Treasury's $221.5K solid waste contract awarded to Wilburn Hauling Inc. for DC and MD facilities

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $221,500 ($221.5K)

Contractor: Wilburn Hauling Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2025-06-17

End Date: 2026-06-17

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $607/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SOLID WASTE REMOVAL FOR THE WASHINGTON, DC FACILITY AND THE LANDOVER, MD WAREHOUSE.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20228

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $221,500 to WILBURN HAULING INC for work described as: SOLID WASTE REMOVAL FOR THE WASHINGTON, DC FACILITY AND THE LANDOVER, MD WAREHOUSE. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of services. 2. Limited competition due to contract type raises questions about optimal pricing. 3. Performance risk seems low given the nature of solid waste removal. 4. Contract duration of one year provides flexibility for future needs. 5. Sector positioning is within essential facility support services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $221,500 for one year of solid waste removal services for two facilities appears to be within a reasonable range. Benchmarking against similar municipal or commercial waste removal contracts of comparable scale and service level would provide a more precise value assessment. However, without specific details on volume, frequency, and types of waste, a definitive value-for-money judgment is challenging. The firm fixed-price structure suggests cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. The specific justification for this approach is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source awards occur when only one responsible source can fulfill the requirement. This lack of broad competition may limit the government's ability to secure the most competitive pricing and potentially overlooks other capable vendors.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of a competitive bidding process means taxpayers may not be benefiting from the lowest possible price that could have been achieved through open market competition.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Treasury's Bureau of Engraving and Printing facilities in Washington, DC, and Landover, MD. The service delivered is essential solid waste collection and disposal. The geographic impact is localized to the District of Columbia and Maryland. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team from the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Sole-source justification needs further review to ensure necessity.
Limited transparency in vendor selection process.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to a specific company, potentially supporting a known vendor.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Clear service delivery location and duration.

Sector Analysis

Solid waste collection and disposal is a critical component of facility management across all sectors, including government operations. The market for these services is generally localized and competitive, though specific government contracts can sometimes be awarded non-competitively. This contract fits within the broader facilities support services category, ensuring operational continuity for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a sole-source award, it is unlikely that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were a primary consideration or requirement within the solicitation. Further investigation would be needed to determine if the prime contractor, Wilburn Hauling Inc., is itself a small business or if any subcontracting plans exist.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Bureau of Engraving and Printing's contracting and facility management divisions within the Department of the Treasury. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, focusing on service delivery and compliance. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, with details on the justification for non-competition not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Government Waste Management Services
Bureau of Engraving and Printing Operations Support

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competitive justification.
Potential for non-competitive pricing.
Limited transparency in vendor selection.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $221,500 to WILBURN HAULING INC. SOLID WASTE REMOVAL FOR THE WASHINGTON, DC FACILITY AND THE LANDOVER, MD WAREHOUSE.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WILBURN HAULING INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $221,500.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-17. End: 2026-06-17.

What is the specific justification for awarding this solid waste removal contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data states the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a sole-source award. However, the specific justification for this determination is not included. Typically, agencies must document why a full and open competition is not feasible, such as the existence of only one responsible source, urgent and compelling circumstances, or specific statutory authority. Without this documentation, it is difficult to assess if the sole-source award was appropriate and in the government's best interest. This lack of competition can limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitively awarded contract.

How does the contract value of $221,500 compare to market rates for similar services in the Washington, DC and Landover, MD areas?

Benchmarking the $221,500 contract value requires detailed information on the scope of services, including waste volume, pickup frequency, types of waste (e.g., general refuse, recycling, hazardous), and specific service locations. However, for a one-year contract covering solid waste removal for two facilities, this amount appears to be within a plausible range for commercial services in the DC metropolitan area. A more precise comparison would involve analyzing pricing data from similar government contracts or commercial waste management providers operating in the same geographic region, considering factors like contract duration and service level agreements.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for essential services like solid waste removal?

The primary risk of a sole-source award for essential services like solid waste removal is the potential for inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without multiple bidders vying for the contract, the awarded vendor may not offer the most cost-effective solution. Additionally, a sole-source award can limit innovation and service improvements that might arise from a competitive environment. There's also a risk of vendor complacency or reduced incentive to maintain high service standards when there is no immediate threat of losing the contract to a competitor. Ensuring the sole-source justification is robust and regularly reviewed is crucial to mitigate these risks.

What is the track record of Wilburn Hauling Inc. in performing government contracts, particularly for the Department of the Treasury?

Information regarding the specific track record of Wilburn Hauling Inc. in performing government contracts, especially for the Department of the Treasury, is not provided in the given data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes. Understanding their experience with similar types of services, contract values, and agency requirements would provide valuable insight into their reliability and capability to fulfill the current contract effectively. Without this historical data, assessing contractor performance risk is speculative.

What are the historical spending patterns for solid waste removal services at the Washington, DC facility and the Landover, MD warehouse?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for solid waste removal at these specific facilities. To analyze historical trends, one would need access to previous contract awards for these services, including contract values, durations, and awarded vendors over several fiscal years. This information would help determine if current spending is consistent with past expenditures, if costs have increased or decreased over time, and whether the services have been consistently provided by the same contractors or through competitive processes. Such analysis is crucial for identifying potential cost savings or budget anomalies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Waste Collection › Solid Waste Collection

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6305 IVY LN, GREENBELT, MD, 20770

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,201,100

Exercised Options: $221,500

Current Obligation: $221,500

Actual Outlays: $118,872

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline