Treasury's Mint awards $17.8M for silver, with 7-day delivery, under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,824,531 ($17.8M)

Contractor: Stonex Financial Ltd

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2025-03-11

End Date: 2025-03-18

Contract Duration: 7 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.5M/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SILVER RAW MATERIAL

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $17.8 million to STONEX FINANCIAL LTD for work described as: SILVER RAW MATERIAL Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in raw materials for minting operations. 2. Competition dynamics suggest potential for favorable pricing due to the full and open nature of the award. 3. The short performance period indicates a need for immediate material supply, potentially mitigating inventory risks. 4. This award is a key component of the Mint's production cycle for precious metal products. 5. The fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the government. 6. The supplier's role in providing essential raw materials highlights critical supply chain dependencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award of $17.8 million for silver material appears reasonable given the quantity and short delivery window. Benchmarking against market prices for silver during the award period would provide a more precise value assessment. Compared to other raw material procurements, the price per unit (though not explicitly provided here) should be evaluated against historical trends and bulk purchase agreements to ensure optimal value for taxpayers.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of three bidders (implied by 'no': 3) suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive environment is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation from suppliers.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayers benefit from the most competitive pricing available in the market, as multiple firms vied for the contract.

Public Impact

The United States Mint benefits directly through the acquisition of essential silver raw material for its production. This contract supports the production of coinage and potentially other precious metal products, serving collectors and investors. The geographic impact is primarily national, as the Mint's products are distributed across the United States. Workforce implications are indirect, supporting jobs within the silver supply chain and at the Mint's manufacturing facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential price volatility of silver commodity markets could impact the long-term value realization.
  • Dependence on a single supplier for a critical raw material introduces supply chain risk.
  • Ensuring consistent quality of the raw silver material is crucial for minting operations.

Positive Signals

  • The award was made under full and open competition, maximizing the potential for competitive pricing.
  • The firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
  • The short delivery period suggests efficient logistical planning and execution by the contractor.

Sector Analysis

The procurement of precious metals like silver falls within the broader industrial materials and mining sector. This contract is a specific instance of raw material acquisition for a government entity. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other government contracts for similar quantities of silver or other precious metals, as well as private sector bulk purchases of industrial-grade silver.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract included a small business set-aside. Given the nature of raw material procurement for a large government entity, it is likely that the primary awardee is a large business. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist within the supply chain for processing or transportation, but are not explicitly detailed in this award.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Treasury's Office of Inspector General likely has oversight jurisdiction over this contract. Transparency is facilitated through public contract award databases. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified materials.

Related Government Programs

  • Precious Metals Management
  • Coinage Production
  • Government Procurement of Raw Materials
  • Industrial Metals Supply Chain

Risk Flags

  • Commodity Price Volatility
  • Supply Chain Disruption Risk
  • Short Delivery Window Pressure

Tags

sector-other, agency-department-of-the-treasury, agency-united-states-mint, contract-type-delivery-order, competition-full-and-open, material-silver, price-firm-fixed-price, duration-short, naics-331410, material-nonferrous-metal

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $17.8 million to STONEX FINANCIAL LTD. SILVER RAW MATERIAL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STONEX FINANCIAL LTD.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (United States Mint).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-03-11. End: 2025-03-18.

What is the historical spending pattern for silver raw material by the United States Mint?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for silver raw material by the United States Mint requires access to detailed historical procurement data. Typically, the Mint procures silver based on anticipated demand for circulating coinage, bullion coins (like American Silver Eagles), and collector coins. Spending can fluctuate significantly year-over-year due to changes in precious metal prices, production targets, and legislative mandates. For instance, the demand for American Silver Eagles has historically been high, leading to substantial silver purchases. Comparing the current $17.8 million award to previous years' expenditures for similar quantities, adjusted for market price variations, would reveal trends in procurement volume and cost efficiency. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to ascertain if this award represents an increase or decrease in typical spending.

How does the price per pound of silver in this contract compare to the spot market price at the time of award?

To compare the price per pound of silver in this contract to the spot market price, we would need to know the exact quantity of silver procured in pounds or kilograms. The award amount is $17,824,531.18. If we assume the contract is for a specific weight of silver, we can divide the total award by that weight to get a per-pound cost. For example, if the contract was for 1 million pounds of silver, the cost per pound would be approximately $17.82. This figure would then be compared to the prevailing spot market price for silver on or around March 11, 2025. Spot prices for silver can fluctuate daily, even hourly. A comparison would reveal whether the Mint secured a favorable price, potentially due to bulk purchasing power or negotiation, or if the price was in line with or above market rates. This analysis is crucial for assessing value for money.

What are the risks associated with a short 7-day delivery period for critical raw materials?

A short 7-day delivery period for critical raw materials like silver presents several risks. Firstly, it places significant logistical pressure on the contractor to source, process, and deliver the material within a very tight timeframe. Any disruption in the contractor's supply chain, transportation, or internal processing could lead to delays, impacting the Mint's production schedule. Secondly, it limits the Mint's ability to conduct extensive quality inspections upon receipt, potentially increasing the risk of accepting non-conforming material. Thirdly, it reduces the government's flexibility if unforeseen issues arise with the material or the delivery process. While a short window might indicate urgency or efficient planning, it also heightens the potential for immediate disruption if any part of the delivery chain fails.

What is the track record of STONEX FINANCIAL LTD in supplying raw materials to government agencies?

Assessing the track record of STONEX FINANCIAL LTD in supplying raw materials to government agencies requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts. This would involve searching contract databases for previous awards to STONEX FINANCIAL LTD, particularly for similar raw materials or industrial goods. Key performance indicators to examine would include on-time delivery, adherence to quality specifications, and overall customer satisfaction ratings, if available. A history of successful, timely, and compliant deliveries to government entities would indicate a lower performance risk for this current award. Conversely, any past issues with delivery, quality, or contract disputes could raise concerns about STONEX FINANCIAL LTD's reliability as a supplier for the United States Mint.

How does the firm fixed-price contract type mitigate financial risk for the government in this silver procurement?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type significantly mitigates financial risk for the government in this silver procurement. Under an FFP agreement, the contractor, STONEX FINANCIAL LTD, is obligated to deliver the specified quantity and quality of silver for a predetermined price. This means that any fluctuations in the market price of silver between the time the contract is awarded and the time of delivery will not affect the total cost to the government. The government's financial exposure is capped at the agreed-upon contract value of $17,824,531.18. This contrasts with cost-reimbursement contracts, where the government would bear the risk of cost overruns. Therefore, the FFP structure provides budget certainty and protects the taxpayer from potential increases in the commodity price of silver.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingNonferrous Metal (except Aluminum) Production and ProcessingNonferrous Metal (except Aluminum) Smelting and Refining

Product/Service Code: ORES, MINERALS AND PRIMARY PRODUCTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1ST FLOOR, LONDON

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, International Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,824,531

Exercised Options: $17,824,531

Current Obligation: $17,824,531

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 2031JG21D00023

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-03-11

Current End Date: 2025-03-18

Potential End Date: 2025-03-18 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-07-25

More Contracts from Stonex Financial Ltd

View all Stonex Financial Ltd federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending