Treasury's $1.8M Pool Maintenance Contract Awarded to SLCGOOODS LLC for AFRH Home

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,386 ($18.4K)

Contractor: Slcgooods LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2025-05-01

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $51/day

Sector: Other

Official Description: POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT (AFRH) HOME.

Place of Performance

Location: Texas, 77441

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $18,386 to SLCGOOODS LLC for work described as: POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT (AFRH) HOME. Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the duration and scope of services. 2. Competition dynamics are not detailed, raising questions about price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a clear service period and single contractor. 4. Performance context is limited to pool maintenance for a specific facility. 5. Sector positioning is within government facility maintenance services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.84 million over approximately one year for pool maintenance services at the Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH) seems within a reasonable range for specialized facility upkeep. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for facility maintenance requires more granular data on the specific services included (e.g., chemical treatment, repairs, cleaning frequency). Without detailed service level agreements or comparisons to private sector pricing for comparable facilities, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the award to a single entity suggests a potentially streamlined process, though it limits direct price comparison.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The provided data does not specify the competition level for this contract. It is unclear if this was a full and open competition, a limited solicitation, or a sole-source award. The absence of information on the number of bidders or the solicitation method prevents an assessment of how effectively market forces were leveraged to achieve competitive pricing. If the contract was not competed broadly, there is a risk that the government may not have secured the most advantageous pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. Limited or no competition can lead to higher costs, meaning taxpayer funds are used less efficiently. Conversely, robust competition typically drives down prices and improves service quality.

Public Impact

Residents of the Armed Forces Retirement Home benefit from well-maintained recreational facilities. The contract ensures the operational readiness and safety of the swimming pool. Geographic impact is localized to the AFRH facility in Washington D.C. Workforce implications are likely minimal, involving a small team from the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of transparency regarding the procurement process limits assessment of competition.
  • Absence of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to gauge service quality.
  • Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs without adequate oversight.

Positive Signals

  • Contract awarded to a single entity, potentially simplifying management.
  • Clear service period (one year) provides defined expectations.
  • Focus on a specific, essential facility service.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader government facility maintenance and services sector. This sector encompasses a wide range of support services required to keep government buildings and grounds operational and safe. Spending in this area is consistent across various agencies, with contracts often varying in size and scope depending on the facility's needs. Benchmarking this specific pool maintenance contract against broader facility maintenance spending is difficult without more detailed service breakdowns, but it represents a niche within the larger services market.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss=false) and does not explicitly mention small business subcontracting goals (sb=false). Therefore, it is unlikely that small businesses were specifically targeted for this award. The absence of set-aside provisions means that larger businesses likely participated in the competition, and the impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor has its own subcontracting initiatives.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Bureau of the Fiscal Service within the Department of the Treasury. Accountability measures would be defined in the purchase order, including service level agreements and payment terms. Transparency is limited by the available data, as details on the procurement process and performance metrics are not publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

  • AFRH Facility Operations
  • Government Building Maintenance Contracts
  • Specialized Facility Services
  • Department of the Treasury Procurement

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition data
  • Limited performance metrics available
  • Unclear contractor past performance

Tags

facility-maintenance, pool-maintenance, department-of-the-treasury, bureau-of-the-fiscal-service, armed-forces-retirement-home, purchase-order, service-contract, washington-dc, medium-value-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $18,386 to SLCGOOODS LLC. POOL MAINTENANCE SERVICES ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT (AFRH) HOME.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SLCGOOODS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of the Fiscal Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18,386.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-05-01. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the track record of SLCGOOODS LLC in performing similar government contracts?

Information regarding the track record of SLCGOOODS LLC in performing similar government contracts is not provided in the data. To assess their reliability and past performance, a review of their contract history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues or successes on previous awards, would be necessary. This would involve searching federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS for previous awards to SLCGOOODS LLC and examining associated performance reports. Without this data, it's difficult to gauge their experience and capability in delivering pool maintenance services effectively.

How does the per-unit cost of this pool maintenance contract compare to market rates?

A direct per-unit cost comparison for this pool maintenance contract is challenging without more specific details on the services rendered and the size/complexity of the pool(s) at the AFRH Home. The total award is $1.84 million for approximately 364 days. This averages to roughly $5,055 per day. However, this daily rate encompasses all aspects of pool maintenance, including labor, chemicals, equipment, and potential repairs. To benchmark against market rates, one would need to identify comparable commercial pool maintenance contracts in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area that specify similar service inclusions and frequency. Private sector pricing can vary significantly based on the provider, service level, and facility specifics, making a precise comparison difficult without granular data.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential service disruptions if the contractor fails to perform adequately, leading to unusable pool facilities for residents. Another risk is cost overruns if unforeseen repairs are needed beyond the scope of routine maintenance, or if the initial pricing was not fully reflective of the actual service demands. Mitigation strategies would typically involve clearly defined service level agreements (SLAs) within the purchase order, performance monitoring by the contracting officer's representative (COR), and potentially performance bonds or financial assurances from the contractor. The limited duration (one year) also mitigates long-term risk exposure.

What is the historical spending pattern for pool maintenance services at the AFRH Home?

Historical spending patterns for pool maintenance services at the Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH) are not detailed in the provided data. To establish such a pattern, one would need to examine previous contract awards for these specific services at the AFRH Home over several fiscal years. This would involve querying federal procurement databases for contracts awarded to various vendors for pool maintenance at this location. Analyzing this historical data would reveal trends in contract values, duration, and potentially the number of bidders, offering insights into cost fluctuations and the consistency of service providers over time.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the overall operational budget of the AFRH Home?

The $1.84 million allocated for pool maintenance represents a specific line item within the overall operational budget of the Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH). The impact depends on the total budget allocated for facility maintenance and operations. If pool maintenance typically constitutes a significant portion of the facility's upkeep costs, this contract value could have a notable impact. Conversely, if the AFRH Home has a very large overall budget, this expenditure might be considered a standard, manageable cost for maintaining essential amenities. Without the AFRH Home's total budget figures, it's difficult to quantify the precise impact, but it is a dedicated allocation for a specific service.

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending