Social Security Administration awards $197K BPA for medical consultant services in Southeast region

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,742 ($19.7K)

Contractor: Carmel Boykin-Wright

Awarding Agency: Social Security Administration

Start Date: 2026-07-01

End Date: 2027-06-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $54/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION (ATLANTA). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS CITY County, MISSOURI, 63108

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Social Security Administration obligated $19,742 to CARMEL BOYKIN-WRIGHT for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION (ATLANTA). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on independent case reviews for disability claims. 2. Services are essential for the agency's disability determination process. 3. The contract is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) with a call order. 4. It is a firm-fixed-price contract, providing cost certainty. 5. The duration is one year, with potential for renewal. 6. The contractor, Carmel Boykin-Wright, is responsible for delivering these services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $197,420 for one year of medical consultant services appears reasonable for specialized disability claim reviews. Benchmarking against similar contracts for independent medical reviews is challenging without more specific service details and geographic scope. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined scope of work, which can aid in cost control. The absence of competition, as noted in the contract details, may limit opportunities for achieving the best possible value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), and the specific competition details are not fully elaborated. As a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call order, the initial BPA may have been competed, but the specific call order's competition level is unclear. Without knowing how many entities were solicited or if it was a sole-source award for this specific call, it's difficult to assess the impact on price discovery. Further information on the BPA's establishment is needed.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of clear competition for this call order may mean taxpayers did not benefit from the potentially lower prices that could arise from a more competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Individuals applying for disability benefits will have their case files reviewed. The services directly support the Social Security Administration's mission to determine eligibility for disability programs. The geographic impact is focused on the Southeast region, specifically Atlanta. The contract supports a specialized professional workforce in the medical consulting field.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically medical consulting, which is a critical support function for government agencies dealing with health-related eligibility determinations. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 621111, 'Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists),' indicates a focus on medical expertise. Spending in this area is often driven by program demand and regulatory requirements, making consistent and reliable service providers essential.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). As this is a BPA call order, the original BPA competition may have included small business considerations, but this specific call does not appear to be directly targeted towards them. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Social Security Administration's program management and contracting offices. As a firm-fixed-price contract, performance monitoring and adherence to the statement of work are key oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, but specific details on internal review processes or Inspector General involvement for this particular BPA call are not provided.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

healthcare, social-security-administration, medical-consulting, southeast-region, blanket-purchase-agreement, call-order, firm-fixed-price, not-competed, professional-services, disability-claims

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Social Security Administration awarded $19,742 to CARMEL BOYKIN-WRIGHT. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION (ATLANTA). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CARMEL BOYKIN-WRIGHT.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Social Security Administration (Social Security Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19,742.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-07-01. End: 2027-06-30.

What is the track record of Carmel Boykin-Wright in providing similar medical consulting services to federal agencies?

Information regarding the specific track record of Carmel Boykin-Wright in providing medical consulting services, particularly to federal agencies, is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their suitability and past performance, a review of their contract history, client references, and any performance evaluations would be necessary. Understanding their experience with disability claim reviews and adherence to federal standards is crucial for evaluating the reliability of this contract. Without this information, it's difficult to gauge their established expertise and success rate in similar engagements.

How does the cost of these medical consultant services compare to similar contracts awarded by the SSA or other agencies?

Direct comparison of the cost for these medical consultant services is challenging without more granular data on the scope of work and the specific services rendered per case. The total contract value is $197,420 for a 364-day period. To benchmark effectively, we would need to know the number of case files to be reviewed, the complexity of each review, and the required turnaround time. If this BPA call order was competed, the pricing would reflect market rates. However, given the 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' status, a direct price-to-price comparison with competitively awarded contracts is difficult and may not yield a true value-for-money assessment.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential underperformance by the contractor, leading to delays in disability claim processing, and the risk of inadequate or biased medical reviews. Another risk is the potential for cost overruns if the scope of work is not clearly defined or managed, although the firm-fixed-price structure aims to mitigate this. Mitigation strategies would involve robust performance monitoring by the SSA, clear service level agreements within the BPA call order, and potentially periodic quality assurance reviews of the contractor's work. The lack of competition also presents a risk of not achieving the best possible value.

How effective is the current approach to procuring medical consultant services for disability claims?

The effectiveness of this specific procurement approach (BPA call order, not competed under SAP) is difficult to fully assess without more context on the overall strategy for acquiring medical consulting services. While BPAs can streamline the procurement of recurring needs, the lack of competition for this particular call order raises questions about efficiency and cost-effectiveness. The agency's ability to consistently secure high-quality, objective medical reviews at competitive prices is paramount to the effectiveness of its disability determination process. Evaluating this requires looking at the timeliness and accuracy of decisions influenced by these reviews.

What has been the historical spending pattern for medical consultant services by the Social Security Administration?

Historical spending patterns for medical consultant services by the Social Security Administration (SSA) are not provided in the current data. To understand this, one would need to analyze past contract awards for similar services, including BPAs, individual call orders, and other contract types. Examining trends in spending volume, average contract values, and the number of contractors utilized over several fiscal years would reveal patterns. This analysis would help determine if spending on these services is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether it aligns with changes in disability claim caseloads or policy.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social AssistanceOffices of PhysiciansOffices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICESOTHER MEDICAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5143 WESTMINSTER PL, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63108

Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,742

Exercised Options: $19,742

Current Obligation: $19,742

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 28321322AC0440013

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-07-01

Current End Date: 2027-06-30

Potential End Date: 2027-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-07

Other Social Security Administration Contracts

View all Social Security Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending