Treasury's Mint awards $17.8M for silver, with 7-day delivery, under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,824,531 ($17.8M)
Contractor: Stonex Financial Ltd
Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury
Start Date: 2025-03-11
End Date: 2025-03-18
Contract Duration: 7 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.5M/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: SILVER RAW MATERIAL
Plain-Language Summary
Department of the Treasury obligated $17.8 million to STONEX FINANCIAL LTD for work described as: SILVER RAW MATERIAL Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in raw materials for minting operations. 2. Competition dynamics suggest potential for favorable pricing due to the full and open nature of the award. 3. The short performance period indicates a need for immediate material supply, potentially mitigating inventory risks. 4. This award is a key component of the Mint's production cycle for precious metal products. 5. The fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the government. 6. The supplier's role in providing essential raw materials highlights critical supply chain dependencies.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The award of $17.8 million for silver material appears reasonable given the quantity and short delivery window. Benchmarking against market prices for silver during the award period would provide a more precise value assessment. Compared to other raw material procurements, the price per unit (though not explicitly provided here) should be evaluated against historical trends and bulk purchase agreements to ensure optimal value for taxpayers.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of three bidders (implied by 'no': 3) suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive environment is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation from suppliers.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayers benefit from the most competitive pricing available in the market, as multiple firms vied for the contract.
Public Impact
The United States Mint benefits directly through the acquisition of essential silver raw material for its production. This contract supports the production of coinage and potentially other precious metal products, serving collectors and investors. The geographic impact is primarily national, as the Mint's products are distributed across the United States. Workforce implications are indirect, supporting jobs within the silver supply chain and at the Mint's manufacturing facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential price volatility of silver commodity markets could impact the long-term value realization.
- Dependence on a single supplier for a critical raw material introduces supply chain risk.
- Ensuring consistent quality of the raw silver material is crucial for minting operations.
Positive Signals
- The award was made under full and open competition, maximizing the potential for competitive pricing.
- The firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- The short delivery period suggests efficient logistical planning and execution by the contractor.
Sector Analysis
The procurement of precious metals like silver falls within the broader industrial materials and mining sector. This contract is a specific instance of raw material acquisition for a government entity. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other government contracts for similar quantities of silver or other precious metals, as well as private sector bulk purchases of industrial-grade silver.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract included a small business set-aside. Given the nature of raw material procurement for a large government entity, it is likely that the primary awardee is a large business. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist within the supply chain for processing or transportation, but are not explicitly detailed in this award.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Treasury's Office of Inspector General likely has oversight jurisdiction over this contract. Transparency is facilitated through public contract award databases. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified materials.
Related Government Programs
- Precious Metals Management
- Coinage Production
- Government Procurement of Raw Materials
- Industrial Metals Supply Chain
Risk Flags
- Commodity Price Volatility
- Supply Chain Disruption Risk
- Short Delivery Window Pressure
Tags
sector-other, agency-department-of-the-treasury, agency-united-states-mint, contract-type-delivery-order, competition-full-and-open, material-silver, price-firm-fixed-price, duration-short, naics-331410, material-nonferrous-metal
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of the Treasury awarded $17.8 million to STONEX FINANCIAL LTD. SILVER RAW MATERIAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is STONEX FINANCIAL LTD.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (United States Mint).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-03-11. End: 2025-03-18.
What is the historical spending pattern for silver raw material by the United States Mint?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for silver raw material by the United States Mint requires access to detailed historical procurement data. Typically, the Mint procures silver based on anticipated demand for circulating coinage, bullion coins (like American Silver Eagles), and collector coins. Spending can fluctuate significantly year-over-year due to changes in precious metal prices, production targets, and legislative mandates. For instance, the demand for American Silver Eagles has historically been high, leading to substantial silver purchases. Comparing the current $17.8 million award to previous years' expenditures for similar quantities, adjusted for market price variations, would reveal trends in procurement volume and cost efficiency. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to ascertain if this award represents an increase or decrease in typical spending.
How does the price per pound of silver in this contract compare to the spot market price at the time of award?
