VA awards $1.35M contract for boiler project engineering services to Miller-Remick, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,347,690 ($1.3M)

Contractor: Miller-Remick, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2029-05-25

Contract Duration: 1,150 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: 523A4-20-208 REPLACE BOILERS AND UPGRADE CONTROLS-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES FOR THE BOILER PROJECT.

Place of Performance

Location: WEST ROXBURY, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02132

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $1.3 million to MILLER-REMICK, LLC for work described as: 523A4-20-208 REPLACE BOILERS AND UPGRADE CONTROLS-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES FOR THE BOILER PROJECT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential infrastructure upgrade at a VA facility. 2. Engineering services are critical for ensuring successful construction and long-term operational efficiency. 3. The contract duration of over three years suggests a complex and lengthy project. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 5. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified bidders. 6. The specific NAICS code (541330) points to specialized engineering expertise required for this project.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $1.35 million for architectural and engineering services for a boiler replacement project appears reasonable given the multi-year duration and the complexity typically associated with such infrastructure upgrades. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise assessment, but the scope suggests a significant undertaking. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which implies that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 7 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this specialized engineering service. This competitive environment is generally favorable for achieving a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging high-quality service delivery.

Public Impact

Veterans will benefit from improved and reliable heating and hot water systems at the VA facility. The project ensures the continued operation and modernization of critical healthcare infrastructure. The services delivered include construction period support, ensuring the project stays on track. The geographic impact is localized to the specific VA facility in Massachusetts. The contract supports specialized engineering jobs within the professional services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in complex infrastructure projects, requiring diligent oversight.
Reliance on a single contractor for an extended period could pose risks if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a wide pool of potential providers.
Firm fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overruns.
The contractor, Miller-Remick, LLC, is likely experienced in similar engineering services.
The multi-year duration suggests a commitment to project completion and stability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader Construction and Professional Services industries. The market for specialized engineering services supporting federal infrastructure projects is substantial, driven by the government's ongoing need to maintain and upgrade its facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar A&E services on large-scale facility upgrades can vary widely based on project complexity, location, and specific technical requirements.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a small business set-aside. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities exist for small business participation in this project.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officers and project managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to meet defined deliverables within budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal procurement databases, though specific project progress reports may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building and Fire Safety Program
VA Capital Asset and Business Process Realignment
Public Buildings Service - GSA

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
Risk of project delays impacting facility operations.
Dependence on contractor performance over a multi-year period.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $1.3 million to MILLER-REMICK, LLC. 523A4-20-208 REPLACE BOILERS AND UPGRADE CONTROLS-PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES FOR THE BOILER PROJECT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MILLER-REMICK, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2029-05-25.

What is the track record of Miller-Remick, LLC with the Department of Veterans Affairs and similar federal agencies?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to fully assess Miller-Remick, LLC's track record. This would involve examining past performance on similar contracts, including any reported issues, awards for excellence, or contract modifications. Understanding their history with the VA specifically, and with other federal agencies for engineering services related to facility infrastructure, would provide crucial context for evaluating their capability and reliability on this $1.35 million boiler project. Without specific past performance data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their suitability beyond the fact that they were selected through a competitive process.

How does the $1.35 million contract value compare to similar engineering services for boiler replacement projects at federal facilities?

Benchmarking the $1.35 million contract value requires comparing it to similar architectural and engineering (A&E) services for boiler replacement projects at federal facilities of comparable size and complexity. Factors such as the age and condition of the existing infrastructure, the scope of the upgrade (e.g., full replacement vs. partial upgrade, control system integration), and the specific technical requirements will influence costs. The duration of the contract (over three years) suggests a significant scope, potentially including extensive construction phase support. A detailed analysis would involve reviewing data from similar VA or other federal agency projects to determine if this award represents a fair market price for the services rendered.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Primary risks for this contract include potential delays in the construction phase, unforeseen site conditions requiring design modifications, and contractor performance issues. Given the multi-year duration, scope creep is also a risk, where additional requirements may be added, potentially increasing costs if not managed carefully. Mitigation strategies likely include robust project management by the VA, clear contract terms and performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and the firm fixed-price structure which incentivizes the contractor to control costs. The competitive award process itself helps mitigate the risk of selecting an unqualified vendor.

How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money for this specific project?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective for ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and risks are understood. For this boiler replacement project, the FFP structure incentivizes Miller-Remick, LLC to manage costs efficiently and complete the engineering services within the agreed-upon price. This provides budget certainty for the VA. However, the effectiveness relies heavily on the accuracy of the initial scope definition. If unforeseen complexities arise that necessitate significant changes, the FFP contract could become less advantageous if change orders are extensive, potentially leading to higher overall costs than a cost-reimbursable contract might have, albeit with less initial budget certainty.

What is the historical spending trend for engineering services related to facility maintenance and upgrades at the Department of Veterans Affairs?

Analyzing historical spending trends for engineering services at the VA for facility maintenance and upgrades would reveal patterns in investment in infrastructure modernization. This includes understanding the typical contract values, durations, and the prevalence of different contract types (e.g., FFP, cost-plus). Such analysis could indicate whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether it aligns with the VA's stated capital improvement goals. It would also highlight which types of engineering services are most frequently procured and which facilities or regions receive the most attention, providing context for the current $1.35 million award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1040 KINGS HIGHWAY NORTH, CHERRY HILL, NJ, 08034

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,347,690

Exercised Options: $1,347,690

Current Obligation: $1,347,690

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C24126D0006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline