DOJ awards $7.97M for professional development training, extending services through September 2026

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,969,696 ($8.0M)

Contractor: SGC23 Joint Venture LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2022-04-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,643 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: EO14042 TD 22005 - TO INITIATE NEW CONTRACT ON EXPIRING CONTRACT DJM-16-A41-G-0475. CURRENT CONTRACT WAS EXTENDED THROUGH 3/31/22. *SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING*

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $8.0 million to SGC23 JOINT VENTURE LLC for work described as: EO14042 TD 22005 - TO INITIATE NEW CONTRACT ON EXPIRING CONTRACT DJM-16-A41-G-0475. CURRENT CONTRACT WAS EXTENDED THROUGH 3/31/22. *SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING* Key points: 1. Contract provides essential professional and management development training to support the U.S. Marshals Service. 2. The award represents a continuation of services, with the current contract extended to ensure uninterrupted support. 3. Competition was conducted under a full and open process, indicating a broad market search. 4. The contract type is labor hours, which allows for flexibility in resource allocation based on evolving needs. 5. The duration of the contract extends over four years, suggesting a long-term requirement for these services. 6. The value of this delivery order is $7.97 million, with funding subject to availability.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $7.97 million over approximately four years appears reasonable for professional development training services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management and professional training within federal agencies suggests this is within a typical range. The labor hours contract type allows for cost control by paying only for the hours worked, which can be efficient if managed properly. However, without specific details on the scope of training and the number of personnel trained, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procedure. This indicates that the agency sought proposals from all responsible sources capable of meeting the requirements, but specific exclusions might have been applied based on certain criteria. The presence of three bidders suggests a moderate level of competition, which is generally positive for price discovery and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with a limited number of bidders, generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios. It encourages contractors to offer competitive rates to secure the award.

Public Impact

Federal employees within the U.S. Marshals Service will benefit from enhanced professional and management skills. Services delivered include professional and management development training, aimed at improving workforce capabilities. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Justice, supporting its operational effectiveness. Workforce implications include the development of skills for federal employees, potentially leading to improved performance and career progression.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if labor hours are not managed efficiently.
Risk of training content becoming outdated if not regularly reviewed and updated.
Dependence on contractor expertise for delivering high-quality, relevant training.

Positive Signals

Continuation of essential services ensures uninterrupted support for the U.S. Marshals Service.
Full and open competition promotes a competitive environment, potentially leading to better service quality and pricing.
The labor hours contract type offers flexibility to adapt to changing training needs.

Sector Analysis

The professional and management development training sector within the federal government is a significant market. Agencies consistently invest in training to enhance employee skills, leadership capabilities, and operational efficiency. This contract fits within the broader professional services category, which includes a wide range of consulting, training, and advisory services. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar training contracts can vary widely based on scope, duration, and the specific skills being developed.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to SGC23 JOINT VENTURE LLC, which is a joint venture. While the data does not explicitly state if this joint venture is specifically structured for small business participation or if there are subcontracting requirements, joint ventures can be a mechanism to facilitate small business involvement in larger contracts. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation and subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Marshals Service and the Department of Justice's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance work statement and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Training Programs
Federal Employee Development
Law Enforcement Training
Management and Professional Training Services

Risk Flags

Funding Availability Clause
Potential for Scope Creep in Labor Hour Contracts
Need for Robust Performance Monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $8.0 million to SGC23 JOINT VENTURE LLC. EO14042 TD 22005 - TO INITIATE NEW CONTRACT ON EXPIRING CONTRACT DJM-16-A41-G-0475. CURRENT CONTRACT WAS EXTENDED THROUGH 3/31/22. *SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING*

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SGC23 JOINT VENTURE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-04-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the specific scope of professional and management development training covered by this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Professional and Management Development Training' (NAICS 611430). However, the specific curriculum, topics covered, target audience levels (e.g., entry-level, mid-management, senior leadership), and delivery methods (e.g., in-person, online, blended) are not detailed in the summary. This information is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the services rendered and for benchmarking against similar training programs. Without this detail, it's difficult to assess the relevance and potential impact of the training.

How does the pricing structure (labor hours) compare to fixed-price training contracts for similar services?

A labor hours contract, like this one, bases costs on the actual hours worked by contractor personnel at pre-negotiated hourly rates. This offers flexibility, allowing the agency to scale services up or down as needed without significant contractual changes. In contrast, fixed-price contracts offer greater cost certainty upfront but less flexibility. For training, labor hours can be advantageous if the exact number of training sessions or participants is uncertain. However, it requires diligent oversight to ensure efficient use of labor and prevent cost creep. Benchmarking would involve comparing the loaded hourly rates for trainers and support staff against market rates and against fixed-price bids for comparable training packages.

What is the track record of SGC23 JOINT VENTURE LLC in delivering federal training contracts?

Information on the specific track record of SGC23 JOINT VENTURE LLC is not detailed in the provided data. As a joint venture, its performance history may be a composite of its member companies or specific to projects undertaken as the JV entity. A thorough assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), other federal contracts awarded to this entity, and client feedback. Understanding their experience with similar government training requirements is key to evaluating their capability and reliability for this contract.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this training contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, training contracts include metrics such as participant satisfaction surveys, pre- and post-training assessments to measure knowledge gain, completion rates, and sometimes follow-up evaluations to assess the application of learned skills on the job. The effectiveness of the training is often evaluated based on how well it meets the objectives outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Without defined KPIs, it is challenging to objectively assess the contractor's performance and the overall value derived from the training.

How does the $7.97 million value compare to historical spending on professional development training by the U.S. Marshals Service?

The $7.97 million allocated over approximately four years (2022-2026) represents an average annual spend of roughly $2 million for professional and management development training. To assess if this is comparable to historical spending, one would need to analyze past contract awards for similar training services by the U.S. Marshals Service or the broader Department of Justice. Factors such as the number of employees trained annually, the types of training provided, and inflation trends would influence historical comparisons. Without this historical context, it's difficult to determine if this contract represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in training.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14291 PARK MEADOW DR STE 150, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,894,185

Exercised Options: $7,969,696

Current Obligation: $7,969,696

Actual Outlays: $3,679,822

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QREB21D0015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline