DoD Awards $21M ACE-IT Contract Option to Lockheed Martin for Computer Facilities Management

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,980,563 ($21.0M)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-11-01

End Date: 2013-09-30

Contract Duration: 699 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: R0I0830 CTES (OPTION PERIOD 3) ACE-IT

Place of Performance

Location: VICKSBURG, WARREN County, MISSISSIPPI, 39180

State: Mississippi Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: R0I0830 CTES (OPTION PERIOD 3) ACE-IT Key points: 1. Contract value of $20.98M for Option Period 3. 2. Awarded to Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, LLC. 3. Services fall under Computer Facilities Management Services (NAICS 541513). 4. Contract was not competed, raising potential value concerns.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract type is Cost No Fee, which offers limited incentive for cost control. Without a competitive benchmark, assessing the pricing's fairness is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of competition may have hindered price discovery and potentially led to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition suggests taxpayers may not have received the best possible price for these services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to lack of competition. Potential for reduced service quality if contractor faces no competitive pressure. Lack of transparency in the award process.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is highly competitive, making non-competed awards for services like computer facilities management noteworthy. Benchmarks for similar services are typically established through competitive bidding.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. Further investigation is needed to determine if opportunities were missed to engage small businesses in this IT services contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The non-competed nature of this award warrants scrutiny from oversight bodies to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery. Transparency in the justification for sole-source awards is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-facilities-management-services, department-of-defense, ms, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.0 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC. R0I0830 CTES (OPTION PERIOD 3) ACE-IT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-11-01. End: 2013-09-30.

What was the justification for not competing this contract, and how was the price determined to be fair and reasonable?

The justification for not competing this contract is not provided in the data. Typically, agencies must document reasons like urgency, unique capabilities, or lack of sources. Without this documentation, it's impossible to assess the price determination process. A Cost No Fee contract type also complicates price reasonableness assessment as it lacks performance incentives.

What are the risks associated with a sole-source contract for IT facilities management services?

Sole-source contracts for IT facilities management pose risks including inflated pricing due to lack of competition, potential for complacency in service quality, and limited innovation. Taxpayers may not receive the best value. Furthermore, it can create barriers for new or smaller companies to enter the market and provide potentially more cost-effective solutions.

How does the Cost No Fee contract type impact the government's ability to ensure effective service delivery and value for money?

The Cost No Fee (CNF) contract type offers the contractor no incentive to control costs or improve efficiency, as their fee is fixed regardless of performance or cost outcomes. This shifts the entire risk of cost overruns to the government. While it can be useful in specific, high-risk R&D scenarios, for routine services like IT facilities management, it significantly hinders the government's ability to ensure value for money and drive performance improvements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Facilities Management Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)

Address: 2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY, STE 900, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,980,563

Exercised Options: $20,980,563

Current Obligation: $20,980,563

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91WMC07D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-11-01

Current End Date: 2013-09-30

Potential End Date: 2013-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-05-29

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, LLC

View all Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending