DOJ's $49.9M District Guard Support Services contract awarded to undisclosed domestic entity
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $49,894 ($49.9K)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2024-10-01
End Date: 2025-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $137/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: FY2025 DISTRICT GUARD SUPPORT SERVICES - D24
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20405
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $49,893.75 to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: FY2025 DISTRICT GUARD SUPPORT SERVICES - D24 Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the 364-day duration and labor hours contract type. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competed contract under SAP, suggesting potential for price discovery. 3. Risk indicators are low with a single award and a clear service requirement. 4. Performance context is for security guard and patrol services, a common federal requirement. 5. Sector positioning is within the professional services sector, supporting law enforcement operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $49.9 million for one year of security guard services is within a reasonable range for federal contracts of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for security services, the per-unit cost, while not explicitly detailed, is likely competitive given the competed nature of the award. The use of a purchase order for labor hours suggests flexibility and a focus on service delivery rather than a fixed-price deliverable.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating that it was open to a broad range of potential offerors, though likely limited to small businesses or specific socioeconomic categories depending on the exact SAP thresholds and agency policies. The fact that it was competed suggests that multiple bids were likely solicited and evaluated, leading to a more competitive pricing environment. The specific number of bidders is not disclosed, but the competed nature is a positive sign for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: A competed contract generally leads to better price discovery for taxpayers, as multiple vendors vie for the business, driving down costs. This approach ensures that federal agencies are obtaining services at a fair market price.
Public Impact
The U.S. Marshals Service benefits from enhanced security and operational support. Services delivered include security guard and patrol functions to protect federal facilities and personnel. Geographic impact is focused on Washington D.C., where the services are presumably rendered. Workforce implications include the potential for employment of security personnel by the awarded contractor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific contractor identification hinders assessment of past performance and reliability.
- Details on the specific security requirements and performance metrics are not publicly available.
- The use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures may limit the pool of potential large, experienced contractors.
Positive Signals
- The contract was competed, indicating a level of market engagement and potential for competitive pricing.
- The contract duration is for one year, allowing for periodic reassessment of needs and performance.
- The service is essential for the operational continuity and security of the U.S. Marshals Service.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on security and protective services. The market for security guard services is substantial, with numerous private sector companies offering these solutions to government and commercial clients. Federal spending in this area is consistent, supporting the operational needs of various agencies. This contract represents a portion of the broader federal investment in maintaining secure environments.
Small Business Impact
The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which often favors small businesses. However, without specific details on the set-aside status or the size of the awardee, it's difficult to definitively assess the impact on small businesses. If awarded to a small business, it directly supports that segment of the economy. If subcontracting opportunities are mandated or pursued, it could also benefit other small businesses within the supply chain.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the U.S. Marshals Service, the contracting agency. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and invoice verification are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is limited by the public availability of detailed contract information, particularly regarding the awardee and specific performance metrics. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- Department of Justice Security Services
- Law Enforcement Support Services
- Government Security Guard Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contractor identity not disclosed
- Limited public detail on specific service requirements
Tags
department-of-justice, u-s-marshals-service, security-services, guard-services, patrol-services, competed-under-sap, purchase-order, labor-hours, washington-dc, professional-services, fy2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $49,893.75 to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). FY2025 DISTRICT GUARD SUPPORT SERVICES - D24
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $49,893.75.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.
What is the track record of the awarded contractor for similar security services?
The provided data does not disclose the identity of the awarded contractor, making it impossible to assess their specific track record for similar security services. Without this information, a review of past performance, client satisfaction, and any history of contract disputes or successes cannot be conducted. This lack of transparency regarding the awardee is a significant limitation in evaluating the contractor's reliability and suitability for this role. Future analysis would require identifying the specific entity that received this purchase order.
How does the estimated value compare to market rates for similar security services in Washington D.C.?
The estimated value of $49.9 million for a one-year contract for security guard and patrol services in Washington D.C. needs to be benchmarked against prevailing market rates. While the contract was competed under SAP, which suggests competitive pricing, specific per-hour rates or costs per guard are not detailed. General industry data indicates that security services in major metropolitan areas like D.C. can command higher prices due to labor costs and demand. A detailed analysis would require comparing the contract's labor hour rates against publicly available data for similar services provided by private security firms in the same geographic region.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the security personnel, leading to security breaches or inadequate protection. Another risk is contractor non-compliance with labor laws or contractual obligations. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust performance monitoring by the U.S. Marshals Service, clear performance standards outlined in the contract, and regular reporting requirements. The use of a labor hours contract type allows for flexibility but requires diligent oversight to ensure efficient use of resources and prevent cost overruns. The competed nature of the award also serves as a risk mitigation factor by selecting a vendor presumed to be capable.
What is the historical spending pattern for District Guard Support Services by the U.S. Marshals Service?
Historical spending data for 'District Guard Support Services' by the U.S. Marshals Service is not provided in the current dataset. To establish a pattern, one would need to examine previous contract awards for similar services over multiple fiscal years. This would involve searching federal procurement databases for contracts with the U.S. Marshals Service related to security guards and patrol services, noting their values, durations, and awardees. Analyzing this historical data would reveal trends in spending, identify potential increases or decreases in demand, and provide context for the current $49.9 million award.
What specific security guard and patrol services are included in this contract?
The contract specifies 'Security Guards and Patrol Services' (NAICS code 561612) and is awarded under a 'LABOR HOURS' contract type. This implies that the contractor will provide personnel to perform security functions on an hourly basis. While the exact scope of services is not detailed, it typically includes tasks such as access control, perimeter security, surveillance, responding to incidents, and general presence to deter unauthorized activities. The specific duties, post orders, and operational requirements would be further defined in the contract's statement of work and associated task orders issued by the U.S. Marshals Service.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: 15M10222QA4700055
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $49,894
Exercised Options: $49,894
Current Obligation: $49,894
Actual Outlays: $53,711
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-09-30
Potential End Date: 2025-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-04
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)