To compare the price per pound of silver in this contract to the spot market price, we would need to know the exact quantity of silver procured in pounds or kilograms. The award amount is $17,824,531.18. If we assume the contract is for a specific weight of silver, we can divide the total award by that weight to get a per-pound cost. For example, if the contract was for 1 million pounds of silver, the cost per pound would be approximately $17.82. This figure would then be compared to the prevailing spot market price for silver on or around March 11, 2025. Spot prices for silver can fluctuate daily, even hourly. A comparison would reveal whether the Mint secured a favorable price, potentially due to bulk purchasing power or negotiation, or if the price was in line with or above market rates. This analysis is crucial for assessing value for money.
What are the risks associated with a short 7-day delivery period for critical raw materials?
A short 7-day delivery period for critical raw materials like silver presents several risks. Firstly, it places significant logistical pressure on the contractor to source, process, and deliver the material within a very tight timeframe. Any disruption in the contractor's supply chain, transportation, or internal processing could lead to delays, impacting the Mint's production schedule. Secondly, it limits the Mint's ability to conduct extensive quality inspections upon receipt, potentially increasing the risk of accepting non-conforming material. Thirdly, it reduces the government's flexibility if unforeseen issues arise with the material or the delivery process. While a short window might indicate urgency or efficient planning, it also heightens the potential for immediate disruption if any part of the delivery chain fails.
What is the track record of STONEX FINANCIAL LTD in supplying raw materials to government agencies?
Assessing the track record of STONEX FINANCIAL LTD in supplying raw materials to government agencies requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts. This would involve searching contract databases for previous awards to STONEX FINANCIAL LTD, particularly for similar raw materials or industrial goods. Key performance indicators to examine would include on-time delivery, adherence to quality specifications, and overall customer satisfaction ratings, if available. A history of successful, timely, and compliant deliveries to government entities would indicate a lower performance risk for this current award. Conversely, any past issues with delivery, quality, or contract disputes could raise concerns about STONEX FINANCIAL LTD's reliability as a supplier for the United States Mint.
How does the firm fixed-price contract type mitigate financial risk for the government in this silver procurement?
The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type significantly mitigates financial risk for the government in this silver procurement. Under an FFP agreement, the contractor, STONEX FINANCIAL LTD, is obligated to deliver the specified quantity and quality of silver for a predetermined price. This means that any fluctuations in the market price of silver between the time the contract is awarded and the time of delivery will not affect the total cost to the government. The government's financial exposure is capped at the agreed-upon contract value of $17,824,531.18. This contrasts with cost-reimbursement contracts, where the government would bear the risk of cost overruns. Therefore, the FFP structure provides budget certainty and protects the taxpayer from potential increases in the commodity price of silver.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Nonferrous Metal (except Aluminum) Production and Processing › Nonferrous Metal (except Aluminum) Smelting and Refining
Product/Service Code: ORES, MINERALS AND PRIMARY PRODUCTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1ST FLOOR, LONDON
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, International Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,824,531
Exercised Options: $17,824,531
Current Obligation: $17,824,531
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 2031JG21D00023
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-03-11
Current End Date: 2025-03-18
Potential End Date: 2025-03-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-07-25
More Contracts from Stonex Financial Ltd
- Silver RAW Material Mint MAC Silver Bullion — $46.4M (Department of the Treasury)
- Silver RAW Material — $22.5M (Department of the Treasury)
- Silver RAW Material — $21.9M (Department of the Treasury)
- Silver RAW Material Mint MAC Silver Bullion — $21.7M (Department of the Treasury)
- Silver RAW Material — $21.3M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of the Treasury Contracts
- Advertising Services — $636.5M (True North Communications Inc)
- Cade 2 Ltis3 Covid-19 — $383.8M (Deloitte Consulting LLP)
- Establish a Broad Networking and Telecommunications Service Environment to Meet ITS Network Services (wide Area and Local Area Network), Voice Telecommunications Services, Audio/Video/Web Conferencing, and Cyber Requirements — $320.2M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- THE Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Office of Information Technology Office, Issues This Order Under GSA Alliant 2 (unrestricted). Enterprise Case Management (ECM) Solution Integration Services — $305.5M (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Tfcceis Task Order IS to Transition the Existing Tfcc Services From the Networx Contract Onto the EIS Contract Vehicle in a Manner That Will Enable Continuity of an Enterprise Network of Toll Free Services for the IRS — $264.6M (Verizon Business Network Services LLC)