SSA's $8.3M Medical Consultant Services BPA with Rosanova Carole A MD Lacks Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,316 ($8.3K)

Contractor: Rosanova Carole a MD

Awarding Agency: Social Security Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 89 days

Daily Burn Rate: $93/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MID-WEST/WEST (CHICAGO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER F

Place of Performance

Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21235

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Social Security Administration obligated $8,316 to ROSANOVA CAROLE A MD for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MID-WEST/WEST (CHICAGO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER F Key points: 1. The Social Security Administration (SSA) awarded an $8.3 million Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for medical consultant services. 2. The contract is for reviewing disability claim case files, a critical function for the agency's disability program. 3. The award was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), raising questions about competition. 4. The primary contractor is Rosanova Carole A MD, with services primarily focused on the Midwest/West region. 5. The contract duration is 89 days, with an estimated end date of June 30, 2026.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The BPA call award amount is $8.3 million. Without a clear benchmark or comparison to similar contracts for medical consultant services, it is difficult to definitively assess if this pricing is excellent or fair. Further analysis of the scope of work and the number of reviews required would be necessary.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed under SAP, indicating a limited competition approach. This method may not yield the best possible pricing or selection of vendors, potentially impacting price discovery and overall value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of robust competition could lead to taxpayers potentially overpaying for these essential medical consultant services.

Public Impact

Impacts individuals applying for disability benefits who rely on timely and accurate case file reviews. Affects the efficiency and effectiveness of the SSA's disability determination process. Raises concerns about government spending practices and the use of limited competition awards.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Limited transparency in pricing
  • Potential for suboptimal vendor selection

Positive Signals

  • Essential service for disability program
  • Clear contract duration and scope

Sector Analysis

The healthcare sector, particularly services related to medical consulting and claims processing, is a significant area of government spending. Benchmarks for similar services often depend on the complexity of cases and the volume of reviews required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were considered or had the opportunity to compete for this BPA.

Oversight & Accountability

The limited competition approach warrants further oversight to ensure the SSA is obtaining fair pricing and high-quality services. Accountability for the justification of not competing this award more broadly is crucial.

Related Government Programs

  • Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists
  • Social Security Administration Contracting
  • Social Security Administration Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Limited justification for procurement method
  • Potential for inflated costs
  • Absence of small business participation noted

Tags

offices-of-physicians-mental-health-spec, social-security-administration, md, bpa-call, under-100k

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Social Security Administration awarded $8,316 to ROSANOVA CAROLE A MD. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MID-WEST/WEST (CHICAGO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER F

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROSANOVA CAROLE A MD.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Social Security Administration (Social Security Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,316.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the specific justification for not competing this BPA under SAP, and what steps were taken to ensure fair pricing?

The provided data states the contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP.' A comprehensive justification would typically detail why a competitive process was not feasible or advantageous, such as urgency, unique capabilities, or existing contract vehicles. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if fair pricing was achieved through alternative means or if taxpayers may have incurred additional costs due to the limited competition.

How does the per-case review cost compare to industry benchmarks for similar medical consultant services?

The provided data does not include a per-unit cost or the volume of case files to be reviewed, making a direct comparison to industry benchmarks impossible. To assess value, one would need to know the total number of reviews performed under the BPA and the total cost, then divide to find the average cost per review. This figure could then be compared to market rates for similar services.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a significant BPA without full and open competition?

The primary risks include potentially higher costs for taxpayers due to a lack of competitive pressure, suboptimal selection of vendors if the chosen contractor is not the best fit, and reduced transparency in the procurement process. This can also set a precedent for future procurements, potentially limiting opportunities for other qualified vendors and hindering innovation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social AssistanceOffices of PhysiciansOffices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICESOTHER MEDICAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 21627 ANDOVER RD, LAKE ZURICH, IL, 60047

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,316

Exercised Options: $8,316

Current Obligation: $8,316

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 28321321AC0540050

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-02

Current End Date: 2026-06-30

Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

Other Social Security Administration Contracts

View all Social Security Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending