Social Security Administration awards $326K BPA for medical consultant services in Georgia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $326,122 ($326.1K)

Contractor: Telford-Tyler Janet

Awarding Agency: Social Security Administration

Start Date: 2026-07-01

End Date: 2027-06-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $896/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION (ATLANTA). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, DEKALB County, GEORGIA, 30307

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Social Security Administration obligated $326,121.6 to TELFORD-TYLER JANET for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION (ATLANTA). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on independent case reviews for disability claims. 2. Services are essential for the agency's disability determination process. 3. The contract is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) with a Firm Fixed Price. 4. The duration is one year, with potential for extension. 5. The contractor is Janet Telford-Tyler. 6. Geographic focus is the Southeast region, specifically Georgia.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $326,121.60 for one year of medical consultant services appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized disability claim reviews. However, without specific benchmarks for the number of cases reviewed or the complexity of those cases, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. Comparing this to similar contracts for independent medical reviews would provide better context. The firm fixed-price structure offers cost predictability for the agency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Small Acquisition Program). This suggests it may have been awarded under specific circumstances that bypassed full and open competition, potentially through an existing BPA or a limited solicitation. The lack of detailed competition information makes it difficult to assess the number of bidders or the impact on price discovery. Further investigation into the BPA's establishment and call order process is needed.

Taxpayer Impact: When contracts are not fully competed, taxpayers may not benefit from the most competitive pricing achievable through a broader solicitation process.

Public Impact

Benefits individuals applying for disability benefits by ensuring independent case reviews. Services support the Social Security Administration's mission to determine eligibility for disability programs. Geographic impact is concentrated in the Southeast region, particularly Georgia. Workforce implications include the need for qualified medical consultants with expertise in disability assessment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically medical consulting related to administrative and support services. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 621112, 'Offices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists,' indicates the type of expertise required. Spending in this area is driven by the government's need for specialized expertise to support program administration, particularly in complex areas like disability determination. Benchmarks for similar services would typically be found within government-wide contracts for professional services or agency-specific solicitations for medical review.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). As a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call order, the subcontracting implications would depend on the terms of the original BPA and any specific requirements for this call. Without further details on the BPA's structure, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though it does not appear to be a primary focus of this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Social Security Administration's program management and contracting offices. As a firm fixed-price agreement, the focus would be on ensuring the delivery of services as specified. Transparency is moderate, as the award is publicly available, but details regarding the competition and specific performance metrics are limited. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

healthcare, medical-consulting, social-security-administration, georgia, blanket-purchase-agreement, bpa-call-order, firm-fixed-price, not-competed, disability-claims, professional-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Social Security Administration awarded $326,121.6 to TELFORD-TYLER JANET. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR MEDICAL CONSULTANT SERVICES IN THE SOUTHEAST REGION (ATLANTA). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PROGRAM. CALL ORDER FOR INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TELFORD-TYLER JANET.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Social Security Administration (Social Security Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $326,121.6.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-07-01. End: 2027-06-30.

What is the specific volume of case files Janet Telford-Tyler is expected to review under this BPA call order?

The provided data does not specify the exact volume of case files Janet Telford-Tyler is expected to review. The contract is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call order for medical consultant services, indicating a need for reviews of disability claim case files. The total award amount of $326,121.60 suggests a significant workload, but the precise number of reviews would depend on the complexity of each case and the agreed-upon rate per review, which is not detailed in the summary data. Further information would be needed from the contract's statement of work or task order details to quantify the expected volume.

How does the $326,121.60 contract value compare to similar medical consultant services procured by the SSA or other agencies?

A direct comparison of the $326,121.60 contract value for medical consultant services is challenging without more specific details on the scope of work, such as the number of cases reviewed, the complexity of those cases, and the required qualifications of the consultants. However, for context, federal agencies often procure independent medical review services through various contract vehicles. The value appears moderate for a one-year engagement, suggesting it might cover a substantial number of reviews or specialized expertise. Benchmarking against similar BPAs or task orders issued by the SSA or other agencies for disability claim reviews would provide a more accurate assessment of its competitiveness and value.

What are the primary risks associated with a 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' contract for medical consulting services?

The primary risks associated with a contract awarded as 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Small Acquisition Program) include potentially higher costs due to a lack of competitive pricing, reduced innovation from a limited pool of bidders, and a perception of unfairness or lack of transparency. For medical consulting services, risks also extend to the quality and objectivity of the reviews if the selection process did not adequately vet multiple qualified providers. Taxpayers may not receive the best value for their money. Ensuring that the justification for limited competition was sound and that the selected contractor possesses the necessary expertise and provides services at a fair and reasonable price is crucial for mitigating these risks.

What is the track record of Janet Telford-Tyler in providing medical consultant services to the federal government?

The provided data identifies Janet Telford-Tyler as the contractor but does not offer details on their specific track record in providing medical consultant services to the federal government. To assess their past performance, one would typically look for contract history, past performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports), and any prior awards for similar services. Without this information, it is difficult to gauge their experience, reliability, and success in fulfilling government contracts. Further research into federal procurement databases or agency records would be necessary to evaluate their track record.

What is the expected impact of these medical consultant services on the efficiency of the SSA's disability determination process?

These medical consultant services are expected to enhance the efficiency of the SSA's disability determination process by providing independent, expert reviews of case files. By outsourcing or supplementing internal review capabilities, the SSA can potentially expedite the processing of claims, reduce backlogs, and ensure a more consistent and accurate assessment of medical eligibility. The engagement of specialized consultants can bring fresh perspectives and expertise, potentially leading to more informed decisions and fewer appeals. The effectiveness will depend on the quality of the consultants' reviews and their integration into the SSA's overall workflow.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social AssistanceOffices of PhysiciansOffices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICESOTHER MEDICAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1630 RIDGEWOOD DR NE, ATLANTA, GA, 30307

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $326,122

Exercised Options: $326,122

Current Obligation: $326,122

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 28321321AC0440027

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-07-01

Current End Date: 2027-06-30

Potential End Date: 2027-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

Other Social Security Administration Contracts

View all Social Security Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending