DLA RFID Services Contract Awarded to Odyssey RFID LLC for $1.12M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $112,470 ($112.5K)

Contractor: Odyssey Rfid LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-04

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 26 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.3K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: RFID SERVICES FOR DLA PROGRAMS.

Place of Performance

Location: FLORENCE, BOONE County, KENTUCKY, 41042

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $112,470.3 to ODYSSEY RFID LLC for work described as: RFID SERVICES FOR DLA PROGRAMS. Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the firm-fixed-price structure and duration. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competed award, suggesting potential for price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a firm-fixed-price contract and a 26-month duration. 4. Performance context is within IT infrastructure services, supporting DLA operations. 5. Sector positioning is within IT services, specifically data processing and related services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.12 million for 26 months suggests an average annual spend of approximately $432,600. Benchmarking against similar RFID services contracts is challenging without more detailed scope information. However, the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type generally aims to provide predictable costs for the government. The award amount appears reasonable for the duration and the nature of IT infrastructure support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a competitive process suitable for acquisitions below certain thresholds. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP awards typically involve multiple quotes or proposals, allowing for price comparison and selection of the best value. This method aims to balance efficiency with competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A competed award under SAP generally benefits taxpayers by fostering competition, which can lead to more favorable pricing and better quality services compared to sole-source procurements.

Public Impact

Benefits the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) by providing essential RFID services. Services delivered include computing infrastructure, data processing, and related support. Geographic impact is primarily within the DLA's operational footprint. Workforce implications are likely related to IT support and logistics personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific bidder count limits full assessment of competition intensity.
Scope of 'RFID Services' is broad and could encompass various technical requirements.
Firm-fixed-price contracts can shift risk to the government if requirements change significantly.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a competitive process (SAP), indicating potential for good value.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract duration of 26 months allows for stable service provision.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on computing infrastructure and data processing. The market for RFID services is growing, driven by the need for efficient inventory management and tracking across various industries, including government and defense. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar RFID implementations can vary widely based on scale, technology, and integration complexity.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. Analysis of small business participation would require further investigation into the contract's specific clauses and the contractor's subcontracting strategy.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Justice's contracting and financial management offices, given the agency. The Inspector General for the Department of Justice would have jurisdiction for audits and investigations. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are often internal.

Related Government Programs

DLA Logistics IT Support
Defense Supply Chain Management Systems
Federal Prison Industries IT Services
RFID Technology Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep in FFP contracts.
Limited public information on bidder numbers.
Need for detailed past performance review of contractor.
Technology obsolescence risk over contract duration.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $112,470.3 to ODYSSEY RFID LLC. RFID SERVICES FOR DLA PROGRAMS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ODYSSEY RFID LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison Industries / Unicor).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $112,470.3.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-04. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the track record of Odyssey RFID LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

Odyssey RFID LLC's track record in performing federal contracts requires a deeper dive into contract databases like FPDS-NG. Without specific past performance data for this contractor, it's difficult to assess their experience with similar RFID services or their historical performance quality and timeliness. Federal agencies typically evaluate past performance as a key factor in award decisions, so a review of their prior awards and performance reviews would be crucial for a comprehensive understanding of their reliability and capability in delivering on government contracts.

How does the annual cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for RFID services?

The annual cost for this contract is approximately $432,600 ($1.12M / 26 months * 12 months). Benchmarking this against industry standards for RFID services is complex due to the wide variability in scope, technology, and service levels. Factors such as the type of RFID tags, readers, software integration, data management, and ongoing support all influence pricing. Generally, large-scale enterprise RFID deployments with extensive integration can cost significantly more, while smaller, more focused implementations might be less. Without a detailed statement of work, a precise comparison is difficult, but the annual figure appears within a plausible range for a government IT support contract of this nature.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract?

The primary risk associated with this firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract is the potential for scope creep or unforeseen technical challenges that could lead to cost overruns for the contractor, potentially impacting service quality or leading to disputes. If the government's needs evolve beyond the initial scope, change orders would be necessary, which could increase the overall cost. Conversely, if the contractor underestimates the effort required, they might cut corners on quality or support to maintain profitability. The 26-month duration also presents a risk if technology rapidly advances, making the procured solutions outdated before the contract ends.

How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) process in ensuring competitive pricing for IT services?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed for acquisitions below the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000, but can be higher for certain agencies/circumstances). While SAP aims to streamline the procurement process and encourage competition among small businesses and other vendors, its effectiveness in ensuring the *most* competitive pricing compared to full and open competition can vary. SAP typically involves obtaining quotes from a limited number of sources. While this is more competitive than a sole-source award, it may not always yield the same level of price discovery or innovation as a broader, more formal competitive process. For IT services, the complexity and rapid evolution of technology can make it challenging to define requirements adequately for SAP, potentially limiting the range of competitive solutions.

What is the historical spending trend for RFID services by the Department of Justice?

Historical spending data for RFID services specifically by the Department of Justice (DOJ) is not readily available in the provided snippet. To determine this, one would need to query federal procurement databases (like FPDS-NG or USAspending.gov) using relevant Product Service Codes (PSCs) and keywords related to RFID and the DOJ. Analyzing past spending would reveal trends in the volume and value of RFID-related contracts awarded by the DOJ, helping to contextualize the current award and identify any patterns or significant shifts in investment in this technology area.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services

Product/Service Code: TEXTILE/LEATHER/FUR; TENT; FLAG

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7059 PRODUCTION CT, FLORENCE, KY, 41042

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $112,470

Exercised Options: $112,470

Current Obligation: $112,470

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline