PBGC's $4.45M Investment Contract with Performance Equity Management Faces Scrutiny for Lack of Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,452,077 ($4.5M)
Contractor: Performance Equity Management, LLC
Awarding Agency: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Start Date: 2019-10-01
End Date: 2026-10-31
Contract Duration: 2,587 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: DELPHI PRIVATE MARKETS ASSETS
Place of Performance
Location: GREENWICH, FAIRFIELD County, CONNECTICUT, 06831
Plain-Language Summary
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation obligated $4.5 million to PERFORMANCE EQUITY MANAGEMENT, LLC for work described as: DELPHI PRIVATE MARKETS ASSETS Key points: 1. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) awarded a $4.45 million contract for investment services. 2. The contract was not competed, raising questions about potential price discovery and value for taxpayer money. 3. The lack of competition presents a significant risk of overpayment and reduced overall investment performance. 4. This spending falls within the financial services sector, which often involves complex fee structures.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Without competitive bidding, it is difficult to assess if the pricing is reasonable compared to similar investment management contracts. The firm fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, but the absence of competition limits the ability to benchmark against market rates.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This method bypasses competitive price discovery, potentially leading to higher costs for the government and taxpayers as there is no market pressure to offer the best price.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for this $4.45 million contract means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible value for investment management services, potentially increasing the overall cost to the agency.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for investment management services due to the absence of a competitive bidding process. The PBGC's fiduciary duty to manage pension assets effectively could be compromised if the selected firm is not the most cost-efficient. Lack of transparency in sole-source contract awards can erode public trust in government procurement practices.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Potential for Overpayment
- Limited Benchmarking
- Sole-Source Award
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price Contract
- Defined Contract Duration
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the financial services sector, specifically investment banking and securities dealing. Spending benchmarks in this area are highly variable, but competitive bidding is standard practice to ensure cost-effectiveness for large asset management contracts.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to involve small businesses, as it is a sole-source award to a specific firm. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this agreement.
Oversight & Accountability
The lack of competition for this contract warrants closer oversight from the PBGC's Inspector General to ensure the agency is acting in the best interest of its beneficiaries and taxpayers. Accountability for the sole-source justification is crucial.
Related Government Programs
- Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Contracting
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks transparency.
- Potential for inflated costs.
- Reduced incentive for optimal performance.
- Difficulty in benchmarking against market rates.
- Questionable value for taxpayer funds.
Tags
investment-banking-and-securities-dealin, pension-benefit-guaranty-corporation, ct, definitive-contract, 1m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation awarded $4.5 million to PERFORMANCE EQUITY MANAGEMENT, LLC. DELPHI PRIVATE MARKETS ASSETS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERFORMANCE EQUITY MANAGEMENT, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-10-01. End: 2026-10-31.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and how does it align with the PBGC's procurement regulations?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of available competition. Without specific details from the PBGC, it's impossible to confirm the exact reasoning. However, such justifications are subject to strict review to ensure they are valid and that the government is not foregoing potential cost savings or better performance through competition.
How does the PBGC ensure that the fees paid to Performance Equity Management are competitive and provide good value, given the absence of a competitive bidding process?
The PBGC likely relies on internal benchmarks, industry standards, and potentially independent cost analysis to assess the reasonableness of fees. However, without a competitive process, the assurance of 'good value' is inherently weaker. Regular performance reviews and fee re-negotiations, if permissible under the contract, would be critical to mitigate this risk.
What is the potential financial impact on the PBGC's assets and, by extension, on pension beneficiaries if this contract is not cost-effective?
If the contract is not cost-effective, the PBGC's investment returns could be lower than anticipated, impacting the overall health of the pension insurance program. This could indirectly affect beneficiaries through reduced future benefits or increased premiums. The $4.45 million represents the total contract value, and the actual financial impact depends on the duration and the degree of overpayment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Finance and Insurance › Securities and Commodity Contracts Intermediation and Brokerage › Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: 16PBGC19R0017
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5 GREENWICH OFFICE PARK STE 3, GREENWICH, CT, 06831
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,452,077
Exercised Options: $4,452,077
Current Obligation: $4,452,077
Actual Outlays: $1,950,551
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-10-31
Potential End Date: 2029-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-13
Other Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Contracts
- Field Office Support Services — $141.0M (Serco Inc)
- O&M and DM&E Work — $130.5M (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Portfolio Management Services — $117.6M (Pgim, Inc.)
- Portfolio Management Services — $112.4M (Pacific Investment Management Company LLC)
- This to IS to Improve Customer Service Scores Reported by a 3rd-Party Vendor WHO Completes a Quarterly Participant Caller Survey. PSD Seeks to Improve CX by Reducing the Number of Contacts & Paper Forms Customers Complete to Fulfill Requests — $95.8M (Serco Inc)