Treasury's $1.5M contract for administrative support awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $153,078 ($153.1K)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2026-04-25

End Date: 2027-04-24

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $421/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 28

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE CONTRACT, BUDGET, TRAVEL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR MULTIPLE OFFICE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20220

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $153,077.57 to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE CONTRACT, BUDGET, TRAVEL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR MULTIPLE OFFICE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential administrative and logistical support for technical assistance projects. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Duration of one year with a cost-no-fee pricing structure. 4. The contract is for support services, not direct program delivery. 5. Geographic focus is Washington D.C.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of approximately $1.53 million for one year of administrative and logistical support appears within a reasonable range for such services, especially considering the complexity of supporting multiple technical assistance projects. However, without specific details on the scope of work and the number of personnel involved, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar contracts for comprehensive administrative and logistical support within federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of its cost-effectiveness. The cost-no-fee structure implies that the contractor is expected to cover all costs and deliver the service for the agreed-upon price, which can be advantageous if managed efficiently.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data does not specify the number of bids received, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service quality. The transparency of the process is a positive indicator for price discovery and ensuring taxpayer funds are used efficiently. The absence of specific bidder numbers prevents a deeper analysis of the competitive intensity.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the preferred method for federal procurements as it maximizes the opportunity for diverse vendors to compete, potentially driving down costs and improving the quality of services received by the government and, by extension, taxpayers.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the various Office of Technical Assistance projects within the Department of the Treasury, which will receive crucial support services. Services delivered include contract, budget, travel, administrative, and logistical support. The geographic impact is concentrated in the District of Columbia, where the services are likely performed. Workforce implications are primarily for the contractor's personnel providing the support services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the scope of work makes it difficult to fully assess value for money.
The number of bidders is not disclosed, limiting the assessment of competitive intensity.
Cost-no-fee structure requires careful contractor management to ensure all costs are covered without impacting service quality.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust and transparent procurement process.
Contract provides essential support services, enabling the Office of Technical Assistance to focus on its core mission.
Clear contract end date provides a defined period for service delivery and future re-evaluation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on administrative and support functions. The federal government is a significant consumer of such services to manage its vast operations and programs. Comparable spending benchmarks for administrative support contracts can vary widely based on the specific services, duration, and agency. However, contracts of this size are common across many departments for specialized support needs that are not core government functions.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business set-aside was not utilized for this contract (ss: false) and that there is no specific mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses (sb: false). This suggests that the primary focus of the competition was not on engaging small businesses directly or indirectly. While this contract may not directly benefit small businesses through set-asides, the prime contractor could potentially engage small businesses as subcontractors if it aligns with their operational strategy, though this is not mandated by the contract terms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Treasury responsible for the Office of Technical Assistance projects. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and the cost-no-fee pricing structure. Transparency is facilitated by the contract's award through full and open competition. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction is not detailed, the Treasury IG generally has oversight over departmental spending and contract performance.

Related Government Programs

Federal Administrative Support Services
Office of Technical Assistance Contracts
Department of the Treasury Support Contracts
Logistical Support Services
Contract Management Support

Risk Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics.
Limited detail on the number of bidders.
Scope of work is broadly defined.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $153,077.57 to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE CONTRACT, BUDGET, TRAVEL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR MULTIPLE OFFICE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $153,077.57.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-25. End: 2027-04-24.

What is the specific breakdown of services required under this contract?

The contract is described as providing 'PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE CONTRACT, BUDGET, TRAVEL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND LOGISTICAL SUPPORT FOR MULTIPLE OFFICE OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS.' This encompasses a broad range of support functions essential for the operation of technical assistance initiatives. Specific tasks likely include managing contract documentation, assisting with budget tracking and financial reporting, coordinating travel arrangements for project staff, handling general administrative duties such as correspondence and record-keeping, and providing logistical support for meetings, events, or project-related activities. The exact deliverables and performance metrics would be detailed in the contract's statement of work, which is not publicly available in this data snippet.

How does the 'cost-no-fee' pricing structure impact contractor incentives and risk?

A 'cost-no-fee' (CNF) contract means the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred in performing the contract, but receives no additional fee or profit. This structure places the financial risk entirely on the contractor. Their incentive is to perform the work efficiently and within budget to avoid incurring costs that exceed the reimbursement. For the government, it can be advantageous as it limits the total expenditure to the actual costs incurred. However, it can also disincentivize the contractor from seeking innovative or cost-saving measures beyond what is necessary to fulfill the contract, as there is no direct financial reward for doing so. Careful monitoring of costs and performance is crucial for the government under a CNF agreement.

What is the typical duration and value range for similar administrative support contracts within the federal government?

Federal administrative support contracts vary significantly in duration and value depending on the scope, complexity, and agency. One-year contracts, like this one, are common for defined periods of support or initial service periods, often with options for extension. Values can range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars. For contracts providing comprehensive support for multiple projects, a value of approximately $1.5 million for a year is not unusual, particularly if it involves dedicated personnel and significant logistical coordination. Benchmarking requires comparing contracts with similar service descriptions, personnel levels, and geographic locations, which often necessitates access to more detailed procurement data or specialized cost-estimating tools.

What are the potential implications of awarding this contract in Washington D.C.?

Awarding this contract in Washington D.C. has several implications. Firstly, it suggests that the services are either performed on-site at Treasury facilities or require close proximity to agency headquarters for effective coordination and support of the Office of Technical Assistance projects. This location may also influence labor costs, as the cost of living and doing business in D.C. can be higher than in other regions, potentially impacting the contractor's pricing. Furthermore, it concentrates the contract's economic impact within the D.C. metropolitan area. For the government, having support staff located in close proximity can facilitate communication, collaboration, and rapid response to evolving project needs.

How does the 'full and open competition' method influence the selection of contractors for administrative support?

Full and open competition is the statutory preferred method for federal contracting, designed to ensure that all responsible sources are given a fair opportunity to compete. For administrative support contracts, this means that any qualified company, regardless of size or previous relationship with the agency, can submit a proposal. This process typically involves issuing a solicitation that clearly outlines the requirements, evaluation criteria, and terms. The agency then evaluates proposals based on these criteria, which often include a combination of technical approach, past performance, and price. The goal is to select the offeror that provides the best overall value to the government. This method promotes a wider pool of potential contractors, potentially leading to more innovative solutions and competitive pricing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Public Administration › National Security and International Affairs › International Affairs

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 2032K825R00017

Offers Received: 28

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $961,873

Exercised Options: $181,173

Current Obligation: $153,078

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline