipment?

To assess value for money, the awarded price of $24.5 million needs to be benchmarked against current market rates for comparable X-ray test equipment. This involves researching prices from other manufacturers and distributors, considering factors like equipment specifications, features, warranty, and support services. Comparing the price per unit or per system, adjusted for any differences in configuration or quantity, against industry benchmarks and recent government procurements for similar items will indicate whether the VA secured a competitive price.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and acceptance criteria for this contract?

The contract likely specifies key performance indicators (KPIs) and acceptance criteria related to the technical specifications, functionality, and performance of the X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT. These would include requirements for image quality, radiation output, system reliability, and compliance with relevant medical and safety standards. The acceptance criteria would define the conditions under which the VA will formally accept the delivered equipment, ensuring it meets all contractual obligations before final payment.

What is the anticipated impact of this equipment on diagnostic wait times and patient throughput at VA facilities?

The introduction of new X-RAY TEST EQUIPMENT is expected to enhance diagnostic capabilities, potentially leading to reduced wait times for X-ray procedures and improved patient throughput. By providing more efficient and potentially higher-resolution imaging, the equipment could enable faster diagnoses and treatment planning. The specific impact will depend on the volume of procedures at the targeted California facilities and how effectively the new systems are integrated into existing clinical workflows.

Are there any known risks associated with the specific model or type of X-ray test equipment being procured?

Assessing risks associated with the specific X-ray test equipment requires knowledge of the chosen models and manufacturers. Potential risks could include technological obsolescence, reliability issues, maintenance challenges, or compatibility problems with existing IT infrastructure. A thorough risk assessment would involve reviewing manufacturer data, independent testing reports, and feedback from other healthcare providers using similar equipment to identify any potential drawbacks or failure points.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Hardware Manufacturing › Hardware Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL/DENTAL/VETERINARY EQPT/SUPP

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 21000 S WILMINGTON AVE, LONG BEACH, CA, 90810

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Labor Surplus Area Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,544

Exercised Options: $24,544

Current Obligation: $24,544

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS21F169AA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline