DOJ's $206.6M Guard Services Contract Awarded to Undisclosed Domestic Firm for FY25
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,660 ($20.7K)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2024-10-01
End Date: 2025-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $57/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: FY2025 DISTRICT GUARD SUPPORT SERVICES - D63
Place of Performance
Location: MUSKOGEE, MUSKOGEE County, OKLAHOMA, 74401
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $20,660 to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: FY2025 DISTRICT GUARD SUPPORT SERVICES - D63 Key points: 1. Contract awarded via GSA Schedule, indicating pre-vetted vendors and potentially streamlined acquisition. 2. The contract's duration of 364 days suggests a need for ongoing, consistent security services. 3. Awarded under Special Access Program (SAP), limiting transparency and public scrutiny. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561612 points to a focus on security guard and patrol services. 5. The contract is a Purchase Order, typically used for smaller value acquisitions or specific service needs. 6. The awardee is listed as 'Undisclosed Domestic Awardees', raising questions about transparency and accountability. 7. The contract is for labor hours, suggesting a flexible service delivery model. 8. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller firms.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to the limited information available, particularly the undisclosed awardee and the Special Access Program (SAP) designation. However, the award value of $206.6 million for a single year of security guard services appears substantial. Without comparable contracts or detailed service requirements, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. The use of GSA Schedule suggests some level of pre-negotiated pricing, but the final price could still vary based on specific service levels and labor rates.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was competed under Special Access Program (SAP) procedures, which inherently limit the scope of competition and transparency. While it was competed, the specific details regarding the number of bidders or the nature of the competition are not publicly disclosed due to the SAP classification. This limited competition environment may impact price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to a full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not benefit from the most competitive pricing due to the restricted nature of the competition. The lack of transparency makes it difficult to ensure that taxpayer funds are being used in the most cost-effective manner.
Public Impact
The U.S. Marshals Service benefits from enhanced security and operational support through these guard services. The services provided are critical for maintaining the security of federal facilities and personnel. The geographic impact is concentrated in Oklahoma, where the services are being delivered. The contract supports a workforce of security guards and patrol personnel, contributing to employment in the security sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of transparency regarding the awardee and specific service details due to SAP designation.
- Limited competition may result in suboptimal pricing for taxpayers.
- Difficulty in benchmarking value for money without comparable data.
- Potential for increased costs due to restricted bidding processes.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through GSA Schedule, suggesting some pre-qualification of vendors.
- Contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing need for essential security services.
- Services are essential for the operational security of the U.S. Marshals Service.
Sector Analysis
The security guard and patrol services sector is a significant component of the broader private security industry. This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services category. The market for government security services is substantial, with numerous contracts awarded annually across various federal agencies. Benchmarking this specific contract's value is difficult without more granular data, but the scale suggests it is a significant award within the security services domain.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by the 'sb': false field. Consequently, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by this specific award. The absence of a small business set-aside means that larger, established security firms were likely the primary participants in the competition, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller enterprises to secure this particular government contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is primarily the responsibility of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Marshals Service. Given the Special Access Program (SAP) designation, transparency mechanisms are likely limited, and public access to oversight reports or performance metrics may be restricted. Accountability would be managed through contractual performance reviews and adherence to SAP protocols. Inspector General jurisdiction may be applicable but would operate under SAP constraints.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- Department of Homeland Security Security Services
- General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules
- Department of Justice Security Operations
Risk Flags
- Lack of Transparency (SAP Designation)
- Undisclosed Awardee
- Limited Competition
Tags
security-services, department-of-justice, us-marshals-service, purchase-order, gsa-schedule, special-access-program, limited-competition, domestic-awardee, oklahoma, labor-hours, fy2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $20,660 to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). FY2025 DISTRICT GUARD SUPPORT SERVICES - D63
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20,660.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.
What specific security services are being procured under this contract?
The contract falls under NAICS code 561612, which pertains to Security Guards and Patrol Services. This typically includes providing on-site security personnel for the protection of property and individuals, access control, surveillance, and response to security incidents. However, due to the Special Access Program (SAP) designation, the precise nature and scope of the services, including the specific locations, types of threats addressed, and required security clearances for personnel, are not publicly disclosed. The contract is for 'LABOR HOURS', indicating that payment is based on the time spent by security personnel performing their duties.
How does the $206.6 million award compare to historical spending on similar guard services by the U.S. Marshals Service?
Direct comparison to historical spending is challenging without access to detailed historical contract data, especially given the SAP classification of this award. However, $206.6 million for a single year of security guard services represents a significant investment. The U.S. Marshals Service, responsible for protecting the federal judiciary and ensuring the security of federal courthouses and personnel, requires substantial security resources. Without specific historical figures for comparable services or contract types, it's difficult to definitively state if this award is higher or lower than previous spending, but its magnitude suggests a substantial and ongoing need for security.
What are the primary risks associated with a contract awarded under Special Access Program (SAP) procedures?
The primary risks associated with SAP contracts include significantly reduced transparency and public accountability. This classification is typically used for highly sensitive national security programs, which can obscure details about the contractor, the services rendered, and the pricing. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for external oversight bodies, including the public and potentially even some internal government watchdogs, to assess value for money, identify potential fraud or waste, or ensure fair competition. The limited competition inherent in SAP processes can also lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
What does the 'Undisclosed Domestic Awardees' designation imply for contractor accountability?
The 'Undisclosed Domestic Awardees' designation, coupled with the SAP classification, significantly complicates contractor accountability. While the contractor is domestic, the inability to publicly identify them means that standard accountability mechanisms, such as public performance reviews or reputational risk, are diminished. Accountability would primarily be managed through direct contractual oversight by the U.S. Marshals Service. However, the lack of public information makes it harder for external stakeholders to verify performance or raise concerns, potentially creating a less robust accountability environment compared to fully transparent contracts.
What is the significance of this contract being a 'Purchase Order' awarded via GSA Schedule?
A Purchase Order (PO) is a common document used to formalize an agreement for goods or services. When awarded via a GSA Schedule, it means the contractor has already been vetted and awarded a contract by GSA, and this PO is essentially an order placed against that existing GSA contract. This method streamlines the acquisition process, often leading to faster delivery of services. For the government, it can offer pre-negotiated pricing and terms, potentially leading to cost savings and reduced administrative burden compared to a full, open-market procurement. However, the specific pricing in the PO is still subject to negotiation or the terms of the GSA Schedule.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: 15M10222QA4700055
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,660
Exercised Options: $20,660
Current Obligation: $20,660
Actual Outlays: $22,585
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-09-30
Potential End Date: 2025-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)