Treasury's IRS awards $9,414 antenna services contract for Atlanta Field Office

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,415 ($9.4K)

Contractor: Macon-Bibb County

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 181 days

Daily Burn Rate: $52/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ANTENNA SERVICES FOR ATLANTA FIELD OFFICE FOR 6 MONTH BASE, 6 MONTH OPTION FOR A PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE OF 10/01/2025 - 09/30/2026

Place of Performance

Location: MACON, BIBB County, GEORGIA, 31202

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $9,414.6 to MACON-BIBB COUNTY for work described as: ANTENNA SERVICES FOR ATLANTA FIELD OFFICE FOR 6 MONTH BASE, 6 MONTH OPTION FOR A PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE OF 10/01/2025 - 09/30/2026 Key points: 1. The contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused need for specific antenna services. 2. The award was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating potential limitations in the procurement process. 3. The period of performance is 181 days, with a base period and a 6-month option, suggesting a short-term or pilot need. 4. The contract is a firm-fixed-price purchase order, which provides cost certainty for the government. 5. The services are for antenna services, a niche requirement within the broader communications equipment sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $9,414.60 for 6 months of antenna services is difficult to benchmark without more specific details on the scope of work. Given the lack of competition and the nature of the service, it's hard to definitively assess value for money. However, the small dollar amount suggests it may not represent a significant financial risk.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was noted as 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' which is ambiguous. It could mean it was procured through a different, potentially less competitive, method or that it falls outside the standard SAP thresholds. Without further information on the specific procurement vehicle used, it's impossible to determine the level of competition or the number of bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of clear competition information raises concerns about whether taxpayers received the best possible price for these services.

Public Impact

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will benefit from enhanced or maintained antenna services at its Atlanta Field Office. This contract supports the operational needs of a federal agency, ensuring communication infrastructure is functional. The services are geographically focused on Atlanta, Georgia. The contract is unlikely to have significant workforce implications due to its specialized and limited scope.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of transparency regarding the procurement method and competition level.
Potential for higher costs due to limited or unknown competition.
Unclear if the services meet the full operational requirements of the IRS.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price award provides cost predictability.
The small contract value limits financial exposure.
Services are essential for the operational continuity of the Atlanta Field Office.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the 'Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing' sector (NAICS 334220). This sector is crucial for modern communication infrastructure, encompassing the production and distribution of broadcasting and wireless communication equipment. The market size for such services can vary widely depending on the specific technology and scale required. This particular award appears to be for a very localized and specific application of antenna services, rather than a large-scale manufacturing or deployment.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was set aside for small businesses, nor is there information about subcontracting plans. Given the small value and specialized nature, it's unlikely to have a significant impact on the broader small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

As a purchase order, oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the IRS's internal procurement and financial management systems. Transparency is limited due to the lack of detailed competition information. There is no specific mention of an Inspector General's involvement for this particular award.

Related Government Programs

IRS Communications Infrastructure
Federal Telecommunications Services
Government Procurement of Specialized Equipment

Risk Flags

Lack of Competition Transparency
Potential for Non-Competitive Award
Unclear Scope of Work

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $9,414.6 to MACON-BIBB COUNTY. ANTENNA SERVICES FOR ATLANTA FIELD OFFICE FOR 6 MONTH BASE, 6 MONTH OPTION FOR A PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE OF 10/01/2025 - 09/30/2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MACON-BIBB COUNTY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9,414.6.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-03-31.

What specific type of antenna services are being procured, and what is the technical requirement driving this need?

The provided data indicates 'ANTENNA SERVICES FOR ATLANTA FIELD OFFICE' but does not specify the exact technical requirements. This could range from installation and maintenance of existing antennas to the setup of new communication arrays. The need could be driven by upgrades to existing communication systems, replacement of aging equipment, or the establishment of new communication capabilities for the Atlanta Field Office. Without a detailed statement of work, it's impossible to ascertain the precise technical specifications or the urgency of the requirement.

How was this contract procured if not under SAP, and what does this imply for price discovery?

The notation 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' is ambiguous. It could mean the contract was awarded using a different procurement procedure that is not subject to the standard Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), or it might have been procured through a specific contract vehicle or existing agreement. If it was a sole-source award or competed among a very limited number of vendors outside of standard competitive processes, it could imply less robust price discovery. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess if the government obtained the best possible price for the services rendered.

What is the typical cost for similar antenna services for a federal field office of this size?

Benchmarking the cost of antenna services for a federal field office is challenging without specific details on the scope of work, type of antenna, installation complexity, and duration. However, for a 6-month base period with a 6-month option, a total value of $9,414.60 is relatively modest. Typical costs can range significantly, from a few thousand dollars for basic maintenance or minor installations to tens of thousands or more for complex system setups or specialized equipment. The small value here suggests a limited scope, possibly routine maintenance or a minor upgrade.

What is the track record of the vendor awarded this contract, if known?

The provided data does not include information about the vendor awarded this contract, making it impossible to assess their track record. To evaluate the contractor's performance history, one would typically look at past performance reviews, contract completion records, and any history of disputes or issues with previous government contracts. Without this vendor information, assessing reliability and past performance is not possible.

What is the historical spending pattern for antenna services by the IRS or the Department of the Treasury?

Historical spending data for antenna services by the IRS or the Department of the Treasury is not provided in the given information. To analyze this, one would need access to historical contract databases (like FPDS or USASpending.gov) to search for similar contracts awarded over previous fiscal years. This analysis would reveal trends in spending, identify key vendors, and potentially highlight periods of increased or decreased investment in such services, providing context for the current award.

Are there any identified risks associated with this specific contract award?

The primary risks identified stem from the lack of transparency in the procurement process. The ambiguity of 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' raises concerns about potential price inflation due to limited competition. Additionally, without knowing the vendor's track record or the specific technical requirements, there's a risk that the services may not fully meet the IRS's operational needs or that the chosen vendor may not have the necessary expertise. The short performance period also introduces a risk of disruption if follow-on services are needed and not adequately planned for.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Communications Equipment Manufacturing › Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: LEASE/RENT FACILITIES › LEASE/RENTAL OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 700 POPLAR STREET, MACON, GA, 31201

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. Local Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,415

Exercised Options: $9,415

Current Obligation: $9,415

Actual Outlays: $6,276

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline