Mold remediation task order for SSA's Addabbo Building awarded at $8,516.04

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,516 ($8.5K)

Contractor: Kcorp Reliance Company, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Social Security Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-07-06

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $95/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TASK ORDER AGAINST THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT AT THE ADDABBO BUILDING FOR PROFESSIONAL MOLD REMEDIATION IN ROOM 319 (3RD FLOOR).

Place of Performance

Location: JAMAICA, QUEENS County, NEW YORK, 11432

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Social Security Administration obligated $8,516.04 to KCORP RELIANCE COMPANY, INC. for work described as: TASK ORDER AGAINST THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT AT THE ADDABBO BUILDING FOR PROFESSIONAL MOLD REMEDIATION IN ROOM 319 (3RD FLOOR). Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the specialized nature of mold remediation. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the short duration and specific scope of work. 4. Performance context is a task order against an existing O&M contract. 5. Sector positioning is within facilities maintenance and specialized remediation services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $8,516.04 for a 90-day mold remediation task order is relatively small. Benchmarking against similar specialized remediation contracts is difficult without more granular data on the scope of work (e.g., square footage affected, type of mold). However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which is a positive sign for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies that while sources were initially excluded, the final award was made through a competitive process open to all eligible bidders. The specific details of the exclusion and subsequent open competition are not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests multiple bids were likely considered.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Public Impact

Benefits federal employees and visitors by ensuring a safe and healthy working environment within the Addabbo Building. Delivers professional mold remediation services in a specific area (Room 319, 3rd Floor). Geographic impact is localized to the SSA's New York office. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small, specialized remediation team.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the mold issue is more extensive than initially assessed.
Reliance on the existing O&M contract structure may obscure the true cost of specialized remediation.

Positive Signals

Task order is for a defined, short duration (90 days).
Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost uncertainty for the government.
Awarded under a competitive process, suggesting adherence to procurement regulations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the facilities maintenance and specialized building services sector. The market for professional mold remediation is niche, often serviced by specialized contractors who operate under broader building maintenance or construction contracts. Spending in this area is typically project-specific and driven by building condition assessments and regulatory compliance requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While KCORP RELIANCE COMPANY, INC. may be a small business, the procurement method suggests it competed on a level playing field with potentially larger firms. There is no explicit information on subcontracting requirements for small businesses within this specific task order.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would likely be managed by the Social Security Administration's facilities management and contracting officers responsible for the Addabbo Building. The Inspector General's office could investigate if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available, though detailed performance metrics are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Environmental Remediation Services
Operations and Maintenance Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for Undisclosed Scope Expansion
Limited Publicly Available Performance Data for Contractor

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Social Security Administration awarded $8,516.04 to KCORP RELIANCE COMPANY, INC.. TASK ORDER AGAINST THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT AT THE ADDABBO BUILDING FOR PROFESSIONAL MOLD REMEDIATION IN ROOM 319 (3RD FLOOR).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KCORP RELIANCE COMPANY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Social Security Administration (Social Security Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,516.04.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-07-06.

What is the track record of KCORP RELIANCE COMPANY, INC. with federal contracts, particularly in environmental remediation?

Information regarding KCORP RELIANCE COMPANY, INC.'s specific track record with federal contracts, especially in environmental remediation, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require searching federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for past performance ratings, contract history, and any reported issues or awards. Understanding their experience with similar scope, scale, and regulatory environments is crucial for assessing future performance risk on this task order.

How does the cost of this mold remediation task order compare to similar projects within the federal government or commercial sector?

Direct comparison of the $8,516.04 cost is challenging without detailed scope information (e.g., area affected, severity of mold, specific remediation techniques required). However, for a localized issue in a single room, this amount appears within a reasonable range for specialized environmental services. Benchmarking against industry cost guides for mold remediation, adjusted for labor rates in New York, would provide a more robust comparison. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests the contractor bears cost overrun risk, which is a positive indicator if the scope is well-defined.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific task order, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks include potential scope creep if the mold infestation is larger than initially assessed, and the possibility of unforeseen complications during remediation. Mitigation strategies include the firm-fixed-price contract, which shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor, and the short, defined duration (90 days), limiting the window for extended issues. Clear definition of the remediation area and required standards in the task order also helps manage risk. The existing O&M contract framework may provide established procedures for addressing unexpected findings.

How effective is the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' method in ensuring competitive pricing for specialized services like mold remediation?

This procurement method aims to balance the need for specialized services with competitive pricing. 'Full and open competition' ensures that multiple qualified vendors can bid, driving prices down through market forces. The 'after exclusion of sources' clause suggests an initial phase where certain vendors might have been deemed ineligible (perhaps due to specific certifications or past performance), followed by a broader competitive solicitation. This can be effective if the exclusion criteria are justified and the subsequent open competition attracts sufficient bids, leading to a fair market price.

What is the historical spending pattern for mold remediation or similar environmental services at the SSA's New York facilities?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for mold remediation or similar environmental services at the SSA's New York facilities. To assess this, one would need to analyze past contract awards for the Addabbo Building or other SSA properties in the region, looking for similar task orders or contracts. Understanding the frequency and cost of such services over time would help determine if this $8,516.04 award is an anomaly, a recurring need, or part of a larger trend in facility maintenance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 851 E WESTPOINT DR STE 102, WASILLA, AK, 99654

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,516

Exercised Options: $8,516

Current Obligation: $8,516

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 28321325D00060007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline