Treasury's BEP Awards $3.18M SharePoint Support Contract to Quality Solutions Alliance, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,177,838 ($3.2M)

Contractor: Quality Solutions Alliance, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2025-09-15

End Date: 2026-09-14

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: SHAREPOINT WEB APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES - CONTRACTOR SUPPORT FOR THE BUREAU INTERNET AND INTRANET SITE, MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURED QUERY LANGUAGE DATABASES, AND MICROSOFT PROJECT SERVER APPLICATION

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20228

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $3.2 million to QUALITY SOLUTIONS ALLIANCE, LLC for work described as: SHAREPOINT WEB APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES - CONTRACTOR SUPPORT FOR THE BUREAU INTERNET AND INTRANET SITE, MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURED QUERY LANGUAGE DATABASES, AND MICROSOFT PROJECT SERVER APPLICATION Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical Microsoft SharePoint and Project Server environments. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources'. 3. Risk of vendor lock-in is mitigated by open competition, but specific exclusions warrant review. 4. IT services sector, specifically computer systems design, is a common area for such support contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.18M for one year of support appears reasonable for specialized SharePoint and Project Server services. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for complex IT environments is necessary for a definitive assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources'. While this indicates competition, the specific reasons for excluding other sources need to be understood to ensure the broadest possible competition and best price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential IT infrastructure support. The competitive award process aims to ensure value for money, but the exclusion of sources could potentially limit optimal pricing.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation and maintenance of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing's internal and external websites. Supports critical Microsoft SharePoint and Project Server applications vital for agency operations. Potential impact on employees relying on these platforms for daily tasks and information access. Contract duration of one year with a firm fixed price provides budget certainty.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Exclusion of sources in a 'full and open' competition needs justification.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
  • Potential for scope creep in ongoing support services.

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed price contract type limits cost overrun risk.
  • One-year duration allows for re-evaluation of needs and competition.
  • Awarded to a company with a specific contract vehicle (Quality Solutions Alliance, LLC).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically computer systems design. Government spending in this area is substantial, supporting a wide range of agency operations. Benchmarks for similar SharePoint support contracts vary based on complexity and scope.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this specific award or if the contract vehicle itself is set aside for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Treasury's Bureau of Engraving and Printing is responsible for this contract. Standard government oversight processes for contract performance and financial management should be in place.

Related Government Programs

  • Computer Systems Design Services
  • Department of the Treasury Contracting
  • Bureau of Engraving and Printing Programs

Risk Flags

  • Justification for excluded sources needs review.
  • Potential for vendor lock-in if specific technologies are heavily relied upon.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical IT infrastructure.
  • Scope creep risk in ongoing support services.

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-the-treasury, dc, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $3.2 million to QUALITY SOLUTIONS ALLIANCE, LLC. SHAREPOINT WEB APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES - CONTRACTOR SUPPORT FOR THE BUREAU INTERNET AND INTRANET SITE, MICROSOFT SHAREPOINT ENVIRONMENT, STRUCTURED QUERY LANGUAGE DATABASES, AND MICROSOFT PROJECT SERVER APPLICATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is QUALITY SOLUTIONS ALLIANCE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-15. End: 2026-09-14.

What specific services are included under 'SharePoint Web Application Support' to ensure comprehensive coverage and prevent gaps?

The contract specifies support for the Bureau's internet and intranet sites, the Microsoft SharePoint environment, structured query language databases, and the Microsoft Project Server application. This implies a broad scope covering infrastructure, application maintenance, database management, and user support for these critical systems.

How does the 'Exclusion of Sources' clause in this 'Full and Open Competition' impact the potential for cost savings?

While 'Full and Open Competition' generally promotes competitive pricing, the exclusion of specific sources, even if justified, could limit the number of bidders. This might reduce the downward pressure on prices compared to a scenario with unrestricted competition, potentially leading to a higher-than-optimal cost for taxpayers.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of this SharePoint support contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Effective oversight would require defined metrics related to system uptime, response times for support requests, issue resolution rates, and user satisfaction to ensure the contractor is meeting performance expectations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 2031ZB25Q00081

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 111 N 2ND ST, SMITHFIELD, NC, 27577

Business Categories: Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,177,838

Exercised Options: $3,177,838

Current Obligation: $3,177,838

Actual Outlays: $1,191,689

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCB21D0349

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-15

Current End Date: 2026-09-14

Potential End Date: 2026-09-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-02-24

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending