TEKSYNAP CORPORATION awarded $128M BPA Call for Computer Systems Design Services by NRC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $128,244,593 ($128.2M)

Contractor: Teksynap Corporation

Awarding Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Start Date: 2018-06-12

End Date: 2026-05-31

Contract Duration: 2,910 days

Daily Burn Rate: $44.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: GLINDA SNCC BPA CALL

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20852

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Nuclear Regulatory Commission obligated $128.2 million to TEKSYNAP CORPORATION for work described as: GLINDA SNCC BPA CALL Key points: 1. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of approximately 8 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 4. The services fall under Computer Systems Design, a common IT support category. 5. The award amount of over $128 million signifies a substantial investment in IT infrastructure. 6. The contract is managed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, highlighting its importance in a critical sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $128.2 million over nearly 8 years for computer systems design services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT service contracts for federal agencies suggests that pricing is likely competitive, especially considering it was awarded under full and open competition. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability, which is a positive indicator for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through a full and open competition process, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 4 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this significant IT services contract. This competitive environment is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation, leading to better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a market where multiple companies vie for the contract, potentially leading to lower costs and higher quality services.

Public Impact

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission benefits from enhanced computer systems design and support, crucial for its regulatory functions. Federal employees within the NRC will have access to updated and reliable IT systems. The contract supports the operational efficiency of a key federal agency responsible for nuclear safety and security. The IT infrastructure supported by this contract underpins the agency's ability to perform its mission-critical tasks.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
Reliance on a single BPA Call for extensive services might limit flexibility in adapting to rapidly changing IT needs.
Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed throughout the contract period.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty and reduces financial risk for the government.
The contract duration suggests a stable, long-term partnership for essential IT services.

Sector Analysis

Computer Systems Design Services (NAICS 541512) is a significant segment within the broader IT services industry. Federal spending in this area supports the modernization and maintenance of critical government IT infrastructure. The market is characterized by a mix of large prime contractors and specialized small businesses. This contract, valued at over $128 million, represents a substantial portion of spending within this category for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, aligning with the agency's need for robust IT support.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal for this particular award. However, the prime contractor, TEKSYNAP CORPORATION, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, which would need to be tracked separately.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which has established oversight mechanisms for its procurements. As a firm fixed-price contract awarded through full and open competition, it implies adherence to standard federal acquisition regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Further oversight would typically involve program management reviews and potentially Inspector General audits if specific concerns arise.

Related Government Programs

IT Professional Services
Information Technology Support Services
Computer Facilities Management Services
IT Consulting Services
Cloud Computing Services

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of technological obsolescence.
Potential for vendor lock-in if not managed proactively.
Reliance on a single BPA Call for extensive services requires careful management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Nuclear Regulatory Commission awarded $128.2 million to TEKSYNAP CORPORATION. GLINDA SNCC BPA CALL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEKSYNAP CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nuclear Regulatory Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $128.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-06-12. End: 2026-05-31.

What is TEKSYNAP CORPORATION's track record with federal contracts, particularly with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission?

TEKSYNAP CORPORATION has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily in IT services. While specific details on their performance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) are not fully detailed in this summary, the award of this significant BPA Call suggests a level of trust and capability recognized by the agency. Analyzing past performance reviews, contract modifications, and any past performance questionnaires associated with TEKSYNAP's prior NRC contracts would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and effectiveness in delivering similar services. Their overall federal contracting history, including awards from other agencies, can indicate their experience and capacity to handle large-scale IT projects.

How does the $128 million contract value compare to similar IT services contracts awarded by the NRC or other agencies?

The $128.2 million contract value for computer systems design services over approximately eight years is substantial, placing it among significant IT investments for federal agencies. To benchmark this value, one would compare it to other large indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicles or specific task orders for similar services (e.g., IT support, systems integration, cybersecurity) awarded by agencies of comparable size and mission complexity to the NRC. For instance, comparing it to IT service contracts at agencies like the Department of Energy or other regulatory bodies could provide context. The firm fixed-price nature and the competitive bidding process (4 bidders) suggest that this value is likely a result of market forces and represents a fair price for the defined scope and duration.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep, technological obsolescence over the nearly 8-year duration, and vendor performance issues. Scope creep can be mitigated through rigorous contract management, clearly defined deliverables, and change control processes. Technological obsolescence is managed by incorporating flexibility into the contract for upgrades and by the NRC maintaining oversight on technology roadmaps. Vendor performance risks are addressed through performance metrics, regular reviews, and the contract's fixed-price nature which incentivizes efficiency. The competitive award process also helps mitigate risks by selecting a capable vendor.

How effective is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission likely to be in overseeing this long-term IT services contract?

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's effectiveness in overseeing this long-term contract depends on several factors, including the expertise of its contracting officers and program managers, the clarity of performance metrics, and the robustness of its internal oversight processes. Given the agency's mission-critical nature and its experience with complex procurements, it is likely to have established procedures for managing such contracts. The firm fixed-price structure provides a degree of cost control. However, continuous monitoring of performance, regular communication with the contractor, and proactive identification of potential issues will be crucial for ensuring the contract remains effective and delivers the intended value throughout its duration.

What are the historical spending patterns for computer systems design services at the NRC?

Historical spending patterns for computer systems design services at the NRC would reveal the agency's consistent investment in IT infrastructure and support. Analyzing past contract awards for similar services, including the number of contracts, their values, and the duration, would indicate whether this $128 million BPA Call represents a significant increase, a continuation of existing spending levels, or a shift in strategy. Understanding these patterns helps assess the long-term commitment to IT modernization and support, and whether spending has been consistent or fluctuating. This context is vital for evaluating the current contract's place within the NRC's overall IT budget and strategic priorities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1900 ORACLE WAY, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $135,720,480

Exercised Options: $135,720,480

Current Obligation: $128,244,593

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 37

Total Subaward Amount: $27,029,141

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NRCHQ1017A0008

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline