VA awards $13.1M EAM/CMMS solution to Thundercat Technology, LLC for 364 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,097,195 ($13.1M)

Contractor: Thundercat Technology, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2025-09-26

End Date: 2026-09-25

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: EAM/CMMS SOLUTION

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $13.1 million to THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC for work described as: EAM/CMMS SOLUTION Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.1M for a one-year period suggests a significant investment in asset and maintenance management capabilities. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability for the VA. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 points to a focus on specialized IT services. 5. The award to Thundercat Technology, LLC, a single entity, highlights the importance of specialized vendor capabilities. 6. The contract duration of 364 days is typical for a delivery order, allowing for flexibility and potential follow-on work.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $13.1 million for a 364-day period represents a substantial investment in an EAM/CMMS solution. Benchmarking this against similar IT service contracts for asset management, the per-diem cost appears to be within a reasonable range, though specific feature sets and service level agreements would be needed for a precise comparison. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies that while the initial solicitation may have had some restrictions, the final award was made after a broad competitive process. Nine bids were received, indicating a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. This suggests that the VA was able to solicit offers from a wide range of qualified vendors.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as multiple vendors vied to offer the best value. This competitive environment helps drive down prices and encourages innovation among contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Veterans Affairs facilities and maintenance staff, who will utilize the EAM/CMMS solution. The contract will deliver enhanced capabilities for managing assets, scheduling maintenance, and optimizing operational efficiency across VA facilities. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting the maintenance and management of various VA healthcare facilities and administrative buildings. The contract supports the IT services sector and potentially creates or sustains jobs for technical personnel involved in implementing and supporting the solution.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The EAM/CMMS market is a significant segment within the broader IT services sector, focusing on software and services that help organizations manage their physical assets and maintenance operations. This contract fits within the government's ongoing efforts to modernize IT infrastructure and improve operational efficiency. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar enterprise-level software solutions in the federal government can vary widely based on scope, but a $13.1 million award for a one-year term indicates a substantial, enterprise-wide deployment.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem may be limited unless Thundercat Technology, LLC voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small business participation is planned.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officers and program managers. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by linking payment to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, eam-cmms, department-of-veterans-affairs, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, information-technology, asset-management, maintenance-management, virginia, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $13.1 million to THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC. EAM/CMMS SOLUTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THUNDERCAT TECHNOLOGY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-26. End: 2026-09-25.

What is the track record of Thundercat Technology, LLC in delivering similar EAM/CMMS solutions to federal agencies?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that Thundercat Technology, LLC has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily within the IT services domain. While specific details on their past performance with EAM/CMMS solutions are not immediately available from the provided data, their award by the VA for such a system suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience. Further investigation into their contract history, past performance evaluations, and any relevant certifications would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities in this specific area. It is common for IT service providers to have a broad range of capabilities, and this award signifies their success in a competitive bid for this particular requirement.

How does the $13.1 million contract value compare to other federal EAM/CMMS procurements?

The $13.1 million contract value for a 364-day period for an EAM/CMMS solution is a significant but not unprecedented amount for federal procurements of this nature. Enterprise-level IT solutions, especially those involving comprehensive asset and maintenance management for large agencies like the VA, often command substantial investments. Comparable contracts can range from a few million dollars for smaller deployments or specific modules to tens or even hundreds of millions for agency-wide, multi-year implementations. The value here suggests a robust solution likely covering a significant portion of the VA's operational needs for asset management, potentially including facilities, equipment, and maintenance scheduling across multiple sites.

What are the primary risks associated with implementing a new EAM/CMMS solution for the VA?

Key risks associated with implementing a new EAM/CMMS solution for the VA include potential data migration challenges from legacy systems, user adoption and training hurdles, integration issues with existing IT infrastructure, and the possibility of cost overruns if the scope is not well-defined or managed. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, making future transitions difficult or expensive. Ensuring the system meets the diverse needs of various VA facilities and personnel requires careful planning and execution. Cybersecurity risks are also paramount, given the sensitive nature of government operations and data.

How effective is a firm fixed-price contract in ensuring value for money in IT service procurements like this?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for the government in IT service procurements when the scope of work is well-defined and understood. Under an FFP contract, the contractor assumes most of the risk for cost overruns, which incentivizes them to manage their resources efficiently. This provides cost certainty for the buyer. However, if the scope is poorly defined or changes frequently, an FFP contract can lead to disputes or the contractor being unwilling to perform additional work without modification, potentially hindering project flexibility. For a defined solution like an EAM/CMMS, where requirements can be specified, FFP is a strong choice for cost control.

What is the historical spending trend for EAM/CMMS solutions by the Department of Veterans Affairs?

Historical spending data for EAM/CMMS solutions by the Department of Veterans Affairs would reveal trends in their investment in asset and maintenance management technologies. Without specific historical data for this contract category, it's difficult to provide precise figures. However, federal agencies, including the VA, have increasingly focused on modernizing their IT systems and improving operational efficiency. This often translates to increased spending on enterprise solutions like EAM/CMMS to better manage vast physical infrastructures and complex maintenance operations. Trends likely show a move towards more integrated, cloud-based, or advanced analytics-driven solutions over time.

What are the implications of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' for the VA and taxpayers?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' designation indicates that while there might have been an initial limited solicitation or a specific reason to exclude certain sources initially (e.g., specific technology compatibility, prior performance issues with some vendors), the final award was made through a broad competitive process. This approach aims to balance specific needs with maximizing competition. For the VA, it means they likely secured a solution that met specific, perhaps unique, requirements while still benefiting from multiple bids. For taxpayers, this method is generally favorable as it increases the likelihood of obtaining the best value by allowing a wider pool of qualified vendors to compete, driving down prices and fostering innovation compared to a sole-source award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Thundercat Technology LLC

Address: 11190 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 200, RESTON, VA, 20191

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,651,172

Exercised Options: $13,097,195

Current Obligation: $13,097,195

Actual Outlays: $13,097,195

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NNG15SD26B

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-26

Current End Date: 2026-09-25

Potential End Date: 2028-09-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-26

More Contracts from Thundercat Technology, LLC

View all Thundercat Technology, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts

View all Department of Veterans Affairs contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending