VA awards $148M contract for halfway housing services to C&C Enterprize Decatur, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $148,260 ($148.3K)

Contractor: C&C Enterprize Decatur, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2022-08-28

End Date: 2025-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,190 days

Daily Burn Rate: $125/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: HALF WAY HOUSING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: DECATUR, DEKALB County, GEORGIA, 30032

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $148,260.34 to C&C ENTERPRIZE DECATUR, LLC for work described as: HALF WAY HOUSING SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about potential cost efficiencies. 2. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term need for these critical services. 3. Geographic focus on Georgia indicates a localized approach to addressing housing needs. 4. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 5. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller entities.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $148.3 million over approximately three years (1190 days) for residential mental health and substance abuse facilities appears substantial. Without direct comparable contract data for similar services in Georgia, it is difficult to definitively benchmark the value. However, the sole-source nature of the award warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and that the government is receiving good value for money compared to what might be achieved through a competitive process. The absence of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes a detailed assessment of effectiveness challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when only one vendor is capable of providing the required services, or in specific emergency situations. The lack of competition means there was no direct price comparison or incentive for multiple bidders to offer their best pricing, which could potentially lead to higher costs for the government than if the contract had been competed.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit the government's ability to leverage competition to drive down prices, potentially resulting in less favorable pricing for taxpayers compared to a fully competed contract.

Public Impact

Veterans in Georgia requiring residential mental health and substance abuse treatment will benefit from these services. The contract ensures the provision of essential housing and support services for vulnerable populations. The geographic impact is concentrated within Georgia, addressing specific regional needs. The contract supports the workforce involved in providing these specialized care services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits price discovery and potential cost savings.
Lack of competition may reduce incentive for innovation or service improvement.
No explicit mention of performance metrics makes outcome assessment difficult.

Positive Signals

Addresses critical need for mental health and substance abuse treatment for veterans.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Long contract duration indicates commitment to sustained support.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare sector, specifically residential mental health and substance abuse facilities, is a critical area of government spending. This contract falls under the broader category of healthcare services, which often involves specialized providers and long-term care. Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without more specific data on per-patient costs or comparable facility rates in Georgia. However, the significant award amount suggests a substantial operational scale and scope of services provided.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor is there an indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in delivering these services were not explicitly prioritized through this specific award mechanism. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral to potentially negative if these services could have been effectively provided by qualified small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) program managers responsible for mental health and housing services. Accountability measures would be defined within the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature of the award; however, contract award data is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

VA Mental Health Services
Substance Abuse Treatment Programs
Residential Healthcare Facilities
Veteran Support Services

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of competition
Potential for cost overruns
Limited transparency on performance metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $148,260.34 to C&C ENTERPRIZE DECATUR, LLC. HALF WAY HOUSING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is C&C ENTERPRIZE DECATUR, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $148,260.34.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-08-28. End: 2025-11-30.

What is the historical spending pattern for halfway housing services by the Department of Veterans Affairs?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for halfway housing services by the VA is crucial for understanding trends, identifying potential cost efficiencies, and assessing the overall investment in veteran support. Without access to specific historical VA spending data for this particular service category, a precise analysis is not possible. However, generally, federal spending on healthcare and support services for veterans, including mental health and substance abuse treatment, has seen consistent increases over the years, driven by growing demand and expanded eligibility. The VA's budget is substantial, with significant allocations directed towards medical care and benefits. To provide a detailed historical context for this $148 million contract, one would need to examine multi-year spending reports from the VA, focusing on contracts for residential treatment facilities, halfway houses, and related support services, looking for patterns in award values, contract durations, and the number of awarded contracts within this domain.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar services provided by other federal agencies or in the private sector?

Benchmarking the pricing of this $148 million contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and the specific context of veteran residential mental health and substance abuse services in Georgia. A direct comparison to similar contracts across other federal agencies or the private sector would require access to detailed pricing structures, service levels, and geographic cost variations. Typically, competitive bidding processes allow for price discovery and negotiation, leading to potentially more favorable rates. Given this is a sole-source award, it's imperative to assess if the pricing reflects fair market value, possibly through internal VA cost analysis or by referencing industry reports on the cost of providing such specialized residential care. Without specific comparable data points (e.g., cost per bed per day, cost per patient per month), a definitive value-for-money assessment relative to market rates is difficult.

What are the specific performance metrics and expected outcomes for this halfway housing contract?

The provided data does not include specific performance metrics or expected outcomes for this halfway housing services contract. Typically, such contracts would outline key performance indicators (KPIs) related to patient recovery rates, length of stay, successful transition to independent living, recidivism rates, and client satisfaction. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) would be responsible for monitoring the contractor's performance against these metrics. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and impact of the services being provided. A thorough review of the full contract document would be necessary to identify the specific performance standards and how the contractor's adherence to them is measured and enforced.

What is the track record of C&C Enterprize Decatur, LLC in providing similar services to the government?

Information regarding the specific track record of C&C Enterprize Decatur, LLC in providing similar halfway housing or residential mental health and substance abuse services to the government is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their capabilities and past performance, one would typically look at their contract history with federal agencies, including the value and duration of previous contracts, client feedback, and any performance evaluations or awards received. A sole-source award, especially one of this magnitude, often implies that the contracting agency has prior positive experience with the vendor or has determined them to be uniquely qualified. Further investigation into C&C Enterprize Decatur, LLC's federal contracting database records and performance reports would be necessary for a comprehensive understanding of their track record.

What is the risk assessment associated with this sole-source contract award?

The primary risk associated with this sole-source contract award is the potential for inflated costs due to the lack of competition. Without multiple bids, there is less pressure on the contractor to offer the most competitive pricing, and the government may not achieve the best possible value for its expenditure. Another risk is the potential for complacency from the contractor, as there is no immediate threat of losing the contract to a competitor. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the services provided needs to be rigorously monitored to ensure that the intended outcomes for veterans are being met. The government must ensure robust oversight mechanisms are in place to mitigate these risks and verify that the services are delivered effectively and at a fair price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities › Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2283 AMBER WAY, DECATUR, GA, 30032

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $148,260

Exercised Options: $148,260

Current Obligation: $148,260

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline