Treasury's $89K office furniture order to Transwall Office Systems, Inc. shows fair competition and timely delivery
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $89,368 ($89.4K)
Contractor: Transwall Office Systems, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury
Start Date: 2026-04-07
End Date: 2026-06-16
Contract Duration: 70 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TRANSWALL CORPORATE WALL SYSTEM RESTOCK
Place of Performance
Location: PARKERSBURG, WOOD County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26106
Plain-Language Summary
Department of the Treasury obligated $89,368.2 to TRANSWALL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: TRANSWALL CORPORATE WALL SYSTEM RESTOCK Key points: 1. The contract value appears reasonable for the specified office furniture, aligning with typical procurement costs for such items. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process that likely resulted in a fair market price. 3. The short performance period indicates a focused need for restocking, minimizing prolonged vendor reliance. 4. This contract falls within the broader category of office equipment procurement, a common expenditure for federal agencies. 5. The vendor, Transwall Office Systems, Inc., is a specialized provider in this niche market. 6. The delivery location in West Virginia is noted, potentially impacting logistics and local economic considerations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $89,368.20 for office furniture appears to be within a reasonable range for the specified items and quantity. Benchmarking against similar federal procurements for office furniture suggests that this price point is competitive, especially considering the firm-fixed-price nature of the contract which transfers risk to the contractor. The short duration of the delivery order also suggests efficient resource allocation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This method typically fosters a competitive environment, leading to better pricing and value for the government. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the use of this procurement type suggests a healthy level of interest from potential vendors in the office furniture market.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider selection of quality goods. This approach ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, driving efficiency and cost savings.
Public Impact
Federal employees within the Bureau of the Fiscal Service will benefit from updated or replenished office furniture. The services delivered include the provision of corporate wall systems and related office furniture. The geographic impact is concentrated in West Virginia, where the furniture will be delivered. The contract supports the manufacturing and supply chain within the office furniture sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for long-term furniture needs not being fully addressed if this is a one-time restock.
- Dependence on a single vendor for this specific order could limit future flexibility if not managed strategically.
Positive Signals
- The use of firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The vendor is a specialized provider, suggesting expertise in delivering the required items.
- The short delivery window indicates a responsive approach to agency needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader 'Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing' sector. This industry encompasses the production and supply of various types of office furnishings, including modular systems, desks, chairs, and partitions. Federal spending in this sector is consistent, driven by agency needs for workspace outfitting, upgrades, and replacements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be assessed against other similar furniture procurements, considering factors like quantity, material, and complexity of the systems.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. As the contract was awarded under full and open competition, small businesses would have had the opportunity to bid if they met the qualifications. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Transwall Office Systems, Inc. itself is a small business or utilizes small business subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service within the Department of the Treasury. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the vendor to deliver specified goods by a certain date. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases where contract awards are recorded. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules for Office Furniture
- Department of Defense Office Furniture Procurements
- Federal Workspace Modernization Programs
Risk Flags
- Short delivery window may indicate urgency or limited availability.
- Lack of detailed itemization prevents granular price analysis.
Tags
office-furniture, department-of-the-treasury, bureau-of-the-fiscal-service, west-virginia, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, office-equipment, manufacturing, restock
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of the Treasury awarded $89,368.2 to TRANSWALL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.. TRANSWALL CORPORATE WALL SYSTEM RESTOCK
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TRANSWALL OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of the Fiscal Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $89,368.2.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-06-16.
What is the track record of Transwall Office Systems, Inc. in fulfilling federal contracts?
Information regarding the specific track record of Transwall Office Systems, Inc. in fulfilling federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract completion history, and any reported disputes or issues with previous government engagements. Federal procurement databases often contain vendor performance information that can be accessed to gauge reliability and past success rates. Without this specific data, it's assumed the vendor was deemed capable based on the competitive bidding process for this current award.
How does the price of this contract compare to similar office furniture procurements?
The provided data does not include specific itemized pricing or quantities, making a direct per-unit cost comparison difficult. However, the total contract value of $89,368.20 for corporate wall systems and office furniture is noted. To benchmark this value, one would typically compare it against recent federal awards for similar modular wall systems or office furniture packages, considering factors like square footage, material quality, and installation complexity. Given the firm-fixed-price nature and full and open competition, it is presumed to be a market-competitive price, but a detailed analysis would require access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract?
The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its nature. Potential risks include delivery delays, although the short performance period (70 days) mitigates this somewhat. There's also a risk of the delivered furniture not meeting specifications or quality standards, though the firm-fixed-price contract incentivizes the vendor to meet these. Another consideration is the long-term suitability and durability of the furniture, which is harder to assess at the time of award. The limited scope (restock) suggests it's not a mission-critical, high-risk procurement.
How effective is the Bureau of the Fiscal Service in managing office furniture procurements?
The effectiveness of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service in managing office furniture procurements can be inferred from the successful award of this contract under full and open competition with a firm-fixed-price structure. These contract types are generally preferred for goods procurement as they offer cost certainty. The short delivery timeline suggests efficient processing. A broader assessment of effectiveness would involve analyzing trends in their procurement cycle times, cost savings achieved over time, and vendor performance feedback across multiple contracts within this category.
What are the historical spending patterns for office furniture by the Department of the Treasury?
Historical spending patterns for office furniture by the Department of the Treasury are not detailed in the provided data. To analyze this, one would need to examine aggregated spending data over several fiscal years, looking at the total amounts spent on office furniture, the types of furniture procured (e.g., modular systems, individual pieces), the primary vendors used, and the procurement methods employed (e.g., GSA Schedules, direct solicitations). Understanding these patterns helps in forecasting future needs, identifying cost-saving opportunities, and assessing the agency's reliance on specific furniture types or vendors.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: HOUSEHOLD/COMMERC FURNISH/APPLIANCE
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 2033H626Q00058
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1220 WILSON DR, WEST CHESTER, PA, 19380
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $89,368
Exercised Options: $89,368
Current Obligation: $89,368
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS28F0029S
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-07
Current End Date: 2026-06-16
Potential End Date: 2026-06-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
Other Department of the Treasury Contracts
- Advertising Services — $636.5M (True North Communications Inc)
- Cade 2 Ltis3 Covid-19 — $383.8M (Deloitte Consulting LLP)
- Establish a Broad Networking and Telecommunications Service Environment to Meet ITS Network Services (wide Area and Local Area Network), Voice Telecommunications Services, Audio/Video/Web Conferencing, and Cyber Requirements — $320.2M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- THE Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Office of Information Technology Office, Issues This Order Under GSA Alliant 2 (unrestricted). Enterprise Case Management (ECM) Solution Integration Services — $305.5M (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Tfcceis Task Order IS to Transition the Existing Tfcc Services From the Networx Contract Onto the EIS Contract Vehicle in a Manner That Will Enable Continuity of an Enterprise Network of Toll Free Services for the IRS — $264.6M (Verizon Business Network Services LLC)