Social Security Administration awards $195,500 BPA Call for independent case reviews
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,550 ($19.6K)
Contractor: Lazaros Xanthopoulos
Awarding Agency: Social Security Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-01
End Date: 2026-06-30
Contract Duration: 90 days
Daily Burn Rate: $217/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: CALL ORDER FOR 200 INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.
Place of Performance
Location: NASHUA, HILLSBOROUGH County, NEW HAMPSHIRE, 03060
Plain-Language Summary
Social Security Administration obligated $19,550 to LAZAROS XANTHOPOULOS for work described as: CALL ORDER FOR 200 INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on independent case reviews, a critical function for program integrity. 2. The award was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures, suggesting potential for broader competition. 3. A firm-fixed-price contract type indicates defined scope and predictable costs. 4. The duration of 90 days suggests a short-term need for these services. 5. The contractor, Lazaros Xanthopoulos, is noted for this specific award. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 621111 points to physician offices, aligning with case review needs.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $195,500 for 90 days of service appears reasonable for specialized case reviews. Benchmarking against similar contracts for independent medical reviews or case assessments would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without more data on the number of reviews or the complexity of each case, a definitive value assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure offers cost certainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
This contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically allows for a broader range of competition. The specific details of why it was not competed more widely are not provided. A limited competition approach can sometimes lead to higher prices if the market is not fully explored, but it may also be justified by specific contractor qualifications or urgent needs.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of full and open competition means taxpayers may not have received the lowest possible price for these services. Further competition could have potentially driven down costs.
Public Impact
Beneficiaries of Social Security programs whose cases require independent review will be impacted. Services delivered include approximately 200 independent case reviews. The geographic impact is focused on New Hampshire, where the contractor is located. The contract supports the operational capacity of the Social Security Administration in processing case reviews.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition may have resulted in a higher price than a fully competed contract.
- The short duration of the contract raises questions about long-term planning for case review needs.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality and efficiency of the reviews.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability for the agency.
- The award is for a specific, defined task (200 case reviews), indicating clear objectives.
- The contractor is identified, allowing for tracking of performance on this specific task.
Sector Analysis
The healthcare services sector, specifically offices of physicians, is characterized by a high degree of specialization. Contracts for independent case reviews often fall under this umbrella, requiring specific medical or legal expertise. The market size for such services can be substantial, driven by the needs of government agencies like the Social Security Administration to ensure program integrity and compliance. This contract represents a small but important component of the broader healthcare services market.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting plans. The award to Lazaros Xanthopoulos, an individual or small firm, does not preclude broader small business participation in future, larger procurements. However, for this specific award, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is limited to the prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Social Security Administration's contracting officers and program managers. As a BPA Call, it is a task order against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement, implying some level of pre-qualification and oversight at the BPA level. Transparency is moderate, as the award is publicly reported, but detailed performance and cost breakdowns are not readily available.
Related Government Programs
- Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) Case Reviews
- Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Case Reviews
- Independent Medical Examinations
- Program Integrity Contracts
Risk Flags
- Limited Competition
- Short Contract Duration
- Lack of Detailed Performance Metrics
Tags
healthcare, social-security-administration, new-hampshire, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, limited-competition, offices-of-physicians, case-reviews, individual-contractor
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Social Security Administration awarded $19,550 to LAZAROS XANTHOPOULOS. CALL ORDER FOR 200 INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEWS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LAZAROS XANTHOPOULOS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Social Security Administration (Social Security Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19,550.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-06-30.
What is the typical cost per independent case review for the Social Security Administration?
The total contract value is $195,500 for approximately 200 case reviews, yielding a nominal cost of $977.50 per review. However, this is a preliminary calculation based on the total value and the stated number of reviews. The actual cost per review can vary significantly based on the complexity of each case, the specific expertise required (e.g., medical specialty, legal interpretation), and the time involved. Without detailed breakdowns of case complexity and time spent per case, this figure should be considered an average estimate. Benchmarking against historical SSA contracts or similar agency procurements for independent reviews would be necessary for a more accurate assessment of cost-effectiveness.
What is the track record of Lazaros Xanthopoulos with federal contracts?
Information regarding Lazaros Xanthopoulos's prior federal contracting history is limited based on the provided data. This specific award is a BPA Call valued at $195,500 for 200 independent case reviews. Without access to a comprehensive federal procurement database or past performance reviews, it is difficult to assess their broader track record. Key indicators to investigate would include the number of previous federal awards, the agencies they have served, the types of services provided, and any reported performance issues or successes. For this particular contract, the limited competition suggests a potential focus on specialized expertise or a pre-existing relationship, but further due diligence would be required to understand their overall performance history.
How does the competition level for this contract compare to similar SSA procurements?
This contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a limited competition approach. Typically, procurements under SAP are intended to foster competition among a wider range of vendors, especially for smaller dollar amounts. The fact that this was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' suggests it might have been awarded through other limited sources or potentially a sole-source justification, though 'limited' is specified. Comparing this to similar SSA procurements for case reviews would require analyzing the competition levels of other, comparable contracts. If most similar contracts are fully competed, this instance of limited competition might warrant further scrutiny regarding justification and potential impact on price.
What are the potential risks associated with a limited competition award for case reviews?
A primary risk associated with limited competition is the potential for higher costs to taxpayers, as the government may not benefit from the full price discovery that occurs in a robust, open market. There's also a risk of reduced innovation if vendors are not incentivized to differentiate themselves through competitive proposals. Furthermore, limited competition can sometimes indicate a lack of available qualified vendors or an over-reliance on a specific contractor, which can create vulnerabilities in service continuity if that contractor faces issues. For case reviews, ensuring the quality and impartiality of the reviews remains paramount, and limited competition could, in some scenarios, obscure potential biases or quality control issues if not managed carefully by the agency.
What is the historical spending pattern for independent case reviews by the SSA?
The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for independent case reviews by the Social Security Administration (SSA). To assess this, one would need to analyze SSA's procurement data over several fiscal years, identifying contracts with similar objectives (e.g., case reviews, medical assessments, eligibility determinations) and NAICS codes (like 621111). Key metrics to track would include the total annual spending on such services, the number of contracts awarded, the average contract value, the competition levels for these contracts, and the primary contractors involved. Understanding historical spending provides context for the current award's value and scope, and can reveal trends in agency needs and procurement strategies.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Offices of Physicians › Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND SURGICAL SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 309 BROOK VILLAGE RD, NASHUA, NH, 03062
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,550
Exercised Options: $19,550
Current Obligation: $19,550
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 28321324AC0140016
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-01
Current End Date: 2026-06-30
Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-01
Other Social Security Administration Contracts
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Contractor IS to Provide the Expertise, Technical Knowledge, IT Support Personnel, and Other Related Resources Necessary for Systems Analysis and Testing — $734.1M (Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation)
- Contractor to Provide Development&database Support to Agency's Office of Software Engineering — $593.5M (Leidos, Inc.)
- THE Government Intends to Establish a Single-Award Delivery Order Base Plus Four 1year Option Periods for the Renewal of IBM Software Maintenance and the Purchase of More Additional IBM Software Licenses Against the General Services Administrations Federal Supply Schedule Program. Previous Order SS00-15-30081 — $525.4M (International Business Machines Corporation)
- NEW 66 Month Open-Market Contract for Renewal of CA Software, Support Services, and Maintenance. CA Proprietary Software Products ARE Used Extensively Throughout OUR Mainframe and Distributed Environments AT ALL SSA Data Centers — $419.8M (CA, Inc.)