Social Security Administration awards $210K BPA for medical consultant services in California
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $210,160 ($210.2K)
Contractor: KIM P Morris Gettings
Awarding Agency: Social Security Administration
Start Date: 2026-07-01
End Date: 2027-06-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $577/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHWEST REGION (SAN FRANCISCO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.
Place of Performance
Location: SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO County, CALIFORNIA, 94119
Plain-Language Summary
Social Security Administration obligated $210,160 to KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHWEST REGION (SAN FRANCISCO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on independent case reviews for disability claims. 2. Services are essential for the agency's disability determination process. 3. The contract is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call order. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests predictable costs. 5. Contract duration is one year, with potential for renewal. 6. The awardee is KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS. 7. Services are geographically focused on the Southwest Region (San Francisco).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $210,160 for one year of medical consultant services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of disability claim reviews. Benchmarking against similar contracts for medical consultants in the public sector is challenging without more specific service details. However, the firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the agency. The value is tied to the volume and complexity of case files reviewed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was issued as a BPA Call Order, which is typically not competed under standard procurement procedures. While the specific details of the original BPA's competition are not provided, this call order itself was not competed. This limits the opportunity for price discovery and potentially reduces the competitive pressure that could drive down costs.
Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, a sole-source award means there was no opportunity to leverage competition to secure the best possible price for these essential services.
Public Impact
Individuals applying for Social Security disability benefits benefit from timely and accurate case reviews. The services directly support the Social Security Administration's mission to determine disability claims. The geographic impact is focused on the Southwest Region, specifically San Francisco. The contract supports specialized medical consultant roles, contributing to the healthcare services sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition for this specific call order limits price discovery.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical case reviews could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- The firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
- The contractor has been awarded a BPA, suggesting a prior vetting process.
- The services are crucial for the agency's core mission.
Sector Analysis
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 621112, Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists, falls within the Healthcare and Social Assistance sector. This sector is characterized by a high demand for specialized professional services. The contract for medical consultant services for disability claims is a niche but vital component within this sector, supporting administrative functions that rely on medical expertise.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not indicate any small business set-aside provisions (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from this specific award. The focus appears to be on securing specialized medical expertise rather than promoting small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
As a BPA Call Order, oversight is likely managed through the terms of the parent BPA and the specific call order agreement. The Social Security Administration has internal oversight mechanisms for its programs. Transparency is facilitated by contract databases, but detailed performance metrics and specific oversight activities for this call order are not publicly detailed.
Related Government Programs
- Social Security Administration Disability Determination Services
- Medical Expert Services Contracts
- Federal Disability Insurance Program
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition.
- Performance risk for critical case reviews.
- Limited public information on contractor track record.
Tags
healthcare, social-security-administration, medical-consulting, disability-claims, california, blanket-purchase-agreement, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, physicians, mental-health-specialists
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Social Security Administration awarded $210,160 to KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHWEST REGION (SAN FRANCISCO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Social Security Administration (Social Security Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $210,160.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-07-01. End: 2027-06-30.
What is the track record of KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS in providing medical consultant services to federal agencies?
Information regarding the specific track record of KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS in providing medical consultant services to federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. As this is a BPA Call Order, it implies that the contractor may have been vetted under the parent Blanket Purchase Agreement. Further investigation into the history of the parent BPA and any performance reviews associated with KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS would be necessary to fully assess their track record. Without access to past performance evaluations or a broader contract history, it is difficult to provide a comprehensive assessment of their reliability and quality of service.
How does the value of this contract compare to similar medical consultant services for disability claims?
Direct comparison of this $210,160 contract value to similar medical consultant services for disability claims is challenging without more granular data on the scope of work, number of cases reviewed, and the specific medical specialties involved. The provided data indicates a one-year duration for independent case reviews. Benchmarking would require access to a database of comparable federal contracts for medical consulting within the Social Security Administration or other agencies handling disability claims. Factors such as the complexity of cases, required turnaround times, and geographic location can significantly influence pricing. The firm fixed-price nature suggests cost predictability for the agency.
What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source contract?
The primary risk associated with this sole-source contract is the lack of competitive pressure, which could lead to suboptimal pricing or potentially less incentive for the contractor to maintain the highest levels of service quality and efficiency. If KIM P MORRIS GETTINGS experiences performance issues, the agency has limited immediate alternatives without initiating a new procurement process. Another risk is the potential for scope creep or unmanaged cost increases if the initial assumptions about the volume or complexity of case files are inaccurate, although the firm fixed-price structure aims to mitigate this. Ensuring robust contract management and performance monitoring is crucial.
How effective is the Social Security Administration's use of medical consultants for disability claims?
The effectiveness of the Social Security Administration's use of medical consultants for disability claims is a broad question that cannot be answered solely by the data for this single contract. Medical consultants play a critical role in providing objective medical opinions on disability claims, which are essential for fair and accurate decision-making. The agency's overall effectiveness is measured by various metrics, including processing times, accuracy rates, and claimant satisfaction. This specific contract supports that process by providing independent case reviews. The success of this particular contract would depend on the quality of reviews, adherence to timelines, and the impact on the overall efficiency and accuracy of the disability determination process.
What are the historical spending patterns for medical consultant services by the Social Security Administration?
Historical spending patterns for medical consultant services by the Social Security Administration are not detailed in the provided data for this specific contract. This award represents a single BPA Call Order valued at $210,160. To understand broader spending patterns, one would need to analyze historical contract data for the Social Security Administration, looking at the total expenditure on medical consulting services over several fiscal years, the number and types of contracts awarded, and the primary contractors. This would reveal trends in demand, pricing, and the agency's reliance on external medical expertise for its programs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Offices of Physicians › Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › OTHER MEDICAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1221 NEVIN AVE, RICHMOND, CA, 94802
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $210,160
Exercised Options: $210,160
Current Obligation: $210,160
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 28321321AC0940015
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-07-01
Current End Date: 2027-06-30
Potential End Date: 2027-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
Other Social Security Administration Contracts
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Contractor IS to Provide the Expertise, Technical Knowledge, IT Support Personnel, and Other Related Resources Necessary for Systems Analysis and Testing — $734.1M (Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation)
- Contractor to Provide Development&database Support to Agency's Office of Software Engineering — $593.5M (Leidos, Inc.)
- THE Government Intends to Establish a Single-Award Delivery Order Base Plus Four 1year Option Periods for the Renewal of IBM Software Maintenance and the Purchase of More Additional IBM Software Licenses Against the General Services Administrations Federal Supply Schedule Program. Previous Order SS00-15-30081 — $525.4M (International Business Machines Corporation)
- NEW 66 Month Open-Market Contract for Renewal of CA Software, Support Services, and Maintenance. CA Proprietary Software Products ARE Used Extensively Throughout OUR Mainframe and Distributed Environments AT ALL SSA Data Centers — $419.8M (CA, Inc.)