Treasury's Bureau of Engraving and Printing awards $19.7M contract for police uniforms and equipment to M-PAK, INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,668 ($19.7K)

Contractor: M-Pak, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-04-24

Contract Duration: 18 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: POLICE UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT.

Place of Performance

Location: ALEDO, PARKER County, TEXAS, 76008

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $19,667.5 to M-PAK, INC. for work described as: POLICE UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to M-PAK, INC. for police uniforms and equipment. 2. The contract has a duration of 18 months. 3. The contract is a Firm Fixed Price type. 4. The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures). 5. The award was made as a BPA Call. 6. The vendor is located in Texas.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value is $19.7 million. Without specific details on the quantity and type of uniforms and equipment, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures, which typically implies smaller dollar values and potentially less rigorous price competition than larger, full-and-open procurements. Benchmarking against similar contracts for police uniforms and equipment would be necessary for a more definitive assessment of pricing and value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggesting a limited competition environment. SAP is generally used for procurements below certain dollar thresholds, allowing for more streamlined processes. The number of bidders is not specified, but the use of SAP often indicates fewer than the number typically seen in full-and-open competitions. This level of competition may not yield the most aggressive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition under SAP may result in higher prices for taxpayers compared to a broader, full-and-open competition where more vendors could potentially bid and drive down costs.

Public Impact

Provides essential police uniforms and equipment to the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Ensures law enforcement personnel have necessary gear for their duties. Supports the operational readiness of security forces within the Treasury Department. The contract is expected to impact the workforce by providing necessary equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition may lead to suboptimal pricing.
Lack of detailed specifications makes value assessment difficult.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a single vendor, M-PAK, INC.
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty.
Contract duration of 18 months allows for consistent supply.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing sector. This sector encompasses businesses that produce a wide range of clothing and related items. Federal spending in this area often supports law enforcement, military, and other government agencies requiring specialized apparel. The market size for uniform and equipment supply is substantial, driven by the ongoing needs of numerous public safety organizations.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not provided in the data. Without this information, it is difficult to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem. Typically, federal contracts of this nature may include provisions for small business participation, but this cannot be confirmed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Bureau of Engraving and Printing within the Department of the Treasury. Standard procurement regulations and contract management practices would apply. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, though specific performance monitoring details are not available.

Related Government Programs

Law Enforcement Equipment Procurement
Uniform Supply Contracts
Department of the Treasury Spending

Risk Flags

Limited Competition
Lack of Detailed Item Specifications
Unknown Contractor Performance History

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $19,667.5 to M-PAK, INC.. POLICE UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is M-PAK, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19,667.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-04-24.

What is the specific breakdown of uniform and equipment items included in this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'POLICE UNIFORMS AND EQUIPMENT' but does not specify the exact items. A detailed breakdown would typically include quantities and specifications for items such as shirts, pants, jackets, duty belts, holsters, body armor, and other protective gear. Understanding this breakdown is crucial for assessing the unit costs and overall value proposition of the contract. Without this granular detail, it's challenging to benchmark against market prices or determine if the $19.7 million represents a fair price for the goods delivered.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar police uniform and equipment contracts awarded by other federal agencies?

Benchmarking this contract's pricing against similar procurements is difficult without specific item details and quantities. However, given it was competed under SAP, it is plausible that the pricing might be higher than contracts awarded through full-and-open competition with a larger number of bidders. To perform a true comparison, one would need to identify contracts with comparable scope, volume, and item specifications from agencies like the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, or Department of Defense, and then analyze their unit costs and total values.

What is the track record of M-PAK, INC. in supplying police uniforms and equipment to government entities?

The provided data identifies M-PAK, INC. as the contractor but does not offer details on their past performance or track record. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their contract history, including any previous awards for similar items, their performance ratings on those contracts, and any instances of disputes or contract terminations. This information is typically available through government contract databases and performance reporting systems, which would shed light on their reliability and capability to fulfill this current award.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?

The data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for uniform and equipment contracts, KPIs would focus on delivery timeliness, quality of goods (meeting specifications), accuracy of orders, and vendor responsiveness to issues. The Bureau of Engraving and Printing would likely have established metrics to ensure M-PAK, INC. meets its contractual obligations effectively. Monitoring these KPIs is essential for ensuring the government receives the best value and that the equipment meets the operational needs of the police force.

What is the historical spending pattern for police uniforms and equipment by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for police uniforms and equipment by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. To understand this, one would need to analyze past contract awards for similar goods and services over several fiscal years. This analysis would reveal trends in spending, identify potential increases or decreases in demand, and highlight any shifts in contracting strategies or vendor relationships. Such historical context is vital for evaluating the current contract's value and ensuring fiscal responsibility.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing › Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: CLOTHING, INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT, INSIGNA, AND JEWELRY

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11255 CAMP BOWIE WEST BLVD, ALEDO, TX, 76008

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,668

Exercised Options: $19,668

Current Obligation: $19,668

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 2031ZA25A00006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline